With a growing number of once-super NBA stars losing out in free agency musical chairs in the limelight of their careers, I wonder would it be beneficial for the NBA to create a traveling franchise with no geographical base. Only players with 10+ seasons that are unsigned through August 31 of each year are eligible for max 2-year contracts. Think of "The D-League Select Team," but with sun-setting NBA players that would play two games against each NBA team during the season. Corporate sponsors can set up and run the franchise and arrange naming rights ("BC Aflac" or something). I want to say they do stuff like this in pro soccer, but can't think of a specific example.
If they outperform the league's worst playoff entrant, they get a play-in road game at the end of the regular season. After winning that, they would play their home playoff contests in the perennial NBA exhibition towns (Vegas, KC, etc.)
If it's done right, I think it would add a draw to each NBA arena that small-market and non-contending teams don't provide on a 40+game home schedule.
~lw3