Brotha2ThaNite Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I'm sorry guys, but it looks like I'm right. We need to trade Marvin for a big. Marvin is looking like he is only good for a good 17 footer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted February 20, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Quote: I'm sorry guys, but it looks like I'm right. We need to trade Marvin for a big. Marvin is looking like he is only good for a good 17 footer. After one half game with our new PG? Go to bed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotha2ThaNite Posted February 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Quote: Quote: I'm sorry guys, but it looks like I'm right. We need to trade Marvin for a big. Marvin is looking like he is only good for a good 17 footer. After one half game with our new PG? Go to bed. No it's after seeing Al in foul trouble again. Woody puts in Zaza and we get killed on the boards How does a man over 6'11" shoots under 40%??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Peoriabird Posted February 20, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Quote: I'm sorry guys, but it looks like I'm right. We need to trade Marvin for a big. Marvin is looking like he is only good for a good 17 footer. No we need to trade Joe Johnson for a big! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotha2ThaNite Posted February 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Quote: Quote: I'm sorry guys, but it looks like I'm right. We need to trade Marvin for a big. Marvin is looking like he is only good for a good 17 footer. No we need to trade Joe Johnson for a big! I just can't find out what is up with JJ. He is pissing me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlHorford Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Childress for Diop and a Rd.2 is something I would try to get done. Even without the Rd. 2 possibly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotha2ThaNite Posted February 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Quote: Childress for Diop and a Rd.2 is something I would try to get done. Even without the Rd. 2 possibly F that don't trade Chill. he is playing. Trade Marvin. He is doing nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlHorford Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Quote: Quote: Childress for Diop and a Rd.2 is something I would try to get done. Even without the Rd. 2 possibly F that don't trade Chill. he is playing. Trade Marvin. He is doing nothing. Well, here's the thing... Childress is probably gone next year anyway assuming that the team locks up Smith instead... so he's the more logical decision as a trade chip, even though he's currently playing better. Diop is off the books after this year too, but you can at least see if you can make a run with him manning the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now