Jump to content

chickenstanly

Squawkers
  • Posts

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chickenstanly

  1. Because what young Naoh will ultimately end up with is quite likely what he either earns himself or inherits. Just like the rest of us.

    Obviously, no one yet has posted any legitimate reason to believe that Noah may stay in school as a result of having a father who was a tennis player. But many of you have certainly posted this reference (father/family) when speculating about his possibly entering the draft. Is this something that he is on record as mentioning? Or simply another HawkSquawk feeding frenzy based on nothing?

    You seem to believe that just because a kid doesn't come from the ghetto and *MAY* have a comfortable future as a result of lineage, that this would be worth risking NBA millions in the event he should get hurt in college.

    I'm sorry but... "I was in France when Noah played" is really not very convincing.

  2. Many of you have mentioned the wealth of Yannick Noah. Can anyone point to some reputable estimate of his net worth?

    Also, equally important would be how much versus the NBA money of a top 2 pick?

    Is he definately in Yannick's will? For what percentage? How about brothers, sisters or other aires?

    Anything that he makes in the NBA will be HIS. And his NOW!

    My guess is that son would be able to buy and sell dad several times over within several years of NBA life.

    Howdy BHD!

  3. "Vlade was one of the most unathletic starting centers I've ever seen, he chain smoked for quite some time before 'getting serious' one year in Sacremento."

    Are you saying that chain-smoking has a negative affect on athleticism?

  4. "That's the bottom line.

    "I pray that I'm wrong, But I'm sure I'm right!"

    __________________

    How are you sure?

    I understand why you have come to your "opinion". You've done a good job of stating this.

    To me, "sure" is something that you could only be --- after the fact?

    And if you were indeed "sure", then praying that you were wrong would seem a bit silly, as it would make it impossible for your prayers to be answered.

    Like saying, "I'm sure that the Spurs won the 2005 NBA Title, but I pray that the Pistons won".

  5. Don't you all remember that everything hinges on whether or not Kwame is still available?

    Well, this time I'm sure he is! Just trade the #2 to Washington for him.

    Seriously though, it's nice to see all of you engaged in a legitimate debate this time as to who should be our pick.

    This is the way it should be in a situation where one is choosing "in the dark", so to speak.

    Lary Bird - Slow, can't defend

    Magic Johnson - No outside shot, bad knees

    Julius Erving - No outside shot, can't handle the ball

    Michael Jordan - No outside shot, only average ball handler

    Charles Barley - Overweight, undersized, no outside shot

  6. Everyone should remember that Wilt never won a championship until late in his career. And he dwarfs Jordan as being by far the most dominant player of his era.

    The 80's Lakers and Celtics were so good that could have played an all-star team made up of the rest of the league and probably won most games.

    Magic was great, but without Kareem, he would not have

    5 (if any) rings. Sorry.

    Let's flashback to the Portland team with Walton. This is

    an example of how when great big men cancel each other

    out, it all comes down to the surrounding cast. That year,

    Walton had a better team around him than Kareem and they

    defeated the Lakers in the WCF.

    The 76ers never could do it until Moses came along. As great

    as Erving, Cheeks, Toney, etc were....it still took Moses

    to allow them to get past the Celtics/Lakers. And Cheeks was a top 3 point guard. (the truth of the matter was they

    could not guard Kevin McHale, while Bird/Dr.J canceled each other out. As did Cheeks/DJ and Caldwell-B.Jones/Parrish.)

    The Jordan Bulls were an anomolie, but unless you think you have a Jordan on your hands, I wouldn't use them as a blueprint. I have my doubt whether it would even work now in the age of zones.

    I can't say I have the answer, but I'd say that you MUST have 2-3 players that are top 2-3 at their position in the league. This is for a dynasty. I think the Pistons were a freak thing and not the makings for a dynasty.

    Just look at the Lakers/Celtics for a second.

    Celtics SF Bird Top 1-2 in league

    PF McHale #1

    PG DJ Top-3

    C Chief Top 4

    Lakers SF Worthy Top 3

    C Kareem Top 1-2

    PG Magic #1

    The lakers had the advantage of better bench players

    with Mychael Thompson and McAdoo. When walton came

    to Boston, the Celtics won. With these two teams, it

    all came down to bench play as to who was better each

    year.

  7. Take the entire world as your player pool. Choose captains and pick teams.

    No matter how they were picked, there would only be ONE impossible match-up.

    Only one man who there is no answer for. Not even close.

    One man who would command the attention of multiple players,

    regardless of who was on your all-world team.

    SHAQUILLE O'NEIL !!

    Shaq is beyond the shadow of a doubt the greatest basketball

    player in the world. His numbers may not always reflect this, but it does not change the fact.

    Duncan and Garnett both put up great numbers and are

    great players. Garnett the better athlete. Duncan the

    better player.

