I would argue that the Hawks' half court offense has many more possible outcomes than other good teams' offenses. The Lakers, Cavs, and Heat consistently see one guy pound the ball and go for 25+ every night. We consistently have 5 or 6 with double digit points. We pass in to the low post a lot, and Josh gets a lot of assists because of that. He's exciting to watch this year, because he's seeing perimeter shooters get open as he drives. Our half court offense does end up being 1on1 a chunk of the time, but no more than anyone else's. We spread the ball around a lot, create a diverse array of plays, and of course have a ridiculous transition game. All in all it's an exciting, powerful package. It doesn't involve fancy set plays with multiple players shifting around away from the ball as much, but it does involve a team effort with multiple players consistently racking up assists (as opposed to the Suns, who have one playmaker).
And you can see Woodson at work there. I'm not sure you can design an offense that exploits the wildly varied offensive styles of each of our players. Josh, Al, Joe, Mike, and Marvin all have totally different methods of scoring. And since they've played together for a while now, they know what each other can do. It's kind of absurd to have a rigid idea of what an aesthetically pleasing NBA offense should be and criticize a 10 - 2 team's offense for not matching a preconceived conceptual model that has no basis in reality. A reality that has been years in the making.