Because everytime these players play like ish, that's always the excuse. This team just straight up collasped and got outworked on the frontline. This doesnmt have a DAMN THING TO DO WITH COACHING.
It's a shame that people don't put the responsibility where it belongs.
When your frontline plays soft, and your guards turn the ball over time and time again, that's not coaching folks. It ain't the offense either, because they were running the same ish in the first half that they were running in the 3rd quarter. It's just that the Lakers turned the intensity WAY UP, and we didn't even come close to matching it.
LOL . . . what a 3rd quarter by the World Champs.
Having said all of that, you only have 24 hours to cry about this game. In the NBA, there's no way in hell you can dwell on a performance like this.
0
And don't any of you DARE BLAME WOODY !
Started by northcyde, Nov 01 2009 11:30 PM
90 replies to this topic
#1
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 23-August 05
- Post Count: 5,040
Hall of Fame
- Gender:Male
- Fan since:1984
Posted 01 November 2009 - 11:30 PM
#2
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 14-November 07
- Post Count: 1,805
Starter
- Gender:Male
Posted 01 November 2009 - 11:42 PM
Sigh northcyde. We ALL know you have major love for Woodson...I have never known anyone to love Woody as much as you.
However, this was a terrible game all the way around. I have said my peace in other threads, so I won't say much here. The TEAM let us down tonight.
However, this was a terrible game all the way around. I have said my peace in other threads, so I won't say much here. The TEAM let us down tonight.
#3
-
- Political Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 23-May 08
- Post Count: 2,004
Starter
- Gender:Male
Posted 01 November 2009 - 11:51 PM
The players let us down. I'm sure that sequence of turnovers wasn't a part of Woodson's gameplan. Up until then, we were very much in the game.
#4
-
- Squawk Supporter
-
- Join Date: 18-April 05
- Post Count: 4,346
Resident Capologist
- Gender:Male
- Location: Trillville
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:02 AM
The players certainly played like crap, but why didn't we foul at the end of the game? I'm not saying we would have won, but its a situation that could help you prepare for future games. Your players get into the habit of playing a certain way at the end of the game, might as well start it off right by putting the Lakers on the line and stopping the clock.
#5
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 06-March 08
- Post Count: 1,429
Starter
buffsealy
#6
-
- Political Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 26-September 03
- Post Count: 11,296
Head Coach
- Gender:Male
- Location: GA
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:05 AM
northcyde, on 01 November 2009 - 11:30 PM, said:
Because everytime these players play like ish, that's always the excuse. This team just straight up collasped and got outworked on the frontline. This doesnmt have a DAMN THING TO DO WITH COACHING.
It's a shame that people don't put the responsibility where it belongs.
When your frontline plays soft, and your guards turn the ball over time and time again, that's not coaching folks. It ain't the offense either, because they were running the same ish in the first half that they were running in the 3rd quarter. It's just that the Lakers turned the intensity WAY UP, and we didn't even come close to matching it.
LOL . . . what a 3rd quarter by the World Champs.
Having said all of that, you only have 24 hours to cry about this game. In the NBA, there's no way in hell you can dwell on a performance like this.
It's a shame that people don't put the responsibility where it belongs.
When your frontline plays soft, and your guards turn the ball over time and time again, that's not coaching folks. It ain't the offense either, because they were running the same ish in the first half that they were running in the 3rd quarter. It's just that the Lakers turned the intensity WAY UP, and we didn't even come close to matching it.
LOL . . . what a 3rd quarter by the World Champs.
Having said all of that, you only have 24 hours to cry about this game. In the NBA, there's no way in hell you can dwell on a performance like this.
Who gives a damn if they beat Portland or not? It's meaingless in the grand scheme of things.
#7
-
- Political Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 03-July 02
- Post Count: 1,740
Role Player
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:16 AM
EazyRoc, on 01 November 2009 - 11:51 PM, said:
The players let us down. I'm sure that sequence of turnovers wasn't a part of Woodson's gameplan. Up until then, we were very much in the game.
On the don't blame Woody question.
3 games into the season we are giving up 105 ppg with a "defensive" minded coach.
Either it's the scheme's fault or he's lost the players willingness to execute the scheme. Either way, that's not a good sign.
The biggest issue tonight though is this......in the first two games we forced the ball inside and let the big men dominate the game. tonight comparing the top 4 big men (horf, josh, joe smith, williams) to the top 4 guards (bibby, johnson, teague, crawford) the stats show we reverted to being a guard dominated team.
