benhillboy Posted January 19, 2020 Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 (edited) I hate to be a Debbie but it should be illustrated how easily traditional PGs (run the team’s offense at the expense of their personal numbers, defend ALL THE TIME) absolutely dominate Trae. He has played 19 games versus: Fred Van Fleet (undrafted) Kyle Lowry (24th pick) Kendrick Nunn (undrafted) Malcolm Brogdon (36th pick) George Hill (26th pick) DJ Augustine (9th pick) Marcus Smart (6th pick) Patrick Beverly (42nd pick) SGA (11th pick) and CP3 (moonwalk into the Hall) His combined +/- in those contests is -162. Their combined +/-? +173. I’m sorry. Trae is not a player to build around. Not when players with huge chips on their shoulders and high team IQs salivate at the sight of him. It’s only gonna get worse after he makes the AS Team. His nonexistent off ball play, assist-hunting, and 0 defensive value is fatal to any team he plays on to the point where his high usage and ball dominance only neuters his teammates and exacerbates their flaws. His phenomenal raw production should translate to wins, no if, ands, and buts about it. I get tired of hearing about his fellow starters’ weaknesses (Bruno instead of Len) when they all have viable strengths. I’m off my soapbox, seems like I’m back to the days of trashing Joe all the time. Please discuss, call me an idiot, it’s all welcome. Edited January 19, 2020 by benhillboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benhillboy Posted January 19, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 I meant to add this is since Jan 2, 2019 when he hit his stride, I threw out the first 2.5 months of his career as it was abominable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post REHawksFan Posted January 19, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 Seems kinda like you are cherry picking players to look at. Not sure the benefit of that but I dont feel like getting into an argument of it. So I'll just say, "ok" and leave it at that. IMO Trae is a budding superstar and moreso than that, the organization believes he is the player to build around. So it's not really a point worth debating imo. 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Popular Post cam1218 Posted January 19, 2020 Premium Member Popular Post Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 I always love your thoughts @benhillboy, and I agree with some of them here. His defense is a concern. I’ve noticed his effort defensively is getting better though. He also has a small body, so you hope with age he will grow some and also learn better technique. I also know that he has to do so much for us offensively that he gets worn down throughout some games, so it is hard to do it all. Not just defensively, but you can see it offensively too. I hope having Teague back will help with this. His offensive game, to me at least, is so good. The way he can pass, space the floor, hit clutch shots, etc. He is young and our team is young too. Everyone is growing and will get better. I’d like to revisit this idea in a couple of years. So for now, I definitely think he is a player to build around. You have to do it wisely though knowing his defensive concerns. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NBASupes Posted January 19, 2020 Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 I agree to a degree. I just think he is freaking amazing at scoring and passing. But his decision making and PG skills must improve 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post HawkItus Posted January 19, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 1 hour ago, benhillboy said: I hate to be a Debbie but it should be illustrated how easily traditional PGs (run the team’s offense at the expense of their personal numbers, defend ALL THE TIME) absolutely dominate Trae. He has played 19 games versus: Fred Van Fleet (undrafted) Kyle Lowry (24th pick) Kendrick Nunn (undrafted) Malcolm Brogdon (36th pick) George Hill (26th pick) DJ Augustine (9th pick) Marcus Smart (6th pick) Patrick Beverly (42nd pick) SGA (11th pick) and CP3 (moonwalk into the Hall) His combined +/- in those contests is -162. Their combined +/-? +173. I’m sorry. Trae is not a player to build around. Not when players with huge chips on their shoulders and high team IQs salivate at the sight of him. It’s only gonna get worse after he makes the AS Team. His nonexistent off ball play, assist-hunting, and 0 defensive value is fatal to any team he plays on to the point where his high usage and ball dominance only neuters his teammates and exacerbates their flaws. His phenomenal raw production should translate to wins, no if, ands, and buts about it. I get tired of hearing about his fellow starters’ weaknesses (Bruno instead of Len) when they all have viable strengths. I’m off my soapbox, seems like I’m back to the days of trashing Joe all the time. Please discuss, call me an idiot, it’s all welcome. I'd like to see the +/- of all our starters against those teams before calling you an idiot. 