Jump to content

Lurker

Squawkers
  • Posts

    4,357
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Lurker

  1. What I mean is even if he wasn’t shooting 3’s, I don’t think he’d be banging around down low because he’s too afraid to get hurt. And that’s going to leave Atlanta with the same problem even if he’s not taking 3’s, only one big is willing to be reckless/aggressive on the glass while starting, because Horford will continue to just drift around the perimeter, just inside the arc.

  2. Low expectations, but in the short way of putting it, if Atlanta can at least survive this stretch of games with 14 or 15 wins, they SHOULD be fine. There’s a 28 game stretch after that which is relatively light. I can’t remember exactly how many teams that are as good or maybe better but it’s not that high. But this stretch really needs to be taken advantage of this time, if it’s a repeat of the first stretch like that, they’re going to be dead in the water going forward.

    Looking at the NBA itself, I hate to say it but it may very well be only three teams matter, and the other teams should just go play Xbox.

  3. My two cents and some change on Horford is I don't think him NOT shooting threes makes much of a difference. He's showing signs lately that he is playing to not get hurt more than to try to win (which this is a dangerous game to play in both life and sports, if you're just trying to not get hurt, odds are you're going to get hurt).

    Besides, if he is playing well, he has no good post moves from what I have seen, his only game is really the pnr and pnp. And people have been crying lately for a big that operates only in the post, right?

    Now I was for real when I looked at the schedule and said I was fine with 2-2 in this 4 game stretch and saw this as a schedule loss. Now I didn't know that it'd come with Teague going down for a few games and thanks to Schröder's regression, struggles against Utah and Brooklyn. And a very legit chance of it being 3-1 if the bench wasn't total garbage in Minnesota.

  4. Can make a very legitimate argument that if Teague doesn’t get hurt or we even have an average Schröder vs Utah and Brooklyn, Atlanta is 13-5 right now. With some very concerning games in there though (Detroit, the first Boston game, and the first Minnesota game).

    Hasn’t really been any rhyme or reason as to how they’ve played though so far. If you saw the Brooklyn and Cleveland games only, you’d be scratching your head at how Atlanta blew out a decent Boston team and weathered the storm vs Memphis and came back to dominate the 2nd half.

    I don't think they win in San Antonio but if the starters continue playing well I think they can beat everyone in this tough stretch except for SA and a split vs OKC.

  5. 44 minutes ago, JTB said:

    Ok but how exactly do you know that? Lol...hell there were plenty of fans saying teague will never be an all star pg and you saw what happened last year...it's very possible that Teague can develop that mid range shot. Hell I rather him and horford try to workout together to develop that shot before we seriously consider trading him especially before we give Dennis control of buds offense at point.

     

    damn I know it's been bad and we are all upset including me but it's not "tank time"...and suggesting we trade Teague and roll with Dennis means your suggesting we tank

     

     

    You’re asking for him to solve a major problem, the only time he can do so is the offseason.

    Look, this offense is going to struggle against good defenses as long as teams see Horford as a laughable offensive threat (stick their best defensive big man on Millsap) and teams force Teague and Schröder to shoot jumpers and they miss them. The best choice at this point is to take this season off and tank.

  6. 5 minutes ago, Hawkmoor said:

    I disagree. If you got somebody who can rebound, that makes EVERYBODY better. There is less pressure to make the first shot because you know you have someone who can go get it.  With the system the hawks have, you can live with the players they have if you can rebound the ball.

    In your mind, offensive rebounds have to be emphasized then when it's not.

  7. 11 minutes ago, JTB said:

    I disagree that Bazemore is not a starter...not just because I like him as a player but he has shown that he can start and be effective in the small amount of starts he's had.

    Now Bazemore may not be starting SF but he's definitely a legit starting SG based on the starts he's had this season.

    Bazemore’s due for regression, as I’m completely selling on the idea he’s a 40%+ 3 point shooter on high-ish volume and he has a lot of trouble with finishing in traffic. He’s a poor man’s Barnes with the Clippers at best. 9 PTS per game, 3 rebounds, 2 assists, 1.5 steal, .5 block.

  8. 1 hour ago, Hawkmoor said:

    The team isn't flawed, they just need someone LEGIT on the boards. Somebody that's paid to do just THAT. Once that is done, everything else will fall into place.

    It’s more than just “oh, put in a rim protector and fierce rebounder and it will solve everything!”

    Korver’s days of being a help while playing big minutes are donezo and Bazemore is not a starter.

    There’s basically three spots in the starting lineup that need to be changed along with the bench upgraded and the only way to do so is to completely blow the team up and tank.

  9. Sadly it isn't a complete overreaction. Teams are going to continue to constantly crash the boards until it wakes them up and lets them know they need to either have a SF with PF size starting or give up the idea of a small frontcourt entirely.

×
×
  • Create New...