Jump to content

kg01

Squawkers
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,321

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Everything posted by kg01

  1. kg01
    Put Bey out of his misery. If that level of play is ok, AJ must be shooting at the wrong basket in practice.
  2. kg01
    The backwards airball layup got you? Heh Playing chess not checkers, huh?
  3. kg01
    Lol @ Kwin making no subs and just kinda watching the 3rd qtr just like the rest of us.
  4. kg01
    Still seems like more of an offseason move to me. The kiss offer doesn't expire, btw.
  5. kg01
    I truly don't believe that rumor. I want it to be true but I just don't buy it. If you're them, wouldn't you trade Ingram before trading either Jones or Murphy?
  6. kg01
    I mentioned a few days ago that them paying Jones and Murphy could be a problem for them. However, that's not a problem they have to address before this deadline. These reports smell like day-old hot dog water.
  7. kg01
    I stand by what I said weeks ago, of they can get Herb and Alvarado, I'm kissin' soth full on the mouth. That said, this sounds like the same yearn-alism that tells fans ATL "needs" to trade so-and-so for "financial reasons". Sounds semi-plausible but could be completely false.
  8. kg01
    Agree, way too thin for the Lakers. We shld add a few picks. And Trae.
  9. kg01
    Is Jake sure the Lakers don't want AJ and Kobe too?
  10. kg01
    Pat E. is untouchable in my book.
  11. kg01
    I dunno. I'm just the idea guy. You're head of implementation.
  12. kg01
    TPE or sunthin' for PJ Wash and leggo. We ain't that far out from it.
  13. kg01
    Bey 4 Grimes feels more rite.
  14. kg01
    I can't be the only one that notices, when the unbiased numbers don't match the opinion, the numbers get ignored. Odd. Screeeeeeeech (Goal posts moving sound)
  15. kg01
    Trae and picks for Lowry? Ya know, since Trae might/did/didnt/never asked out.
  16. kg01
    This isn't a prediction. This is you saying what Trae has done.
  17. kg01
    He went further than that. If I can figure how to jump back in this thread, I'll find the post.
  18. kg01
    Well he's not gonna play pg here so no need to even go there. Also, explain why he's been not great on D even in the non-Trae minutes. And I take shots at you but I don't cross lines of being purposely insulting like that. I question your takes, I don't question your manhood or intelligence.
  19. kg01
    You've gone from saying Trae asked out, to saying he didn't. Then he was gonna ask out, but didn't. Now you're saying he heard he was gonna ask out. I'll just wait for when you admit that didn't happen either.
  20. kg01
    Goalpost moving and there's no need to insult the man. If you have a good point, just make it.
  21. kg01
    I'm super glad for the game winners but folks see the last play and literally forget everything else. Like 2 plays before that we 'ran offense' that resulted in panic passes and bad shots. I want Murray here but he is in no way a better PG. Sheesh.
  22. kg01
    I'd take PJ Washington, give them Bey.
  23. kg01
    And dang, if he couldn't stop Grant, who was on Brogdon? Odd no one makes the connection that IND's guards can't guard.
  24. kg01
    This can't be right. Eggsperts told me he was 'the answer' for them. Seriously though, they haven't been able to stop a nose bleed. Just outscore folks. Times gonna run out on them.
  25. kg01
    Yeah, I don't really want Murray traded either. But I'm also not gonna throw away a year+ of seeing him play and use these last 2 games as 'proof' he should be 'the guy' here. It (Trae+Murray) can work, we just need the wing and C fixed.
×
×
  • Create New...