7 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post EazyRoc Posted January 19, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 1 hour ago, benhillboy said: I hate to be a Debbie but it should be illustrated how easily traditional PGs (run the team’s offense at the expense of their personal numbers, defend ALL THE TIME) absolutely dominate Trae. He has played 19 games versus: Fred Van Fleet (undrafted) Kyle Lowry (24th pick) Kendrick Nunn (undrafted) Malcolm Brogdon (36th pick) George Hill (26th pick) DJ Augustine (9th pick) Marcus Smart (6th pick) Patrick Beverly (42nd pick) SGA (11th pick) and CP3 (moonwalk into the Hall) His combined +/- in those contests is -162. Their combined +/-? +173. I’m sorry. Trae is not a player to build around. Not when players with huge chips on their shoulders and high team IQs salivate at the sight of him. It’s only gonna get worse after he makes the AS Team. His nonexistent off ball play, assist-hunting, and 0 defensive value is fatal to any team he plays on to the point where his high usage and ball dominance only neuters his teammates and exacerbates their flaws. His phenomenal raw production should translate to wins, no if, ands, and buts about it. I get tired of hearing about his fellow starters’ weaknesses (Bruno instead of Len) when they all have viable strengths. I’m off my soapbox, seems like I’m back to the days of trashing Joe all the time. Please discuss, call me an idiot, it’s all welcome. We need to take that soapbox and lock that bitch in a vault. Trae is absolutely a player you can build around. Wins are a team stat, so it’s fallacious to imply that he alone is responsible for our record whether it is good or bad. He has his flaws, but we just passed the halfway point of his second season. He will get better across the board and this team will get better too. 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post EazyRoc Posted January 19, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 I mean how many times do we have to re-hash this. The way this team is built currently is stunting the development of all of our young players which is why Schlenk is transitioning away from a full on tank. This is some RealGM ish right here. 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Popular Post JayBirdHawk Posted January 19, 2020 Premium Member Popular Post Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 All those PGs have size and length over Trae, he'll always be at a disadvantage defensively. Most of those PGs (except CP3) aren't first option offense for their teams - they are roll players. Teams aren't game planning to stop any of them. Trae is still learning the PG position as the team itself grows and develoops When you factor in their years of experience, the team surrounding them, playoff quality teams, more conplete teams vs the Hawks rebuilding - in the word of @NBASupes - One Star Thread. Sorry @benhillboy - burn that soapbox. 4 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post High5 Posted January 19, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 19, 2020 (edited) Seems like a fairly arbitrary and unscientific study. Trae wasn't matched with those players all of the time. In some cases 2 of those guys were on the floor at the same time. And they were all on playoff teams while we've been tanking/rebuilding. +/- from game-to-game doesn't say much about individual players. You can thoroughly outplay your opposite number and end up with a -20 if the rest of your team gets whooped. I get what you're saying and have similar concerns, but those numbers don't mean much to me at this point. Edited January 19, 2020 by High5 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spud2nique Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 Does this mean your not gonna vote 🗳 him into the all star game Benny? Trae Young, who averages 28.8, had only 16 points against the Pistons. The second-year guard is on pace to become only the third Hawk to average 28 points on the season, joining Bob Pettit (three times) and Dominique Wilkins (four times). 