sasuke

Sund's best move this season was not to sign Shaq.

He will not resign with a soon to be NY team that has an owner that don't care to spend money, but, he will love to come here, a smaller market with an ownership that won't pay luxury tax to save their lives?

"Kufus" has a minimum contract & the 2 1rst rouders where for the same year. that's a pretty good salary dump move. now, what I want you to se is Marvin's horrible contract that, by no means, gives you cap & or payroll relieve. Hinrich is an expiring, but, isn't Jefferson's full amount of $ that they can easily find with another team with probably better picks & able to add 3 mill cash.

Who else is going to be the 1rst option? Al doesn't get enough touches, Smoove has no BB IQ, Crawford is not consistent & a ball-hog. Of course, JJ with his contract taking almost one third of our cap there's no way you can have another 1b or 1c. Coursed the day, hour, minute, second, millisecond & nanosecond in which Sund handed out that damned contract. So, there you have it ,for the next 5 years, your #1 option that in his prime din't do it, don't think he can do it now or later.

OKC wanting to move Westbrook it's all speculation & nothing more. So.....NJ will literally give 2 lotto picks, Derick Favors & Devin Harris for Al & Kirk.................go to love this, LMAO!!!!!!!!!

So Marvin is the best SF they can get in the off-season??????? Is that pakcage the best offer that they wold get for big Al????? I love the effort but I think Marvin has an superduperultraoverrated trade value on this board.

That is what Sund could've done in regards of Joe, but he didn't & now we are doomed for 5 more years. He said "Dirk is underpaid" in the topic description. I think LeBron is underpaid too. Now, I think Joe Johnson & diarrhea symptoms start right away.

They aren't going to run a 3 man rotation on the back court. Westbrook & Maynor will play the 1 without question & Harden is going to play 30 + minutes next season & possibly a starter. Whomever is going to be Harden's back up is going to play 18- minutes & they will not pay Crawford his $ just to play that role.

so...what does OKC needs Jamal for???????

1 - It isn't. Pierce @ that time > JJ now & then, period. 2 - Seattle wanted to rebuild trough the draft & to get under the cap, so in a similar situation your scenario isn't going to get it done. 3 & 4 - So, there's NY, Miami & us offering the same $ to Dalembert. You really think he's going to end up here??????? No, hell no. Isn't happening. Sorry. Howard isn't coming here & neither CP3. Let's get real. Horford is better than Lopez, no thanks. Bogut is close to Al when injured, but healthy is > Al so I don't think that Bucks will do it in real life. Marc Gasol > Al & don't make sense for Memphis to do that trade. How are you going to get captain Jack? We have our Pietrus & our Ariza, his name is Marvin Williams & is overpaid. We don't need another overpaid player like Ariza or Marvin, no thanks. Give me something feasible that can, indeed, make us contenders with the posibility of loosing our six man & other teams also getting better.

LeBron???????

1 - JJ isn't better than Pierce was back then. 2 - Where is our # 5 overall pick & our cap space to get our Allen? 3 - Who will be our KG that would sign the extension here & not on other big market if we give up Al? 4 - How are you going to manage realistically our cap situation so we can ad role players after the trade for our KG? Switching our best players for other players with equal talent isn't going to do too much. We need to add talent while keeping our best players & we don't have cap space &/or attractive picks to do so. How could we do it????????

Give Harden the same mins that JJ & he will be as good or better than JJ next season, not even on his prime & with a rookie contract. That's why this deal doesn't make any sense at all for OKC.

With JJ's contract taking like something close to 30% of our cap, exiting his prime & entering the decline, a 8 mill bad contract in Marvin, no cash & non attractive picks to package, a ownership reluctant to spend on tax. I'll going to ask you this: What on God's green earth can you do to turn this team in to a contender with no flexibility? You can't get anything back for Marvin, & for Joe........best case scenario maybe Gasol or Deng but still sounds not very realistic cuz, man, JJ's contract is just way to much for what he does. What can we do REALISTICALLY?

This trade is horrible. We end up with 0 offense from our bigs. And I have no idea why would Sacramento take Jamison.

Then why in hell would they give us Harden for Joe?????????

TPE can't be combined with any contract to match salaries & there's no way in hell they give us the 4th pick for Joe.

Actually, that pick finished as the 1rst overall & the 4rth is the Cavs original pick.

Bogut with all the injuries is still better than Smoove, It will be crazy to turn down Bogut for Smoove.

The only way a rebuilding team takes on a huge contract is if unprotected ,low protected picks or multiple picks are coming too. Other than that, it's a no no. As for Smoove, they have 0 need for him, they are loaded @ the 4. They are happy with Hickson. PS: This might sound crazy, but I'm pretty sure that if you ask a contender to pick between Smoove & Varejao, most of them, if not all, will go for Varejao.

Clippers just don't believe in having bad contracts. Look what they did, traded an unprotected pick to shed Davis. They are extreme penny pinchers. Marvin isn't going there. As for Davis, we will have like 55 mill locked on just 4 players while running away from the tax. That's not what you want.

A won't happen in a million years. B I'm sure Cavs will do it in a heartbeat. Not so sure if we need Baron's contract though.

No, unless in the new CBA there's no limit in cash to use on trades, then you could do JJ & 120 mill cash for player x & y.