Guards - 24-47 shooting, 9 assists, 15 rebounds
bigmen - 10-30 shooting, 11 assists, 21 rebounds
When the guards are taking almost 60% more shots and dishing out less assists than your bigs, that is a problem. The bigs were obviously somewhat active with 21 rebounds (though that shows how few opportunities they had for boards..the lakers made everything and defensively their guards made it to the lane all night.). But when your top assists man is Josh Smith AGAIN, you have a problem.
What i saw all night was the guards dominating the ball and not trying to get it into the hands of the bigs with them in position. Lots of one on one and not looking up to start the offense down low like we did in the first game. The shots offered don't lie.
in the wizards game it was 40 - 34....closer and in indiana, 38-40. I saw all last year a definite difference in how the team played, with how much the guards dominated the ball. First 2 games it was 78-74 in favor of the guards. this game...47-30...that is a monstrous difference. you can not win without balance.
Edited by thecampster, 02 November 2009 - 12:17 AM.
#8
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 17-February 08
- Post Count: 878
6th Man
- Gender:Male
- Location: Atlanta GA
-
Interests:
Women,,X-Box 360, - Fan since:1996
#9
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 23-August 05
- Post Count: 5,040
Hall of Fame
- Gender:Male
- Fan since:1984
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:21 AM
EazyRoc, on 01 November 2009 - 11:51 PM, said:
The players let us down. I'm sure that sequence of turnovers wasn't a part of Woodson's gameplan. Up until then, we were very much in the game.
Exactly. Now THAT'S "the truth".
Woody called 2 timeouts in that damn quarter, and it still didn't help. Once the Lakers started to really push our guys around, they just folded. Coaching can't prevent guys who don't like to be pushed around, from folding up like a tent. I'm mainly talking about Marvin and Smoove tonight.
But I guess all of that is Woody's fault I guess. I'm sure he's taking the brunt of the blame on RealGM, ESPN, and on the AJC blog comments. Him and probably JJ, for not scoring 40 to help us win.
LOL . . this team scores 110 points on the road and still loses. They should've saved some of those points for Portland.
Oh well . . no time to cry during the NBA season. We got 4 more games just this week.
#10
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 16-June 06
- Post Count: 1,228
Starter
- Location: Douglasville, GA
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:26 AM
If performances like this happen over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again the coach has to be somewhat accountable. Woodson is an incompetent head coach and/or he doesn't have the respect of his players. That's a problem. It has been a problem for a long time now. This was just a terrible game all around so I'm not going to waste anymore time posting about.
#11
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 23-August 05
- Post Count: 5,040
Hall of Fame
- Gender:Male
- Fan since:1984
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:31 AM
hawksfanatic, on 02 November 2009 - 12:02 AM, said:
The players certainly played like crap, but why didn't we foul at the end of the game? I'm not saying we would have won, but its a situation that could help you prepare for future games. Your players get into the habit of playing a certain way at the end of the game, might as well start it off right by putting the Lakers on the line and stopping the clock.
Foul at the end of the game? Why? So we could lose by MORE POINTS?
This isn't college basketball, in which you have the 1 and 1. If you miss that first free throw, you can rebound the ball and go the other way. In college, when you reach the free throw foul penalty ( 7 fouls ), a team gets to shoot the 1 and 1 until the opposing team reaches the 10th foul. After that, they get 2 shots no matter what.
The NBA is vastly different. Once a team reaches 5 fouls, the opposing gets to shoot 2 free throws . . no matter what. And in the NBA, most of the guards who will handle the ball in late game situations, are at least 80%+ free throw shooters.
That's why you hardly ever see an NBA team excessively foul at the end of games. It's pretty much useless. It's almost an unwritten rule that if you're down more than 8 points with a minute to go, that the opposing team isn't going to foul you to extend the game.
#12
-
- Political Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 23-May 08
- Post Count: 2,004
Starter
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:33 AM
thecampster, on 02 November 2009 - 12:16 AM, said:
On the don't blame Woody question.
3 games into the season we are giving up 105 ppg with a "defensive" minded coach.
Either it's the scheme's fault or he's lost the players willingness to execute the scheme. Either way, that's not a good sign.
The biggest issue tonight though is this......in the first two games we forced the ball inside and let the big men dominate the game. tonight comparing the top 4 big men (horf, josh, joe smith, williams) to the top 4 guards (bibby, johnson, teague, crawford) the stats show we reverted to being a guard dominated team.
Guards - 24-47 shooting, 9 assists, 15 rebounds
bigmen - 10-30 shooting, 11 assists, 21 rebounds
When the guards are taking almost 60% more shots and dishing out less assists than your bigs, that is a problem. The bigs were obviously somewhat active with 21 rebounds (though that shows how few opportunities they had for boards..the lakers made everything and defensively their guards made it to the lane all night.). But when your top assists man is Josh Smith AGAIN, you have a problem.
