frankthetank966 Posted May 30, 2013 Report Share Posted May 30, 2013 The fact that fans are talking about dealing Lou is said. He's under contract for a few more years and took less money to return to Atlanta. He wants to be here. Unlike other stars players like Howard and Smith. His contract is market value. Why would we deal a piece like a sixth man? Doesn't make any sense. Lou is one of the few things this team has going on right now. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators lethalweapon3 Posted May 30, 2013 Moderators Report Share Posted May 30, 2013 "why would we ever want to get rid of a sixth man?" "I know, right?" ~jamal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachx Posted May 30, 2013 Report Share Posted May 30, 2013 "why would we ever want to get rid of a sixth man?" "I know, right?" ~jamalLou makes half the money we were paying Crawford and is 5 years younger Resigning Crawford would have put us in the luxury tax. Not resinging a player and trading a player are different. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators lethalweapon3 Posted May 30, 2013 Moderators Report Share Posted May 30, 2013 Lou makes half the money we were paying Crawford and is 5 years younger Resigning Crawford would have put us in the luxury tax. Not resinging a player and trading a player are different. Proof that while "sixth men of the year don't grow on trees", as said earlier, there's always a reason to consider some pruning. ~lw3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now