first off i understood that if we wanted to get better we need somebody a little better than teague at the point, however i still love what both harris & teague bring to the table enough to have them come of my bench as a change of pace. i felt for sure sense we let harris go, it only makes sense to resign teague.why would we trade teague for jennings somebody that we beat handily last yr.im hearing jennings wants almost 12 mill. but we wouldnt even sniff at kyrie erving. i dont understand that. kyrie ervin is a big name & also somebody that is potentialy unstoppable on any given night which is somebody a team like the hawks could use while trying to gain a reputation. but we know how some of these GMs are, if they did not bring a player in on their watch there is no redeeming value in that gms eyes, so its easy to let go.