ryandauwalker Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 We know that Denver is looking to unload Gallinari once they land him from New York. There are also many people that believe they will look to unload Felton as they've got they're guy in Lawson. Gallinari/Felton for Crawford/Teague/1st? That gives us: Felton/Bibby JJ/Mo Gallinari/Marvin Smith/Powell Horford/Zaza While we haven't gotten our C, I think we improve the SF and PG positions in a big way, and we get good value for Crawford. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted February 22, 2011 Admin Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 We know that Denver is looking to unload Gallinari once they land him from New York. There are also many people that believe they will look to unload Felton as they've got they're guy in Lawson. Gallinari/Felton for Crawford/Teague/1st? That gives us: Felton/Bibby JJ/Mo Gallinari/Marvin Smith/Powell Horford/Zaza While we haven't gotten our C, I think we improve the SF and PG positions in a big way, and we get good value for Crawford. Thoughts? Value wise that just does not work for Denver. Gallinari is in Denver's future plans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryandauwalker Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 Value wise that just does not work for Denver. Gallinari is in Denver's future plans http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=6146336 According to ESPN, they are probably going to look to trade Gallinari. I know it's ESPN, but that's why I put together this proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted February 22, 2011 Admin Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=6146336 According to ESPN, they are probably going to look to trade Gallinari. I know it's ESPN, but that's why I put together this proposal. If they are going to trade him it wouldn't be basiclly for Teague. He has high value even though his contract is not very big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryandauwalker Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 If they are going to trade him it wouldn't be basiclly for Teague. He has high value even though his contract is not very big. You don't think Teague being the backup PG, 10 million expiring, and a 1st round pick is enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superiorblogman Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 We would not do the suggested trade because we are then in LUXURY. On the other hand, Marvin, Teague, Jordan a 1st round pick in 2012 and a 2nd within 5 years should get it done. That could be too much that we send truthfully. http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6dhj77v Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now