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post REHawksFan Posted January 20, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 hours ago, Spud2nique said: Does this mean your not gonna vote 🗳 him into the all star game Benny? Trae Young, who averages 28.8, had only 16 points against the Pistons. The second-year guard is on pace to become only the third Hawk to average 28 points on the season, joining Bob Pettit (three times) and Dominique Wilkins (four times). You don't even have to limit it to Hawks players Spud. Among players 21 years and younger, no player in the history of the NBA has averaged 28+ pts / gm and 8+ ast / game. Trae and Luka are both doing that this season. If you remove the age requirement, only 6 other players have EVER accomplished that feat: Oscar Robertson (8 times) James Harden (2) Russell Westbrook (2) Tiny Archibald (2) Michael Jordan (1) LeBron James (1) But sure.....Trae isn't a player that you should build around. 5 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TheNorthCydeRises Posted January 20, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 43 minutes ago, REHawksFan said: You don't even have to limit it to Hawks players Spud. Among players 21 years and younger, no player in the history of the NBA has averaged 28+ pts / gm and 8+ ast / game. Trae and Luka are both doing that this season. If you remove the age requirement, only 6 other players have EVER accomplished that feat: Oscar Robertson (8 times) James Harden (2) Russell Westbrook (2) Tiny Archibald (2) Michael Jordan (1) LeBron James (1) But sure.....Trae isn't a player that you should build around. Yeah, I've been pointing this out since early December. Trae is playing at a historic level offensively right now. If you refine the numbers even further: 28 ppg 8 asst 4 rebs 37% 3FG% Trae is the only guy in the HISTORY of the league who has done that. The other notable thing on that list you posted, is that all of those guys except Archibald are 6-5 and taller. Tiny put up those numbers twice in the ABA, but never in the NBA ( after he tore his Achilles ). 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thomas Posted January 20, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 The excellent offensive stats he has can't factor in things like his assists would be even higher than they are and his turnovers lower if we had more efficient scoring inside (Len and others), lets include JC was gone for 25 games in there too (our best target for Trae). Stats can definitely have a ceiling when it comes to impact. 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post REHawksFan Posted January 20, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 14 hours ago, benhillboy said: I hate to be a Debbie but it should be illustrated how easily traditional PGs (run the team’s offense at the expense of their personal numbers, defend ALL THE TIME) absolutely dominate Trae. He has played 19 games versus: Fred Van Fleet (undrafted) Kyle Lowry (24th pick) Kendrick Nunn (undrafted) Malcolm Brogdon (36th pick) George Hill (26th pick) DJ Augustine (9th pick) Marcus Smart (6th pick) Patrick Beverly (42nd pick) SGA (11th pick) and CP3 (moonwalk into the Hall) His combined +/- in those contests is -162. Their combined +/-? +173. I’m sorry. Trae is not a player to build around. Not when players with huge chips on their shoulders and high team IQs salivate at the sight of him. It’s only gonna get worse after he makes the AS Team. His nonexistent off ball play, assist-hunting, and 0 defensive value is fatal to any team he plays on to the point where his high usage and ball dominance only neuters his teammates and exacerbates their flaws. His phenomenal raw production should translate to wins, no if, ands, and buts about it. I get tired of hearing about his fellow starters’ weaknesses (Bruno instead of Len) when they all have viable strengths. I’m off my soapbox, seems like I’m back to the days of trashing Joe all the time. Please discuss, call me an idiot, it’s all welcome. OK so I got curious about your numbers and wanted to see for myself. And unless I'm missing something, it seems like you are off a bit. Here's what I found: Trae vs: Lowry - 2 times VanVleet - 3 times Nunn - 2 times Brogdon - 4 times Hill - 5 times Augustine - 5 times Smart - 3 times Beverly - 1 time SGA - 1 time CP3 - 2 times That totals 28 instances where the above 10 players played in the same game as Trae. However, there are also 5 instances where two players played in the same