I have avoided the Teague/Jennings (and Ellis) debate until now, but I find it important to add.... Whenever we have played the Bucks in the past, the chat (and forum I am guessing) TEARS Jennings up, thanking our lucky stars that we don't have to deal with his terrible shot selection, pouty attitude and irrational confidence. But now out of nowhere when we talk about getting him, half the board somehow starts to love him? I for one still hope the Hawks don't have to put up with him. He has only shot above 40% in his career versus 9 teams: Charlotte, Detroit, GS, Houston, LAC, Brooklyn, NYK, Portland, and Sacramento. This dude is a mainly offense player who isn't even good on offense. He has been in the league for 4 years and hasn't improved AT ALL. So tell me, why in the world would you pay him 33-50% more than you would pay Jeff Teague, a player who has shown marked development in the past few seasons....?