Jump to content

randawg91

Squawkers
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by randawg91

  1. It really was unbelievable how much they showed him last night
  2. We might need a big, but honestly if we're just going for a tall defensive center, then we should just try our luck with Tavares. The only bigs I see that would really fit our system would be Lopez, Aldridge or Gasol, and those would only be necessary if we didn't sign Millsap. All in all, I think we need a SF
  3. People, Hotlanta is trolling. There's no way he's being serious here.
  4. Yep that makes more sense than my response, I read his post as asking whether or not it would affect our on court performance. The value of our TV deal directly and substantially affects our team's value, but I don't think that it makes a big difference in terms of how we perform (thankfully)
  5. I doubt it tbh. Unlike MLB, NBA has a pretty hard cap on how much you can spend. Pretty much all NBA teams will spend that allotted money if it will make the team better.
  6. Wtf? Where did that come from?
  7. Man he has an extremely likable presence, but he also knows his stuff. Consider me a fan.
  8. If a mid-round rookie isn't getting minutes on the team with the 2nd best record in the entire league, that plays in an advanced system, and is loaded at his position, he's a bust. I mean come on man, that's just obvious. /sarcasm
  9. Haha well I know a lot of people have grey patches of hair that are birthmarks, didn't know if that might be the case here. Thanks!
  10. Just remember, we get to swap with the Nets. Definitely have a chance at a top 10 pick
  11. Great post, it was Ibaka that met with him though
  12. Hahah wow that was freakin hilarious. "For the love of all that's holy"
  13. Sorry, the link to the video doesn't really work with how they set up their website. In that video, after Bud is done talking, it cuts to Korver talking about him as a coach. Just some incredibly strong statements on his behalf. Said that he's the best coach he's ever been around, that he gets the X's and O's, but also understands the personal relationship side with the players, and also that players just LOVE playing here. Obviously just reiterating what we all think, but it's nice to hear it from a player.
  14. Bulls are still the biggest threat imo. We won by a good margin, but that was still a tough game.
  15. Yep, he's awesome for his on-ball D and for driving to the rim. I just wish he ran the offense a little bit better, sometimes it feels like he's looking to get to the rim a little too much. Definitely being nitpicky though
  16. Eh, they actually covered us pretty well last night on SC. After showing our highlights, then an interview of Horf, they had a "Are Hawks really this good?" discussion. They all said yes.
  17. Wow, he's just dishing out HUGE praise for our squad. Serious respect from a great coach. http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/celtics/post/_/id/4717114/copy-machine-cs-want-to-soar-like-hawks?ex_cid=espnapi_public Copy Machine? C's Want to Soar Like Hawks BOSTON -- You get the sense that Boston Celtics coach Brad Stevens has been watching a lot of Atlanta Hawks games, and not just to check in on former Butler University pupil Shelvin Mack. Stevens flat-out gushes when he talks about the Hawks and the inspired brand of basketball they've played since the end of last season. In a way, Atlanta offers a bit of a blueprint on how a superstar-less team can thrive with pure team basketball. Atlanta showcased that Wednesday night as part of a 105-91 triumph at TD Garden in which it rested starters Al Horford and Kyle Korver, two of its most skilled individual players. The Hawks have won 24 of their last 26 games, own a four-game lead atop the Eastern Conference and have the second-best record in basketball behind Golden State. As Boston overhauls its roster, having already shipped out stars Rajon Rondo and Jeff Green as part of an in-season change to its rebuilding direction, Stevens was asked if the Hawks serve as a bit of a guide on how to win without elite talent. “I think you have to look and redefine who the superstars are with our own eyes every day," Stevens said. "And so I would argue that they’ve got a couple of guys on their way, and I don’t know what qualifies as a superstar but I know this: Nobody in the league can keep Jeff Teaguein front of them. Nobody. And [Dennis] Schröder -- I’m not saying he’s a superstar yet; he’s a young kid -- but nobody can keep him in front of them. And then they space it with shooters. So now it’s a basketball team, right? "And [Paul] Millsap’s been an All-Star. [Al] Horford didn’t play tonight, he’s been an All-Star. [Kyle] Korver didn’t play tonight, he’s a really good player. So they’ve got a great group and it fits well, and you might have a budding superstar in that group, right? [+] Enlarge "The other thing that I’d say about them that stands out, that jumps off the page -- jumps on the page when you’re coaching against them, jumps off the page when you’re watching film -- big-time savvy. The game comesreally easy to them. It’s slow on defense; they can see things coming. They play well together. They know the biggest threats; they react to the biggest threats. And offense, they stay spaced and make the right basketball play time and again. "I agree with you