game with Trae so there were 23 actual games featuring Trae and any combination of the above players. In those 23 games, Trae has a p/m of -242. However, the overall team also had a p/m of -264. More to the point, in 13 of the 23 games, the team's p/m was worse without Trae than with Trae. And all of the above fails to consider the fact that other players have a SIGNIFICANT impact on p/m and there's no guarantee that these other PGs were even the players guarding Trae all the time or whether Trae was guarding them. Bottom line, this particular line of thinking seems pretty disingenuous and doesn't really paint an accurate picture of Trae or his ability to be the Alpha on a championship squad. Consider this: The Hawks have played 43 games this season (Trae has played 39). The Hawks overall get outscored 7.27 pts / 36 min. WITH Trae on the floor, the Hawks get outscored by 5.17 pts / 36. WITHOUT Trae, they get outscored by 11.29 pts / 36. Further, in only 10 of the 43 games have the Hawks had a net positive p/m with Trae off the court compared to on. In the other 33 games, the team is far better with Trae than without. 5 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 hours ago, REHawksFan said: You don't even have to limit it to Hawks players Spud. Among players 21 years and younger, no player in the history of the NBA has averaged 28+ pts / gm and 8+ ast / game. Trae and Luka are both doing that this season. If you remove the age requirement, only 6 other players have EVER accomplished that feat: Oscar Robertson (8 times) James Harden (2) Russell Westbrook (2) Tiny Archibald (2) Michael Jordan (1) LeBron James (1) But sure.....Trae isn't a player that you should build around. A bit off topic here but remember not long ago Oscar showing irritation about a pass to a three point shooter that scores is an assist. Guessing his assists numbers would be way crazier if he had that possibility back in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Popular Post macdaddy Posted January 20, 2020 Moderators Popular Post Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 Pulled this off Brad Rowland: Quote Since Collins came back, the Hawks are -3.0 in 334 minutes when Young plays. -15.9 in 290 minutes when he sits I pretty sure that Trae is not the problem. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TheNorthCydeRises Posted January 20, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 (edited) 16 hours ago, benhillboy said: I hate to be a Debbie but it should be illustrated how easily traditional PGs (run the team’s offense at the expense of their personal numbers, defend ALL THE TIME) absolutely dominate Trae. He has played 19 games versus: Fred Van Fleet (undrafted) Kyle Lowry (24th pick) Kendrick Nunn (undrafted) Malcolm Brogdon (36th pick) George Hill (26th pick) DJ Augustine (9th pick) Marcus Smart (6th pick) Patrick Beverly (42nd pick) SGA (11th pick) and CP3 (moonwalk into the Hall) His combined +/- in those contests is -162. Their combined +/-? +173. I’m sorry. Trae is not a player to build around. Not when players with huge chips on their shoulders and high team IQs salivate at the sight of him. It’s only gonna get worse after he makes the AS Team. His nonexistent off ball play, assist-hunting, and 0 defensive value is fatal to any team he plays on to the point where his high usage and ball dominance only neuters his teammates and exacerbates their flaws. His phenomenal raw production should translate to wins, no if, ands, and buts about it. I get tired of hearing about his fellow starters’ weaknesses (Bruno instead of Len) when they all have viable strengths. I’m off my soapbox, seems like I’m back to the days of trashing Joe all the time. Please discuss, call me an idiot, it’s all welcome. To begin, I'll post where I'm getting my information from. This is Trae Young's player profile on hoopstats.com: http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/atlanta-hawks/players/trae-young/profile/20/1/16 Here's what you're seeing on this site: All of Trae's raw stats, in order to calculate his NBA Efficiency number. NOTE: NBA efficiency is a volume intensive stat in which the more raw numbers you put up, the higher your efficiency number will normally be. Every opponent that Trae is directly going up against at his position . . if both players have played at least 25 minutes in the game Each player's NBA Efficiency number in that game The difference between the profiled player, and the player he's going up against, expressed in a won - loss record And the record