Guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 It's a real eye opener that KG was 5-19 and we still lost.JT was most responable for the loss. Not only his shooting,but he let a crackhead like Troy Hudson school him.Not to mention he done a less than steller job at the point tonight. His defense was horrible....the lead was cut to 7 and he stood there and watched as Troy Hudson blew by him for a easy layup.Not to mention JT missed several important shots and he hasn't be clutch at all this year and really hasn't had a good start despite what the stats say.JT obviousally doesn't have the winning desire he has claimed or he wouldn't have allowed that easy layup to happen. That was disgusting.Minnesota came off a back to back and right now has a team that lacks talent with both Wally and Brandon not playing,however they came in a played a Hawks team that have no fire. Right now I'd offer JT 5 million at the most.He doesn't deserve more than that right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted November 21, 2002 Premium Member Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Well you gotta offer JT more than the Middle Class E. I would give him 6 million to start on a 7 yr deal with team options in the 3rd and 5th yr. How did SAR matchup against KG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 KG can have terrible games and still find ways to make impact.He draws so much attention. All JT is worth at the current time is the middle class.His shot has been aweful and inaccurate. Big Dog and Shareef both had bloated stats in the game and neither we able to effect the out come.Big Dog had a nice 4th period when the game was near out of reach.But were was he before the game became a blow out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaywalker72 Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 This is pathetic the guy has a bad game and people want his head...no one says shitz when he is knocking down jumpers and keepin us in games....everybody has bad games...Kobe >.KG...everybody. The TEAM didn't come out with any energy thats why they got down by 25 ...that was not JTs fault....it is not JTs fault that when we cut it to 11 and had the MO Kruger started the 4th with one starter on the floor...that was not JTs fault. U so called fans can't live and die with game 11 ....it is a long season. Email and Newble should never be on the floor together period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin chillzatl Posted November 21, 2002 Admin Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 The loss was lons fault, not JT's. ARR just likes to whine and point fingers. To this point it's been shareef and big dog. But since they had the good games last night, he has to point his finger at JT. pathetic aint it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 He had a bad game,but allow Troy Hudson to blow by you for a easy layup in the manner he did was sickening.Lets face it,to you guys we have a bunch of superstars that can do no wrong.The players are a god in your eyes.Your just like those [censored] Braves fans who full the"everything is ok"crap.Get over it!You know that was horrible.Quit being stupid fans you know he allowed that guy to blow right by him on defense.That was terrible. Bit I forgot,the players are a god according to you guys.Don't say anything bad about them are you are crying.They are so great.That's why our record is so good.[censored] it's better than before right?That's all that matters? Your never going to get it. Btw,Big Dog got toasted on defense and pushed around by a scrub like Gary Trent on defense.And Shareef was not a factor in the 4th period as always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin chillzatl Posted November 21, 2002 Admin Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 haha, you are a funny guy. Who cares if someone says something bad about them? There is a big difference in complaining about a loss and the crying you do. You whine and cry about every little thing and never bother to recognize the good. Big dog puts up 33 and almost pulls us back into the game. To most people that was good. To you it's inflated stats that were made when the game meant nothing. That's chumpish. Most people would try to be educated about their negativity. But you don't even bother. Shareef was a "non factor" in the 4th, even though they didn't throw him the ball at all because big dog was hot. But that's all Reefs fault, he just sucks. keep your eye out for teh waaaahmbulance, it's on its way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Who cares if someone says something bad about them? There is a big difference in complaining about a loss and the crying you do. You whine and cry about every little thing and never bother to recognize the good. Big dog puts up 33 and almost pulls us back into the game. To most people that was good. To you it's inflated stats that were made when the game meant nothing. That's chumpish. " Big Dog score....his man scores......Big Hog scores....His man Scores... We also did this.....we almost did that....but what didn't come back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 First of all, Big Dog guarded KG for most of the game. Reef was on Trent. Big Dog played a [censored] of a game and if Lon hadn't sat him at the beginning of the 4th, he might have brought us all the way back. Second, Reef scores 23 points on 8-13 shooting, grabs 11 boards and dishes out 6 assists while being guarded by one of the best one on one defenders in the NBA for most of the game and you STILL criticize him? You don't know anything about basketball. Third, yes JT had a tough game but one bad game doesn't make him a bad player. Besides, if he has 17 pts, 8 assists and 0 turnovers in his bad games, I'll take that all day. You can call Troy Hudson a scrub all you want be he can score. He was actually leading the Wolves in scoring until Wally Z can back and he's still averaging almost 16 ppg despite being the 3rd option. JT didn't play well on defense last night and he didn't shoot well but I'll guarantee you that he will have a lot more good games than bad. Your whining, crying and badmouthing is sad. Does it make you feel better to sit back and spout all this negative BS about people who don't give a [censored] about you because they don't even know you exist? How pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 