Iman Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Sports Unlimited on Comcast Sports South has the Hawks duo on tonite at 6pm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 I know...He just said that trading Dog was a pure salary cap move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 It sounds like Vaughn will be the backup and was brought here to be so. They don't seem to impressed with Dan. I've not been Dan's biggest fan...But you'd think he could atleast beat out Vaughn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iman Posted October 28, 2003 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Oops, just realized I called the topic King as opposed to Knight, I always do that, Billy King is just more of a basketball name in my mind I guess..lol. Yup, they kept the talk very politically corredt. I liked how Stotts kept apologizing to Big Dogg and his skills about how happy he was about the current roster. I guess the most interesting topic for those who missed the show were the comments about Dermarr. A caller asked how we let an athlete/draft pick like that get away and Billy Knight explained that they didnt offer Dermarr a contract extension offer and he went to another team (Memphis) and basically they just planned on not having him. Matt Stewart, the host, mentioned that Dermarr had now been cut by Phoenix and that was it, they went to another topic. Basically it sounded like they figure what we have (Dion, Jackson, Diaw) has about the same upside as Dermarr. I really liked Dermarr but I have to agree. Other topics were how they liked players that could play multiple positions and even mentioned that to be a strength of JT. They mentioned how Shareef's back would have kept most players out of the last 20 or so games last year. They figured Crawford may get some minutes at PF but they didnt think he had the same explosiveness he had before the injuries. Knight wouldnt say that Ekezie would have made the team if not injured or that he would have even helped much. Overall they seemed to be trying to hide their optimism. Coach Stotts even had a nice analogy that we really didnt lose 20 ppg losing Big Dogg, we just lost about 5ppg because Jackson will probably give them about 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 I do think that despite losing Dog the team can atleast repeat the 94PPG effort last year. I don't we'll drop to 90 or anything like that. I really don't understand how they can be optimistic though.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now