of the team overall, when he wins or loses the matchup So let's dive into the data. Overall, Trae Young ranks 17th in the NBA, with a 25.6 NBA Efficiency rating and is 4th among PGs behind Doncic, Irving, and Lillard. When you look at Trae's personal profile, and the parameters that hoopsstats.com has put forth, Trae has won his matchup vs the PG he's going against 19 times. He's lost his matchup 10 times. And on 8 occasions, he's tied in efficiency vs the opposing guard. Trae's record: 19 - 10 - 8 For a comparison: Giannis ( the top NBA Efficiency player in the league ) is 28 - 3 - 6 Luka is 31 - 2 - 4 . . which is an absolutely ridiculous number that is mainly boosted by Luka's rebounding Kyrie is 8 - 4 - 2 Lillard is 26 - 9 - 7 One of the flaws in calculating this, is that we all know that Trae didn't guard the opposing PG the entire time he was on the court, and vice versa. This website simply calculates their NBA Efficiency number for the game, and quantifies it as a "matchup" if both players have played at least 25 minutes in the game, regardless if those minutes were against each other or not. Despite that, it is a decent way to compare production in a game, and who's production actually contributes to wins and losses because these players are mainly going up against each other. To me, there's 2 ways you can look at Trae's 19 - 10 - 8 number. You can say that Trae has played even or above his opponent 27 out of 37 times ( 73% ). Or you can say that Trae has played even or below his opponent 18 out of 37 times ( 49% ). While the site kind of dismisses the ties or playing to a draw, you kind of have to factor those in, at least from a team W - L standpoint, something they do not do. The interesting thing that this website does with these numbers, is that they also have a "sub-record" of how the team did when a player either won or lost their matchup. So let's look further at Trae and the Hawks. Trae won his matchup 19 times: Hawks are 6 - 13 Trae lost his matchup 10 times: Hawks are 0 - 10 This tells us something that pretty much all of us who watch every game, know. If Trae isn't putting up a HUGE number offensively, whether it be a lot of points, or a lot of assists, we're not winning the game . . . period. Now why could that be? Could it be that he doesn't have adequate help around him? Could it be that Trae doesn't elevate his teammates to a higher level, and needs more than 8.5 assists to do so? Here are the matchup records of the Hawks players and Hawks W - L record in those games. Young: 19 - 10 - 8 . . ( Hawks record in wins: 6 - 13 . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 10 ) Collins: 6 - 4 - 6 . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 3 - 3 . . . Hawks record in losses: 2 - 2 ) Huerter: 8 - 8 - 4 . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 4 - 4 . . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 8 ) Hunter: 6 - 22 - 7 . . ( Hawks record in wins: 1 - 5 . . . Hawks record in losses: 6 - 16 ) Reddish: 1 - 17 - 5 . ( Hawks record in wins: 0 - 1 . . . Hawks record in losses: 3 - 14 ) Parker: 5 - 10 - 4 . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 1 - 4 . . . Hawks record in losses: 3 - 7 ) Bembry: 8 - 4 - 1 . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 2 - 6 . . . Hawks record in losses: 2 - 2 ) Len: 3 - 1 - 0 . . . . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 1 - 2 . . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 1 ) Jones: 0 - 2 - 2 . . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 0 - 0 . . . Hawks record in losses: 1 - 1 ) Carter: 0 - 1 - 0 . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 0 - 0 . . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 1 ) Bruno, Crabbe, Turner, and Goodwin have not had a game in which they, and their main opponent counterpart, have played 25+ minutes in a game. When you look at those W - L profiles, it shows us what we all know, or should know. We have very few players who can out perform their opponent on a nightly basis. And despite Trae doing it more than anyone else, it didn't translate into wins, especially when Collins was out and Huerter wasn't still 100%. He just didn't have any help. The burden on Hunter and Reddish has been too much, from a production standpoint. Asking rookies who aren't in that elite tier of players to step right in and outproduce NBA vets, is unfair to them. That's why we needed our own vets who could at least do it on an occasional basis. Surprisingly, Bembry has been the one vet ( when given the minutes ), who