I turned the game off when the lead got up to like 17 and didn't turn it back on til the 4th period. "Second, Reef scores 23 points on 8-13 shooting, grabs 11 boards and dishes out 6 assists while being guarded by one of the best one on one defenders in the NBA for most of the game and you STILL criticize him? You don't know anything about basketball." he was not a factor when he was needed the most.You don't seem to understand the difference.How is it so f***in hard to understand the difference?The law of averages says the game will be close more often than not.So you need guys that are willing to step up when really needed and Shareef NEVER does that.Vancouver fans knew it and your too stupid to know the difference. "Besides, if he has 17 pts, 8 assists and 0 turnovers in his bad games" It's not hard to have 17 points when you shoot 21 times...ask Walker.1-9 in three's?He done a poor a** job of managing the game. There was a couple of times when Big Dog was matched up on Gary Trent and Trent just pushed Big Hog right out of the way. "You can call Troy Hudson a scrub all you want be he can score. He was actually leading the Wolves in scoring until Wally Z can back and he's still averaging almost 16 ppg despite being the 3rd option." There is no excuse for allowing the crackhead to get easy layups. Simply put he is not worth the contract he is asking for... what is he shooting for the year??35%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pathway23 Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Actually Hotlanta Dude, JT's efficiency was alright - 17 points on 17 shot attempts. He did not attempt 21 shots. While JT's shot selection was poor - Kruger called the plays that got him his shots, which were mostly good looks that he hits. This loss was totally Kruger's fault. It had nothing to do with the players. The blame for this loss lies squarely on Kruger's no-brain rotations and playcalling. He put the 2nd unit in all at the same time, he did not leave one of the big 3 scorers on the floor for his substitutions in the 2nd and 4th which cost us the game. As soon as the Wolves made it a 10 point deficit, Reef should have been put into the game and Lon should have made calls for Reef to post up and score right in the teeth of that zone, or draw fouls. Instead, Lon waited until the lead got to 20. And on from there....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 While coaching was alot of the problem the excuses are growing old..."We could have won....but" 1-9 in three's is not good because he shouldn't be taking that many 3's in the first place. His shooting is almost forgiveable.....but that that easy layup is not.If a player is willing to give that up in the that position he doesn't want to win badly enough.JT has a big problem with fundamentals and playing defense on key plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Almost all those threes were wide open threes...threes he hits 5 out of 6 nights... if the shot is there and u are down by double digits u have to take it especially against a zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 He HAS to take the shot when he's open from deep, particularly when we're down by 20+ points. His shot was just off last night. He even missed 3 free throws out of 9 and that NEVER happens. Even though he was off, JT HAD to keep shooting because we were WAY down and he is our best 3 point shooter by far. What was he supposed to do, pass up the open shot and kick it around to Ira? Besides, he probably took 5 of those 9 3's in the late 3rd and 4th quarters. JT had a bad game. It happens. I'm sure that he will come back strong and I'm sure he will be a big reason that we win on a lot of nights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 You said: "he was not a factor when he was needed the most.You don't seem to understand the difference.How is it so f***in hard to understand the difference?The law of averages says the game will be close more often than not.So you need guys that are willing to step up when really needed and Shareef NEVER does that.Vancouver fans knew it and your too stupid to know the difference" When was he needed most last night and what did he fail to do that makes him the blame for the loss? Is it his fault that he did EXACTLY what he was supposed to do by catching the ball in the post and kicking it out to the open shooters? He didn't miss all those open 3's, JT, Big Dog and Dion did. [censored], if JT and Dion could have made shots, Reef would have had a triple double. It's funny how Reef had a better game than KG and yet he gets blamed for the loss. KG's supporting cast stepped up to help him by knocking down shots and Reef's didn't. That's a big reason that we lost the game. You say JT did a poor job of managing the game and yet he had 8 assists and ZERO turnovers. His management of the game was not the problem, his inability to knock down a wide open 3 was. He also had a bad defensive game. It happens. He'll be back and he'll be as good as ever. JT is worth every penny that Mike Bibby is worth. He may not be a max player but he's worth a long term, big time deal. Good thing the only time you're a GM is on your PS2 or in a fantasy league. Since you think the Hawks are all so pitiful, I suggest that you stop watching them and go back to your fantasy world on the PS2 where everything is wonderful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHawkDown Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 You are all arguing about nothing. Give it a while. I dont lose sleep when the Hawks lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nurlman Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Amen, brother. Calm down. And how JT's 1-9 and a 15% shooting second quarter are Lon's fault, I have no idea. That's a big, long stretch. The team had a bad game. Period. Move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 One bad game in and 82 game season is not the end of the world. I just get sick of ARR's whiny, crybaby nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inside_Man Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 The score in the 2nd quarter was 33 to 12 we lost - we won the other 3 quarters 81-70. Here's my idea. Sit Lon for the 2nd quarter. Let Gar or somebody else takeover for 12 minutes. This'll work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now