Moderators AHF Posted June 15, 2016 Moderators Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 This is the selection for each team that would earn them an "A" from him: Get all of ESPN's draft coverage from Chad Ford and more experts here. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Posted June 20, 2016 Report Share Posted June 20, 2016 If Hield got past Minnesota they get an automatic "F." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flight Posted June 20, 2016 Report Share Posted June 20, 2016 Am I wrong for NOT wanting Bembry? lol I'd GLADLY take Malik, be happy with diallo or Valentine over him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2016 Report Share Posted June 21, 2016 6 hours ago, Flight said: Am I wrong for NOT wanting Bembry? lol I'd GLADLY take Malik, be happy with diallo or Valentine over him. I don't want Bembry either. He plays a pretty fundamental game but something is missing. He doesn't have the "it" factor for me. I'd really love to take a shot at Denzel Valentine or Ulis despite all the injury talk. These guys aren't big men and with modern medicine today, I doubt their injuries are that big of a deal. Plus, they have heart. Let's please draft somebody with work ethic and heart for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted June 21, 2016 Admin Report Share Posted June 21, 2016 Every time I look at the draft order I hate Brooklyn that much more 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted June 21, 2016 Author Moderators Report Share Posted June 21, 2016 6 hours ago, capstone21 said: Every time I look at the draft order I hate Brooklyn that much more So agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachx Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 It would be a mistake to pass on Beasley for Bembry, IMHO. He has more upside than Valentin or Bembry. I know Beasley is a SG and they are more SFs but I'd swing for the upside. Especially when the upside guy was also super productive against really good ACC competition as a true freshman. That being said..............I would not be mad at taking Valetin or Bembry. I personally don't see Bembry fitting because he can't catch and shoot and we demand that ability out of the wing position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted June 22, 2016 Moderators Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 14 minutes ago, coachx said: It would be a mistake to pass on Beasley for Bembry, IMHO. He has more upside than Valentin or Bembry. I know Beasley is a SG and they are more SFs but I'd swing for the upside. Especially when the upside guy was also super productive against really good ACC competition as a true freshman. That being said..............I would not be mad at taking Valetin or Bembry. I personally don't see Bembry fitting because he can't catch and shoot and we demand that ability out of the wing position. I don't know anything about these guys but I'll take the wing that can shoot. Seems like Bembry is horrible from 3 and horrible at FTs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachx Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 (edited) Wow ! Am I blind ? I don't see Taurean Prince listed any where in Ford's 1st round. He would be a solid pickup if he is still on the board at #21. He is like a bigger version of D. Carroll. Edited June 22, 2016 by coachx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 22, 2016 Report Share Posted June 22, 2016 That's the #1 guy I said that I DONT want us to take, Bembry (in NBA draft thread). He reminds me of Childress, I know a lot of people liked Childress but I didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now