jerrywest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Quote: Quote: I don't see how you can reject Gasol based on playing no D and expect Yi to do any better. I don't but i do expect Yi to be faster, a better permimeter shooter and over $10 million cheaper. Not to mention we don't have to trade assets to get him. I don't think it is out of the question that Yi will be able to defend the 3, but obviously only time will tell. Exactly. Yi+Chillz for half the money of Gasol. Gasol isn't a superstar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted June 12, 2007 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Those "chronic injuries" haven't kept him from playing either 82 or 79 games a season for 4 out of his last 6 seasons. He had one broken foot, a freak injury, and one season where he had a nagging foot injury. In between that was a healthy season, just like last year would have been healthy if he had not broken his foot. Nothing in your post pointed to a degenerative condition in his left foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beav Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Quote: Those "chronic injuries" haven't kept him from playing either 82 or 79 games a season for 4 out of his last 6 seasons. He had one broken foot, a freak injury, and one season where he had a nagging foot injury. In between that was a healthy season, just like last year would have been healthy if he had not broken his foot. Nothing in your post pointed to a degenerative condition in his left foot. Hey you say tomato I say tomato, some people look at the last 3 years some look at 4 out of 6. Some people see chronic foot problems some don't. My point is I would look at trading for the the guy still (without giving up the farm) but foot problems and back give me worry particularly when they've flared up 2 out of the last 3 years. The point is I am not a doctor (and I think may only one or two people here are) and these are boiling down to opinions. My purpose is not to say that you are wrong, but a reaction to your headline of debunking a myth. They are two differing opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now