tmac13 Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 Not only about Woodson's ability to utilize his talents but in general about Woodsons decision making process..For example, why does Woodson insist on playing one of his awful centers all the time. Collier is just awful, Drobs has the game of a 6'3" shooting guard(all outside shooting , NO DEFENSE, NO REBOUNDING), Ekezzie has a 1" vertical leap, and might hit 30 percent if he shot all by himself about 2 feet from the basket. Why not just let Walker play the 5, have Harrington at the 4, Smoove and Chills at the 3, Delk as much as possible at the 2, and let Diaw and Ivy split time at the point. Walker has at least as much of a chance to defend the post as Drobs or Collier, he would make the opposing center work on defense, and is a much better rebounder than either one. Harrington could play what appears to be his more natural 4 spot, and we don't hold back the developement of the young guys..Why not let Diaw and Ivy play alot to see if either has any future..Lue has a decent game occasionally but is obviously nothing more than a backup in this league. Anderson needs to go, and Donta needs a few minutes..Lets see what these guys can do.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakin Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 should get a chance tonite if lues out. im still waiting to see what you and some others seem to believe makes diaw deserving of any more minutes than hes gotten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmac13 Posted February 5, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 We all know Lue is nothing but a backup and Anderson is past his time..Why not see if Diaw and Ivy can play..I personally believe Diaw has some potential..Ivy, I still can't believe we selected him over Duhon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 In all fairness, Ivey and Duhon are both exceptional for 2nd rounders. And it's never easy to project how college players will do with the pros. (See:Duke syndrome) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurider05 Posted February 6, 2005 Report Share Posted February 6, 2005 Samething I have been saying all year long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted February 6, 2005 Report Share Posted February 6, 2005 Billy Knight is growing a reputation for drafting unproductive players. You see J-Chill's line tonight? 3 rebounds, 4assists along with 2 whole points in 30 minutes. Geez that dude is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted February 6, 2005 Report Share Posted February 6, 2005 Well in all fairness he got a player in Smith that could have been a #6. So even if Childress ends up being average, I would say that it was a pretty good overall draft. Hansen, Ivey and Donta are all great picks for where they were picked. Diaw is debatable at this point of his career for a 28th pick. Overall I would say BK has drafted well. Not great, not horrible, but well. Childress is definitely his worst pick to date, and he still holds a ton of potential. All of these picks would look better if they were on a good team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now