MrYellow

Keeping Korver untouchable IS the smartest thing to do period. That's not on the table.

Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of a big front court and the players we currently have at 2/3, but it wouldn't be my Plan A.

two rookies and Thabo, we're safe as houses.

"If you can't improve..." you correctly wrote. So "if you can't" means there is a Plan A. All those who wrote here see the Sap-Al-H as the plan A. It's different.

That's the point! Our major weakness was the SF position, so you think that's what we are going to improve in this FA. If we sign DH and keep Al we have a fantastic 4/5 rotation, but even if Sap plays the 3 for 10 minutes, we still have the same identical weakness at the three for 38 minutes. Is that clear? we improve (because it's an improvement) in a "sector" which is already quite well covered, while we leave our uncovered sector pretty much untouched.

Nonono, the huge Liability would be when Sap plays 4 and Al/DH is on the bench. Liability in the sense that is our weaker role

Despite this, we don't have the assets to get to him either, and he's been included in our BU pg list? it's just silly.

Indeed Horford's basic value is not at stake, it's just the contract vis-à-vis his marginal characteristics. With Rudy we have a major problem from the beginning.

He's an inefficient player, extremely overrated.

Rudy Gay is everything but what we need.

As if we need an insider to know that...

My ideas: - a defensive one (Livingston, he would be great) - a cheap one (Burke, even if he sucks) - an experienced one opportunity (Jack?)

Bledsoe?!?!

Game 1 : 12 R, they lost. game 4: they lost. The presence of Bogut was not the discriminant

Btw a 5y Max deal frightens me too.

* multiple sources, they like that "multiple", enhances false credibility.

His price: 0.

He picked a hero-ball team over the team who CREATED him as a player. No thanks.

if bud is ok with howard, I'm ok with Howard.

Muscala can be easily traded for free I guess (even if I would never do that).

you know that's false, right?

Splitter learnt how to shoot FTs in two months with our coaching stuff (and previously he was in SA, not neverland), there's hope.

You still don't get my point, maybe I didn't write it properly. Having the three on the team would be GREAT, there's nothing bad with that (or better, it depends on Dwight). BUT, is it really worth having a fantastic 4-5 rotation and a HUGE LIABILITY as a SF?

That's a really good option, of course, but I'd focus on completing he roster first, and then add options

They started losing before Bogut went out, and still their best lineup was with Bogut on the bench. It's a big line up which has to settle against a small one, not vice versa.