that the superstar thing is a big part of this, but there’s something to be said about a group that just -- it’s like a machine. I mean, they’re a machine. They’ve really got a good thing going already." No one appreciates the beauty of team basketball more than Stevens, and he already had spent much of his pregame chat with reporters raving about the Hawks, their "connected" play, their "team-ness" and how "unselfish" they are. Stevens often is effusive in his praise of opponents, but he went out of his way to praise Atlanta's brand of ball. He said his coaching staff even used the Hawks as a bit of a target for Boston's own young players. "We had a long talk [Wednesday] as a staff, we all want these guys to all be able to do things that the Teagues, the Korvers and those guys do on an every-night basis," Stevens said. "I think that’s part of the process." If the Celtics are looking for a blueprint to follow as part of their own rebuild -- both on the court and with roster construction -- they would be wise to examine what Atlanta has done. On the court, the Hawks run the motion-heavy, pass-happy, up-tempo offense that Stevens desires from his team. Defensively, the Hawks put themselves in all the right spots and work together to cover missteps, while adding some physicality despite their lack of front-line size. "They just play the right way," Stevens said. "Defensively, they are very connected. They play very hard and the numbers bear that out. And, offensively, I think they are one of the elite teams in the league, just because of the way they spread the floor, the multiple skilled bigs that they have that allow them to play -- either with rolling, but also with driving and spacing. Then you’ve got guards, you’ve got two guards that can get wherever they want to go with the ball. And then guys that can shoot around them. Heck of a mix." So how did the Hawks get where they are? There was a lot of maneuvering necessary when general manager Danny Ferry took over a team that was stuck in a vicious cycle of early playoff defeats. But here's a snapshot at how this year's team was constructed: STARTERS • Teague (19th overall pick by Atlanta in 2009) re-signed for four years, $32 million in July 2013. • DeMarre Carroll (27th overall pick by Memphis in 2009) signed as free agent (two years, $5 million) in August 2013. • Korver (51st overall pick by Brooklyn in 2003) received in trade from Bulls for cash; re-signed to four-year, $24 million contract in July 2013. • Millsap (47th overall pick by Utah in 2006) signed as free agent (two years, $19 million) in July 2013. • Horford (third overall pick by Atlanta in 2007) re-signed to five-year, $60 million deal in November 2010. ROLE PLAYERS • Thabo Sefolosha (13th overall pick by Philadelphia in 2006) received in trade for Sofoklis Schortsanitis in July 2014. • Schröder (17th overall pick by Atlanta in 2013) signed to rookie deal in July 2013. • Pero Antić (undrafted) signed to two-year, $2.45 million deal in July 2014. • Mike Scott (43rd overall pick by Atlanta in 2012) re-signed to three-year, $10 million deal in August 2014. • Kent Bazemore (undrafted) signed a two-year, $4 million deal in September 2014. The fact that the Hawks have only one high-lottery player -- Horford -- is an encouraging sign for Boston. The Celtics have a treasure chest of future draft picks, but naysayers often lament that few of those picks even have potential to be lottery selections. The Hawks' roster construction shows that talent can be found all over the draft. What's more important is finding the right mix of players at the right value, regardless whether you draft and develop those bodies or seek them via the trade route. Atlanta even struck out at times in its recent pursuits of big-ticket free agents and it might have been the best thing to happen to the team. It gave the right coach the right mix of young, hungry players who have thrived since the end of last season. Boston's stash of picks and looming cap space will give the Celtics a similar freedom while attempting to build. The Hawks are a reminder that you don't necessarily have to hit a home run in free agency, but a couple of doubles or triples along the way with some of the less-marquee names helps put runs on the board. After Wednesday's game, Avery Bradley came away echoing his coach's sentiments when he said, "They're like a machine." The Celtics don't necessarily have to follow the exact same blueprint, but in a lot of ways it wouldn't be bad to be a copy machine.
  18. Yeah, it's tough because there are several variables. I think the fact that Korver has the best 3pt% of any shooter on the all time 3's list (barely edges out Steve Nash, but is considerably better than allen and miller fyi) is pretty telling. Also, he has the highest free throw % so far this season, but curry is right behind him so that's not really too convincing. Sadly, I haven't found a great site for advanced stats like they have for baseball
  19. My friend says that Steph Curry is. Now, there's no doubt that Curry is the better player. Korver has a waaaayyyy higher fg%, but my friend's point is that Curry makes a ton of his own shots, which is valid. Do y'all have any stats or articles to help me out? Maybe something like Korver having a better catch and shoot percentage? Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...