cyman3

they want the next chris paul and are willing to draft/trade for a PG every year til they get another chris paul. lol.

wish we had michael williams on our team...

his defense (or lack thereof) on 1 play lead to a W for the celtics. Ray allen didnt have to do anything. just drive to the right and get an easy uncontested layup.

u can probably find it cheaper on HALF.COM

Quote: She looks kind of like Acie, to be honest... i know what u mean. i think its the nose. im glad horford has his priorities straight. good for him!

i like them... but its so hard to find quality "martial arts" movies. crouching tiger, hidden dragon is probably one of favorites (if not the favorite). the new one, the forbidden kingdom, is probably one of the worst (if not the worst!)

at halftime, i took a shower ... and ate some food. come back to watch the game in the 4th quarter and the lead was cut down to 4 points! i thought it was a mistake at first. well i expect Kobe to come out looking to score 40+ in game 5 with the lakers winning. then Game 6 in boston, i think celtics will take it. i would love for it to go 7 games though... that would be cool!

the MEMPHIS GRIZZLES? when have they ever been to the conference finals?

yeah, its all about the TIP OFF at the beginning of the game.

Lets assume we win game 6 and have to go back to Boston for game 7. The 3 games we lost in boston, we lost by 20+ points. That being said, we cant do the same thing. We need a new gameplan for game 7. I say we take Bibby out (if his shooting is off, hes useless out there) and either insert Johnson at PG (and let him guard Rondo so he wont be in foul trouble) or Acie Law (who plays better defense and penetrates on offense) at PG. I dont want to rely on Bibby's inconsistency for a game 7 victory. Bibby is good 1 out of 4 games. inconsistent players need to come off the bench!

assuming there is a game 7, i say we dont play Bibby or let him come off the bench. heres why: 1) If hes not hitting shots, hes absolutely useless on the court. sometimes, his offense is so great that it offsets his defense (or lack thereof). Hes inconsistent and shows up 1 out of 4 games. That being said, i rather not take the chance that he "shows" up. Hes a liability on defense and needs help guarding his man, which leads to an open 3 for Boston. I say we either: A) ACIE LAW. At least we know Acie will play well defensively on RONDO. or B) JOE JOHNSON at PG. and start Zaza at center. We get bigger and hopefully this leads to more REBOUNDS.

http://sh00ter.hostsnake.com/ works as well. its like 1-2 minutes behind "real time" and quality isint too great... but its watchable. for those who dont want to download sopcast.

http://www.myp2pforum.eu/nba-basketball/20...on-streams.html they usually post up links for live nba games.

Quote: My favorite post in that thread: "Why can't the Celtics get players like Joe Johnson?" thats hilarious! lol.

lol. 50/50. haha. dolfan, want me to vote again?

we need to take advantage of this! lol. do things a little differently, just so that Ray is preoccupied w/ other thoughts during the game.

if Garnett is going to be guarding Josh Smith, we take Josh Smith out of the game offensively. before you guys start w/ the "wtf cyman3?" hear me out. Garnett is one of the best rebounders in the game. We need Josh Smith in the game at the defensive end where he is a good help defender and rebounder. On offense, have Josh Smith lurking far away as if hes going to be shootin long jumpers all night. Instead of takin the long jumpers, just stay out there (for the most part) so that Garnett wouldnt be lurking in the paint ready to grab rebounds. whoever ray allen is guarding... that player (whether its Childress/Marvin/Joe) needs to go off for 40 points!

this works better for me (quality) http://www.justin.tv/rntv95 thought id share.

Quote: I need help too. Thanks. try this http://www.justin.tv/jtv_sports2 worked for me.

got it! using justin.tv thanks!

link not working?

i need a link as well! anyone willin to give me a hand?

that was close! 0.6 secs and the game would be over!

in a half-court game, size is bigger factor. SHAQ would not have any stamina problems and would be a HUGE FORCE. in a full court game, shaq may be a liability at times... but in a halfcourt game, if im a captain- i pick him FIRST! on a 3-on-3 game, each individual is stressed and has more impact compared to a 5-on-5 game. Assists are HARDER to come and PGs maybe a disadvantage. So NASH/PAUL are better 5-on-5 players than 3-on-3 players. its a fun thought, but i like lakers (2 bigs and kobe!), Suns (shaq, stoudemire, nash), Spurs in the west. and Boston and Detroit in the east.

Joe Johnson was THE BEST PLAYER on the court. then you have bibby hitting some clutch shots. and on top of all that? theres a rookie grabbing offensive rebounds in the final 2 minutes of the game to give atlanta extra possessions! Horford is one heckuva player.