Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Diesel talks about the Hawks... vol 1.


Diesel

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

first size: smoove is the same size as kmart/amare/toine/al/brand/kemp/etc

at least on DEFENSE, smoove is a pf

he is not a good perimeter defender

furthermore, if he guards the sf, then when he comes in to get the weakside block, he leaves his man on the perimeter wide open

did u not watch last season?

if he guards the pf (or whichever forward plays in the paint the most), then he can get blocks without leaving his man wide open...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he didn't foul out guarding kg last year

his pf opps only had a per of 15 when he guarded them, vs sfs having a per of 20.4 when he guarded them...

he also had 2.1 higher per as pf than sf

his points went up (3.5), his blocks went up, his rebounds went way up (5!)...

he also held his pf opps to over .1 less efg than his sf opps! that is HUGE .434 vs .537!

and before u say he didn't play enough pf, well that's true, but he also played over half as much pf as sg, which everyone seems to think he played a lot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Walter

Smoove might be able to play Pf but the position where he can be a star is Sf.

That's what I hate about this "versatility" only team. Because we can play everyone out of their primary position and because they all play similar positions we must play them out of position. A potentially great Sf (i.e. Marion) played at Pf is just a GD sorry Pf. Ugh!

W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would really like to have Knight on our team. He is a great point gaurd. Only his size is a problem, but when you have 10 SF that are 6'8 and above I dont think his size would be an obstacle. Even in the long run if his size is a problem I think he would still be a solid stop gap measure.We shoould have gotten Deron in the Draft. Stupid BK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Walter

WTF does that mean? Does that mean Josh Smith is more apt to be a star Pf than Sf? Is he likely to become a bigger star at Pf than Sf? If that is what you mean, then hell no!

The great 6'9" 225 Lb Pfs are few and far between (if ever again in this era). The top Pfs by TENDEX ranking are in order:

1) Garnett

2) Nowitzki

3) Stoudamire

4) Duncan

5) Brand

6) Webber

7) Odom

8) Gasol

9) Boozer

10) Bosh

Not ONE single one of these top 10 Pfs are 6'9" or shorter and 225 Lbs or less (Josh Smith's height and weight). Brand is 6'8" but has a HUGE wingspan and wieghs 50 lbs more than Josh Smith. Boozer is listed at the same height but again is 50 lbs heavier (and isn't my idea of a "star" Pf). Odom has an entirely different game as a point forward. Everybody else is taller and bigger. Bosh is and has a greater wingspan difference as well.

My point? Not one of the top ten Pfs currently resemble Josh Smith physically. The guy can physically dominate the Sf competition but the reverse is true at Pf. Why try and force him in the "star" Pf puzzle when he doesn't fit?!?

The ONLY reason I can see is because you acknowledge our glut at "forward". Fine. If you want to take the position that we get our best players on the court no matter what position, go ahead. Just don't try and sell me on Josh Smith is better suited for Pf than Sf. If we play him at Pf because of our logjam we had better accept we will be hindering his ability to reach a positionaly lower ceiling.

W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to disagree. I think Smoove's game is much better suited to the 4..First, he is no longer 225, I read a piece that said he was up to 235, and it was obvious that he was much more muscular from all the summer league games I watched..He has a frame that can continue to add mass..Second, Smoove is far and away our best shotblocker..At the 3 he has to leave his man to come on help defense around the basket, playing the 4 he is closer in and does not leave guys wide open on the perimeter..Third, Smoove is a shakey ballhandler..He has small hands for his size and simply does not have good handles..A good 3 needs to be able to drive to the hoop without dribbling the ball off his foot. Fourth, Smoove has quick hops alot like Rodman had..He just gets off the ground quicker than 95 percent of guys in the league..Playing a more inside position will allow him to use those hops to become a solid rebounder..I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him average between 8 and 10 rebounds a game playing the 4..I just don't think Smoove will ever have the handles or the consistant outside shot to be a dominant 3, but his natural skills and size could very well make him a Shawn Kemp-like 4..Kemp is the player Smoove reminds me of the most...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Walter

Smoove is more likley to get a handle than post moves in the next 3 years. The guy is a slasher, don't make him a spot up shooter (Sg) or make him back down defenders (Pf).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...