BimboColes

JJ and Teague for Curry, Lee, and Udoh(works in NBA trade machine).... *nuts myself*

They are such homers, it's hilarious. And I love every second of it.

Jamal/Marvin/Mo/Teague/10 (lottery protected) firsts. We are the worst team ever at drafting, so no need to keep any of those picks. :biggrin:

I said the team + what he brings back. I.e, he brings back a point guard who scores 75% of what he is now and increases the rest of the team's scoring by getting them better shots that covers the other 25% of JC's former scoring. Does that make sense? His production can be replaced by the team. It's the WAY he produces(1 on 1, creating his own shot, etc.) that can't be. But if we have a good point who can move the ball and keep people involved, we won't need Jamal to come out and "show off".

The deals we are already talking about(Sessions/Brooks) are "backup" deals IMO. If they don't go through with those what is there left to do?

Sad but true. I wish Mr. Blank would buy the other 3 teams too. He actually cares about winning.

Best thing about this poll are the ZERO votes for Bibby/Teague :tongue: I vote Sessions. He's(from what I've seen) a PG in his heart. Brooks is a SG at heart that was forced to PG due to his 5'9" height.

Sup yall, (relatively) long time lurker, first time poster. You can tell by my screen name I know my Hawks(first random player I thought of haha) I would trade Jamal for these reasons: -biggest return off trade -his scoring can be replaced -we will get nothing when he walks after the season He is the best player out of the 3, but that is also the biggest reason we have to trade him. I also feel that the production he brings can be filled in by the rest of the team + what he brings back more so than in Marvin's case.