Guest Posted May 27, 2003 Report Share Posted May 27, 2003 Why expect him to be a great defensive player now." I never said I expect him to be a great defensive player.I said he should be good enough so that he doesn't give up what he produces.Does that mean he has to be great?NO it doesn't. Dog is a worse defender than I remember him being with the Bucks.Is it because of the knee injuries he suffered last year with the Bucks? Possibly...Bucks fans warned of his knee problems when he was traded here. What really matter is this team is not working.And it needs to be corrected.You preach we are built for offense, but even if we had a good PG we wouldn't be any better than the Bucks and they got thrown out of the first round.Even if we average 99PPG giving up 97PPG we aren't going to get very far are we?Get thrown out by Detroit and New Jersey like Orlando and the Bucks did.If we had a good PG that's probably the best we do....Not good enough. It doesn't really even matter what was thought last year.We were speaking about how good the team was going to be before we saw it on the court.That was a mistake myself and others made. But the Dog/Baker like combo of Dog and Reef isn't working and it probably will not win. If we hire Mike Dunleavy to could Dog/Baker we'll get the same results the Bucks got in the mid 90's... Horrible teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 27, 2003 Report Share Posted May 27, 2003 I knew this team was gunna be bad when we allowed the Nuggets to comeback from 30 points down.Even though the Hawks still ended up winning that game how do you blow a 30 pt lead to Denver?The team was doomed at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now