SEC Football Historical Team Stats (Wins, bowls, etc.)

[coachx]

Win %Bama: (827-321-43)--0.712Tenn: (799-354-53)--0.684LSU: (743-393-47)--0.648UGA: (759-402-54)--0.647UF: (680-387-40)--0.632AU: (713-414-47)--0.627TAMU: (692-452-48)--0.601Ark: (684-460-40)--0.595Miss: (628-492-35)--0.559Mizzou: (632-530-52)--0.542SoCar: (565-545-44)--0.509UK: (580-582-44)--0.499Vandy: (573-578-50)--0.498Miss St: (514-549-39)--0.484Win % vs BCSBama: (455-217-23)--0.67122Tenn: (408-236-24)--0.62874UGA: (423-271-20)--0.60644LSU: (456-295-34)--0.60255UF: (384-280-21)--0.57591AU: (362-284-22)--0.55838Ark: (377-347-22)--0.52011TAMU: (390-370-31)--0.51264Mizzou: (361-386-32)--0.48395Miss: (288-310-17)--0.48211SoCar: (173-250-7)--0.41047Miss: (198-377-15)--0.34831UK: (206-410-15)--0.33835Vandy: (175-442-26)--0.29238Win % vs SECBama: (373-168-20)--0.68271Tenn: (323-185-19)--0.63093UGA: (308-202-14)--0.60115UF: (300-208-15)--0.58795LSU: (300-211-22)--0.58349AU: (294-234-18)--0.55495Mizzou: (17-14-1)--0.54688Miss: (247-261-15)--0.48662Ark: (102-123-4)--0.45415TAMU: (31-39-1)--0.44366SoCar: (90-153-5)--0.37298Miss St: (172-342-12)--0.33840UK: (156-351-12)--0.31214Vandy: (127-383-18)--0.25758Bowl Games:Bama: 60Tenn: 49UGA: 48LSU: 44UF: 40Ark: 39AU: 37Miss: 34TAMU: 34Mizzou: 29SoCar: 18Miss St: 16UK: 15Vandy: 6Bowl Wins:Bama: 35UGA: 27Tenn: 25AU: 22LSU: 22Miss: 22UF: 20TAMU: 15Ark: 13Mizzou: 13Miss St: 9UK: 8SoCar: 6Vandy: 3National Championships (I know this is up for debate for every team)Bama: 14Tenn: 4LSU: 4UF: 3AU: 2UGA: 2Miss: 2TAMU: 2Ark: 1SEC Titles:Bama: 23Tenn: 13UGA: 12LSU: 11UF: 8AU: 7Miss: 6UK: 2Miss St: 1Top 10 Finishes:Bama: 31Tenn: 24LSU: 23UGA: 21AU: 18UF: 17Ark: 15TAMU: 12Miss: 10Mizzou: 7SoCar: 2UK: 2Miss St: 110+ Win Seasons:Bama: 32UGA: 20Tenn: 20UF: 13LSU: 13AU: 12Ark: 12TAMU: 12Miss: 6Mizzou: 5SoCar: 3UK: 2Miss St: 2Heisman Trophy Winners:UF: 3AU: 3UGA: 2TAMU: 2Bama: 1LSU: 1SoCar: 1

[AHF]

It is also a little unfair to even talk about that since they play South Carolina every year and they are clearly a bottom tier SEC team until recently. http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/acc/clemson/vs_conf_opponents.php?confid=177&start=1970&end=2012

And for some ACC "bragging", the SEC does not have a winning record against Duke, Maryland, and UNC. Strange, huh?

http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/sec/vs_conf_byteam.php?confid=11

Not really. Duke, Maryland, and UNC got their winning records against South Carolina in every case. They would all have had losing records but for the fact that they played South Carolina so much more than other SEC and all had great records.

The theme for all those records is Duke (almost 50% of SEC matchups), Maryland (>33% of SEC matchups) and North Carolina (>40% of SEC matchups) enjoyed beating up on one of the SEC's historic weak sisters of the poor in South Carolina.