Plainview1981 Posted May 22, 2004 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2004 They didn't spread the floor well enough, they didn't have enough athleticism, and the key : THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE HEART THAT SJAX WOULD BRING! " They didn't have enough talent. And Stephen Jackson doesn't do much to upgrade that either. 33% in three's is mediocre. You call his second half "Maturing" I call it not playing in a real system and players just allowed to do pretty much what they pleased AND LOSE. This same "system" made alot players that really suck look like good players much like as I said before Chris Crawford. There is no reason why this guy should be in the NBA. What has he ever done to make himself worthy of being a NBA player? He was a Pete Babcock mistake. If it wasn't for Pete, you can bet Crawford would be in the NBL or whereever else. Jackson is no better than Hedo and that's why I don't see much change if you switched the two. The Lakers are also playing much better defense than they did a year ago...You rant on and on about this open shots. Do you think they'd be left open if they were making them? Even the Spurs at they're best wouldn't have won this series. They won both games ON THEIR HOME COURT and alot of teams have done that. Just look at the Heat, they won all the home games but 1? Anybody can beat any body at home.... The Spurs just couldn't win the road games. Quit making excuses and saying if they'd have this guy....If they would have had that guy because it doesn't even matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now