I'm boycotting the Hawks
#1
Posted 19 July 2010 - 12:35 PM
#2
Posted 19 July 2010 - 12:36 PM
Skar, on 19 July 2010 - 12:35 PM, said:
I already boycott the Thrashers because of their mishandling of the franchise. I understand why you are upset with the ASG. I'll give them this season to see if they use Crawford's and Evans expiring to improve the team before I consider not going to Hawks games.
#3
Posted 19 July 2010 - 12:44 PM
Sothron, on 19 July 2010 - 12:36 PM, said:
The Thrashers this year gives me hope with the improvements they made, however the Hawks have yet to improve, instead they overpay for Joe (which gives up in playoffs and trashes the fans) 90% chance (imo) we lose Horford after his contract is up. Still don't have a center to compete with the likes of Dwight Howard. I guess the beat down by Orlando didn't send a message to the ASG.
#5
Posted 19 July 2010 - 01:15 PM
Quote
Seriously... you think that the Hawks paying Joe means that they wouldn't match a contract on Horford? He will be a RFA- he can only leave if the Hawks decide to let him leave. If you think resigning Joe kills the chances that Crawford is back after next season I can see that but I'd be surprised to see Horford leave.
#6
Posted 19 July 2010 - 01:25 PM
#7
Posted 19 July 2010 - 02:41 PM
#8
Posted 19 July 2010 - 09:29 PM
Skar, on 19 July 2010 - 12:35 PM, said:
Hey youngan, we have all been there. Several of us have been around over 20 years (32 for me) and I know your feelings and aggravation. I'm pretty bugged right now myself and if the Hawks don't get Shaq I won't attend any games this year and will watch less on tv. You can never totally leave and not be a fan anymore, you'll be back for more like the rest of us.
#9
Posted 19 July 2010 - 11:40 PM
#10
Posted 19 July 2010 - 11:52 PM
Skar, on 19 July 2010 - 12:35 PM, said:
#11
Posted 20 July 2010 - 03:53 AM
Skar, on 19 July 2010 - 12:35 PM, said:
Nire gets an and 1. What else do you want Skar? They won 53 games last year. They brought JJ back (I disagree with the move, but you can't say they were cheap about it). They are 4 million from the Luxury tax and trying to get the best players they can for what little they have to spend. Be educated in your response, but what would you have had them do? Who would you have acquired realistically via free agency for less than 4 million a season that would have put them over the top?
#12
Posted 20 July 2010 - 05:56 AM
Skar, on 19 July 2010 - 12:35 PM, said:
#13
Posted 20 July 2010 - 06:16 AM
Things did change. Maybe not the players. I sincerely believe the owners are doing whatever
they can to change - improve the Hawks. No one can force any free agent to come here. And,
if there is to be a trade, both teams must agree to the trade.
The big change is in changing the head coach. Many of us griped about Woody, some more
than others. Well, he's gone. Are we better with our new coach? Gotta wait and see. But, we
all hope so.
We gave Chills away, more or less. Apparently our GM is trying to give Marvin away. Fans have
griped about both these players. Will moving them change any thing? Here again, it's a "Wait and
see" question.
An old country song appllies here. "Don't count your money while the cards are on the table. There's
time for counting when the dealing"s done."
Wait until the season starts. Watch the final roster players as they play and the new coach. Then
decide. It's much too early to jump on or off the band wagon.
GO DREAM!
Edited by Gray Mule, 20 July 2010 - 06:18 AM.
#14
Posted 20 July 2010 - 08:34 AM
#15
Posted 20 July 2010 - 08:36 AM
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















