Is this wrong to do or unethical?

[Wurider05]

Curry is a risk we should be willing to take but we should have a clause in his contract that if he drops dead from a heart problem we don't owe his family one dime and that his contract becomes void. He and his agents should run some of the same risks that the team who pays him run. It not fair to us or the Bulls to give him a near max contract then he can't play anymore or god forbids passes away. Everyone should share the risk. Now if he wants the big money this would be the way to go.

[Yeti]

No, it is just smart. You write it so that he gets paid only for games while he is on the active roster. Must also specify that HE takes full responsibility and that the Hawks are not liable for death associated with his heart condition. Then add an insurance policy to cover his family just in case.

Rather morbid isn't it.

[Wurider05]

Could it be done within the guidelines of a standard NBA contract or would the player's union not allow it since it could open the door for other things such has criminal behavior,arrests,etc.?

[AHF]

I seriously doubt that contract would comply with the CBA. It violates the guaranteed nature of player contracts in the NBA.

[Gray Mule]

Makes too much sense.

Therefore, I'm sure this MUST be forbidden.

[Traceman]

contract he signs. I think the Bulls have already made him an incentive-laden offer that protects them if he is unable to perform for health reasons.