Plainview1981 Posted October 3, 2003 Report Share Posted October 3, 2003 2001-2002 PPG:94PPG opp PPG:98.3PPG FG%43.9 Opp FG%:45.9 APG:20.2 Opp APG:22.6 RPG:41.5 Opp RPG:43 SPG:8.1 Opp:8.6 TO:15.6 Opp:15.1 This pasted year: PG:94.1PPG opp PPG:97.6PPG FG%44.4 Opp FG%:43.6 APG:20.5 Opp APG:21.6 RPG:42.6 Opp RPG:42.6 SPG:7.5 Opp:9.0 TO:16.7 Opp:13.0 The teams PPG had no difference really with Dog this year. However, the team rebounded alittle better, shot alittle higher percentage. But the Hawks had two extra turnovers and forced 3 TO's less per game than they did a year ago. The steals went down. Glen Robinson appeared to have made very little difference. Alot can be blamed on JT, but this shows we probably will not be worse overall than last year if Nailon and Jackson are signed. I think Jt slacked off defense more this year....Two years ago when he was moved to PG he actually forced alot of PG's to have bad shooting nights. But this year he and the rest of the team seem to have the approach that Theo would save them everytime. I hope that doesnt happen this year. Again, I think the stats showed that Dog really had no impact this year. That's why the Hawks only won 2 more games than they won a year ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted October 3, 2003 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2003 Just in case nobody caught my point, I was trying to say Dog made no difference good or bad. We scored the same way without Dog a year ago and were about the same on defense with and without him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now