can outproduce his counterpart. But even when he was doing it, the Hawks still lost more than they won. It's only when Collins came back into the mix, and Huerter finally snapped out of his funk, that they started outproducing their counterpart, along with Trae, that led to victories for the team. Recently, the key to our wins has been Huerter outplaying his SG counterpart, which he's done 6 times since Dec 30th, leading to 4 wins. Bottom line is that Trae is doing more than enough on offense, to have the team win more games than they have, even if his opponent is producing numbers as well. But every star player needs help, in order to win in this league. Edited January 20, 2020 by TheNorthCydeRises 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, REHawksFan said: OK so I got curious about your numbers and wanted to see for myself. And unless I'm missing something, it seems like you are off a bit. Here's what I found: Trae vs: Lowry - 2 times VanVleet - 3 times Nunn - 2 times Brogdon - 4 times Hill - 5 times Augustine - 5 times Smart - 3 times Beverly - 1 time SGA - 1 time CP3 - 2 times That totals 28 instances where the above 10 players played in the same game as Trae. However, there are also 5 instances where two players played in the same game with Trae so there were 23 actual games featuring Trae and any combination of the above players. In those 23 games, Trae has a p/m of -242. However, the overall team also had a p/m of -264. More to the point, in 13 of the 23 games, the team's p/m was worse without Trae than with Trae. And all of the above fails to consider the fact that other players have a SIGNIFICANT impact on p/m and there's no guarantee that these other PGs were even the players guarding Trae all the time or whether Trae was guarding them. Bottom line, this particular line of thinking seems pretty disingenuous and doesn't really paint an accurate picture of Trae or his ability to be the Alpha on a championship squad. Consider this: The Hawks have played 43 games this season (Trae has played 39). The Hawks overall get outscored 7.27 pts / 36 min. WITH Trae on the floor, the Hawks get outscored by 5.17 pts / 36. WITHOUT Trae, they get outscored by 11.29 pts / 36. Further, in only 10 of the 43 games have the Hawks had a net positive p/m with Trae off the court compared to on. In the other 33 games, the team is far better with Trae than without. To me its obvious. This is cherry picked games against teams in which the whole team got beat to death. I am sure you would be hard pressed to find any Hawks with a positive plus minus against teams in the top eight in either conference.. Edited January 20, 2020 by Buzzard 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REHawksFan Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 18 minutes ago, TheNorthCydeRises said: To begin, I'll post where I'm getting my information from. This is Trae Young's player profile on hoopstats.com: http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/atlanta-hawks/players/trae-young/profile/20/1/16 Here's what you're seeing on this site: All of Trae's raw stats, in order to calculate his NBA Efficiency number. NOTE: NBA efficiency is a volume intensive stat in which the more raw numbers you put up, the higher your efficiency number will normally be. Every opponent that Trae is directly going up against at his position . . if both players have played at least 25 minutes in the game Each player's NBA Efficiency number in that game The difference between the profiled player, and the player he's going up against, expressed in a won - loss record And the record of the team overall, when he wins or loses the matchup So let's dive into the data. Overall, Trae Young ranks 17th in the NBA, with a 25.6 NBA Efficiency rating and is 4th among PGs behind Doncic, Irving, and Lillard. When you look at Trae's personal profile, and the parameters that hoopsstats.com has put forth, Trae has won his matchup vs the PG he's going against 19 times. He's lost his matchup 10 times. And on 8 occasions, he's tied in efficiency vs the opposing guard. Trae's record: 19 - 10 - 8 For a comparison: Giannis ( the top NBA Efficiency player in the league ) is 28 - 3 - 6 Luka is 31 - 2 - 4 . . which is an absolutely ridiculous number that is mainly boosted by Luka's rebounding Kyrie is 8 - 4 - 2 Lillard is 26 - 9 - 7 One of the flaws in calculating this, is that we all know that Trae didn't guard the opposing PG the entire time he was on the court, and vice versa. This website simply calculates their NBA Efficiency