    Neither could check Shaq or score on him at will as

    he could do them without any effort.

  8. All of you know that this type of discussion is

    not allowed by the owners of this site. They

    removed the O/T section because it invited this

    type of thing. Now ya'll are doing it on the

    basketball section ? Why ?

    Fwiw, neither of the parties are anyting more

    than a joke. Call them "Dumb and Dumber", if

    you will.

    All they have to do is give all of you two

    choices and you will oblige and pick one

    of them.

    Sad !

  9. Another comment from one who played against him:

    Bill Walton on Kevin McHale:

    "Kevin McHale was the second best low-post

    player I ever played against, after Kareem."

    Just like Barkley, Jordan, Billy Cunningham

    and many others, Walton was also aware that

    McHale played with Bird.

    Notice he didn't say 2nd best PF. He said

    "low-post player". Period.

  10. I don't think the Hawks will hire a coach until

    they have some idea of the team they will put

    on the court next season.

    That means waiting to to see who they pick

    up in the draft as well as who they may be

    able to land through FA.

    There are too any unknowns at this point and

    the coach should fit the personel and not vice-

    versa.

    Right now, there is no real team in place.

    It's much easier to fit a coach to a team than

    attempt to build a team around a coach.

  11. Was Magic the equivalent of Kobe ?

    At least Diesel's assesment of Kobe ?

    I say, Yes !

    Kareem was the equivalent of Shaq.

    How can Magic get such an overwhelming

    nod as best Laker ?

    Because he smiled a lot ?

    Not only did he have Kareem, but also

    Worthy and Jamaal Wilks before him.

    Also don't forget Norm Nixon and Scott

    in his prime. And Bob Mcadoo and Mychael

    Thompson as well.

    Bottom line:

    Magic NEVER carried anything. Those

    Lakers were great teams. Stacked teams.

    Period.

    Kareem was the go-to guy. The one that

    opened everything up for the others because

    he was un-guardable.

    My vote is Kareem.

  12. Aren't Shaq's numbers off this year ? Why not

    nominate him, too ?

    TMAC is a bum. He is still living on a rep created

    in one playof series some years ago.

    Can anyone say Chris Crawford !

    Putting up mumbers for a scrub team means nothing.

    Orland is the ultimate scrub team.

    Or is Sura now Magic Johnson ?

    When a game is played, somebody has to score,rebound,

    etc.

    If the Lakers played a rec league team, and won

    158-62, would some player who scored 25 for the

    rec league team be an NBA quality player ? No.

    Stats mean nothing except on a winning team.

    The real stars have always contrbuted to wins,

    not losses. That's what makes them great players.

    The whole idea is to win. Not whine. Which fits

    TMAC ?

  13. really hope we can get howard, okafur or smith

    if not, we'll have either go small with a guard or take a big risk on a european big, who most likely will not be a franchise player

    if we go small, we may get a franchise point, but we will still have the weakness we have right now, the paint

    ________________________________________

    This is an interesting thought. Why has this board

    been so quiet on JR Smith ?

    It seems that Howard has become this years version

    of Kwame Brown with this group.

    Not that Howard doesn't have potential, but that

    is doesn't excuse such a fixation on a high school

    player.

    Just like the draft containing Kwame a couple of

    years ago, there are no certain bets like Shaq

    or Duncan this year. So it seems foolish to fixate.

    Being from Gerogia or Atlanta has no importance

    whatsoever.

  14. 1. Bob Petit.

    2. Elvin Hayes

    3. Karl Malone

    4. Tim Duncan

    5. Hakeem Olajuwaun when Sampson played....

    6. Spencer Heywood.

    7. Connie Hawkins

    8. Kevin Garnett

    9. Charles Barkley

    10.Tom Chambers

    __________________________

    Where's McHale ?

    Ask Barkley to compare McHale to Duncan. See

    what he says. It would be interesting.

    Barkley once said that McHale "was the best

    player he ever played against in his life".

    Duncan is comparable. The rest need not apply.

    Hakeem is a center. Malone has longevity but

    nowhere near the shear talent.

    If stats were a measuring stick, Russell would

    have been considered only "average". You can't

    go on stats.

  15. 1990-89 Pistons - Thomas (best example of a "team" over a superstar even though Thomas is a top 10 PG of all time)

    1988-84 Lakers or Celtics - Magic or Bird (best or 2nd best player)

    1983 Sixer - MVP Moses Malone

    1982 Lakers - Magic

    1981 Celtics - Bird

    1980 Lakers - Magic

    ______________________________________________

    1990-89 Best Player ..... Jordan

    1988-84 Best player ..... Kareem as well

    1983..................... Some would still say Kareem

    1982..................... Kareem

    1981...................... Kareem

    1980...................... Kareem

    But your point is valid.

×
×
  • Create New...