Please help me understand why a team would give up significant depth/value for Durant. He has already shown what he can(‘t) accomplish on a poorly built team without proper depth. We need ballers, not divas. Players that raise the tide, not install personal jets to control the ocean’s water pressure…
Gross — Losing the trade on the court and on the balance sheet. Has Ingram ever shown the ability to lead? At his price, leading is an expectation. I don’t see it.
I’m so curious what they are offering that would, in their eyes, require OO to be added. He isn’t a trade topper. He changes the entire concept of the trade. Hold steady, Landry…
Nick refused because he thought you deserved (2) nights for a protected 2nd round pick. He obviously misunderstood your use of protection in this context.