What i saw all night was the guards dominating the ball and not trying to get it into the hands of the bigs with them in position. Lots of one on one and not looking up to start the offense down low like we did in the first game. The shots offered don't lie.
in the wizards game it was 40 - 34....closer and in indiana, 38-40. I saw all last year a definite difference in how the team played, with how much the guards dominated the ball. First 2 games it was 78-74 in favor of the guards. this game...47-30...that is a monstrous difference. you can not win without balance.
3 games into the season we are giving up 105 ppg with a "defensive" minded coach.
Either it's the scheme's fault or he's lost the players willingness to execute the scheme. Either way, that's not a good sign.
The biggest issue tonight though is this......in the first two games we forced the ball inside and let the big men dominate the game. tonight comparing the top 4 big men (horf, josh, joe smith, williams) to the top 4 guards (bibby, johnson, teague, crawford) the stats show we reverted to being a guard dominated team.
Guards - 24-47 shooting, 9 assists, 15 rebounds
bigmen - 10-30 shooting, 11 assists, 21 rebounds
When the guards are taking almost 60% more shots and dishing out less assists than your bigs, that is a problem. The bigs were obviously somewhat active with 21 rebounds (though that shows how few opportunities they had for boards..the lakers made everything and defensively their guards made it to the lane all night.). But when your top assists man is Josh Smith AGAIN, you have a problem.
What i saw all night was the guards dominating the ball and not trying to get it into the hands of the bigs with them in position. Lots of one on one and not looking up to start the offense down low like we did in the first game. The shots offered don't lie.
in the wizards game it was 40 - 34....closer and in indiana, 38-40. I saw all last year a definite difference in how the team played, with how much the guards dominated the ball. First 2 games it was 78-74 in favor of the guards. this game...47-30...that is a monstrous difference. you can not win without balance.
Edited by EazyRoc, 02 November 2009 - 12:33 AM.
#13
-
- Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 15-February 09
- Post Count: 451
Role Player
- Gender:Male
- Location: Nashville, TN
-
Interests:
Atlanta sports and music. Women, beer, food, drinking - Fan since:2002
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:35 AM
You can tell this team has come a long way when we are arguing about an 8 point Road loss against the World Champs and the greatest player in the NBA post-Jordan era.
Unfortunately I didnt get to watch the game so I cant comment on effort and heart and things like that, but after the way the Lakers lost their previous game at home, I figured we'd be a long shot to win this no matter what, they are the better team on any day but they were esp motivated coming in to this game, had they not lost the other day, I coulda saw us pull this one out but they simply were not gonna let themselves lose back to back games at home, Im just glad they didnt get blown out, and it actually looks like a close game (on paper).
Unfortunately I didnt get to watch the game so I cant comment on effort and heart and things like that, but after the way the Lakers lost their previous game at home, I figured we'd be a long shot to win this no matter what, they are the better team on any day but they were esp motivated coming in to this game, had they not lost the other day, I coulda saw us pull this one out but they simply were not gonna let themselves lose back to back games at home, Im just glad they didnt get blown out, and it actually looks like a close game (on paper).
#14
-
- Political Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 23-May 08
- Post Count: 2,004
Starter
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:37 AM
We could have won this game if it wasn't for the turnovers. The Hawks were uncharacteristically careless with the basketball and paid the price for it.
#15
-
- Political Squawkers
-
- Join Date: 26-September 03
- Post Count: 11,296
Head Coach
- Gender:Male
- Location: GA
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:39 AM
RedDawg#8, on 02 November 2009 - 12:35 AM, said:
You can tell this team has come a long way when we are arguing about an 8 point Road loss against the World Champs and the greatest player in the NBA post-Jordan era.
Unfortunately I didnt get to watch the game so I cant comment on effort and heart and things like that, but after the way the Lakers lost their previous game at home, I figured we'd be a long shot to win this no matter what, they are the better team on any day but they were esp motivated coming in to this game, had they not lost the other day, I coulda saw us pull this one out but they simply were not gonna let themselves lose back to back games at home, Im just glad they didnt get blown out, and it actually looks like a close game (on paper).
Unfortunately I didnt get to watch the game so I cant comment on effort and heart and things like that, but after the way the Lakers lost their previous game at home, I figured we'd be a long shot to win this no matter what, they are the better team on any day but they were esp motivated coming in to this game, had they not lost the other day, I coulda saw us pull this one out but they simply were not gonna let themselves lose back to back games at home, Im just glad they didnt get blown out, and it actually looks like a close game (on paper).
It was a 20 point game in the 3rd period. This game WAS a blow out.
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