number for the game, and quantifies it as a "matchup" if both players have played at least 25 minutes in the game, regardless if those minutes were against each other or not. Despite that, it is a decent way to compare production in a game, and who's production actually contributes to wins and losses because these players are mainly going up against each other. To me, there's 2 ways you can look at Trae's 19 - 10 - 8 number. You can say that Trae has played even or above his opponent 27 out of 37 times ( 73% ). Or you can say that Trae has played even or below his opponent 18 out of 37 times ( 49% ). While the site kind of dismisses the ties or playing to a draw, you kind of have to factor those in, at least from a team W - L standpoint, something they do not do. The interesting thing that this website does with these numbers, is that they also have a "sub-record" of how the team did when a player either won or lost their matchup. So let's look further at Trae and the Hawks. Trae won his matchup 19 times: Hawks are 6 - 13 Trae lost his matchup 10 times: Hawks are 0 - 10 This tells us something that pretty much all of us who watch every game, know. If Trae isn't putting up a HUGE number offensively, whether it be a lot of points, or a lot of assists, we're not winning the game . . . period. Now why could that be? Could it be that he doesn't have adequate help around him? Could it be that Trae doesn't elevate his teammates to a higher level, and needs more than 8.5 assists to do so? Here are the matchup records of the Hawks players and Hawks W - L record in those games. Young: 19 - 10 - 8 . . ( Hawks record in wins: 6 - 13 . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 10 ) Collins: 6 - 4 - 6 . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 3 - 3 . . . Hawks record in losses: 2 - 2 ) Huerter: 8 - 8 - 4 . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 4 - 4 . . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 8 ) Hunter: 6 - 22 - 7 . . ( Hawks record in wins: 1 - 5 . . . Hawks record in losses: 6 - 16 ) Reddish: 1 - 17 - 5 . ( Hawks record in wins: 0 - 1 . . . Hawks record in losses: 3 - 14 ) Parker: 5 - 10 - 4 . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 1 - 4 . . . Hawks record in losses: 3 - 7 ) Bembry: 8 - 4 - 1 . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 2 - 6 . . . Hawks record in losses: 2 - 2 ) Len: 3 - 1 - 0 . . . . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 1 - 2 . . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 1 ) Jones: 0 - 2 - 2 . . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 0 - 0 . . . Hawks record in losses: 1 - 1 ) Carter: 0 - 1 - 0 . . . . ( Hawks record in wins: 0 - 0 . . . Hawks record in losses: 0 - 1 ) Bruno, Crabbe, Turner, and Goodwin have not had a game in which they, and their main opponent counterpart, have played 25+ minutes in a game. When you look at those W - L profiles, it shows us what we all know, or should know. We have very few players who can out perform their opponent on a nightly basis. And despite Trae doing it more than anyone else, it didn't translate into wins, especially when Collins was out and Huerter wasn't still 100%. He just didn't have any help. The burden on Hunter and Reddish has been too much, from a production standpoint. Asking rookies who aren't in that elite tier of players to step right in and outproduce NBA vets, is unfair to them. That's why we needed our own vets who could at least do it on an occasional basis. Surprisingly, Bembry has been the one vet ( when given the minutes ), who can outproduce his counterpart. But even when he was doing it, the Hawks still lost more than they won. It's only when Collins came back into the mix, and Huerter finally snapped out of his funk, that they started outproducing their counterpart, along with Trae, that led to victories for the team. Recently, the key to our wins has been Huerter outplaying his SG counterpart, which he's done 6 times since Dec 30th, leading to 4 wins. Bottom line is that Trae is doing more than enough on offense, to have the team win more games than they have, even if his opponent is producing numbers as well. But every star player needs help, in order to win in this league. Fascinating data. Thanks for posting. Also interesting to note the following: Trae / Huerter both WON: Hawks go 2-4 Trae / JC both WON: Hawks go 1-1 Huerter / JC both WON: Hawks go 1-1 T/H/C all WIN: Hawks go 0-1 (only happened in Cleveland when JC came back from suspension) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now