BusBoyIsBack Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 I finally figured out why Brandan Wright went from clear cut #2 player in the draft to not even worthy of kissing the feet of Kevin Durant. The scouts weren't off when they originally assessed Wright, there are two major reasons why Durant had a better year. The second is a byproduct of the first. The main reason is the talent around them. At North Carolina, Brandan Wright was playing with a team filled of All-Americans from the starting lineup to the bench. So he wasn't asked to do as much. He split tons of opportunities to score and rebound with Tyler Hansborough. So that had a big impact on his numbers. But even still Wright managed to have a solid season. In 37 games he averaged 14.7 PPG, 6.2 RPG, 1 APG, 1 SPG, and 1.8 BPG Just sound like decent numbers right? But the number that caught my eye that made me come to this big idea was his FG% His FG% was a whopping 64.6 %! His biggest weakness, FT% was 56.7% So I said how in the world could he be that efficient at scoring and only manage to score under 15 PPG Well here's why Brandan Wright attempted 9.54 field goals per game in his 27 MPG Kevin Durant by comparison took a whopping 18.4 field goals per game in his 36 MPG. So almost twice as many shots per game in nearly 10 more MPG of PT. Well shoot no wonder he had better numbers. Now it makes a helluva lot more sense. Of course Wright couldn't touch Durant's season considering he had 10 less minutes per game and half as many shots. On the amount of shots Wright took per game, he wouldn't match Durant's scoring total if he shot 100% from the field! Meanwhile if Wright took as many shots per game as Durant he would have easily matched his offensive productivity. Of course there is assuming that Wright's FG% wouldn't drop dramatically but still the FGAs explain a whole lot. Now Im not saying Brandan Wright is still a better prospect than Kevin Durant. But maybe just maybe, Durant didn't go from behind Wright to 10 times better like some are insinuating. After all, Wright had the higher efficiency rating and as they say, the numbers don't lie. Because of the lack of talent around Durant's team, guess what he had TWICE the amount of opportunity. Because his team wasn't as talented, they shouldered the load on him. And check out these numbers I found on him: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 WTF are you talking about? Durant was the RUNAWAY CPOY as a freshman. Wright was simply good but not remotely great. Wright can't shoot a jumper or from the ft line and he is undersized for his position. In contrast Durant is one of the best perimeter shooters i have ever seen as a freshman and he is very tall for a 3. Wright had a high fg percentage in large part because many of his attempts were dunks created by other players. Ridiculous thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted May 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: WTF are you talking about? Durant was the RUNAWAY CPOY as a freshman. Wright was simply good but not remotely great. Wright can't shoot a jumper or from the ft line and he is undersized for his position. In contrast Durant is one of the best perimeter shooters i have ever seen as a freshman and he is very tall for a 3. Wright had a high fg percentage in large part because many of his attempts were dunks created by other players. Ridiculous thread. He took nearly 20 shots per game! And he barely missed 4 minutes of playing time per game, Are you going to deny that is overwhelmingly more opportunities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vafan Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 I agree. Wright is over rated. Lawson was the engine that made that team go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted May 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: I agree. Wright is over rated. Lawson was the engine that made that team go. Ty Lawson running 300 miles per hour means jack without the finishing ability of Wright You ask anyone who the MVP of that team was and they sure as hell aren't going to say Ty Lawson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: Quote: WTF are you talking about? Durant was the RUNAWAY CPOY as a freshman. Wright was simply good but not remotely great. Wright can't shoot a jumper or from the ft line and he is undersized for his position. In contrast Durant is one of the best perimeter shooters i have ever seen as a freshman and he is very tall for a 3. Wright had a high fg percentage in large part because many of his attempts were dunks created by other players. Ridiculous thread. He took nearly 20 shots per game! And he barely missed 4 minutes of playing time per game, Are you going to deny that is overwhelmingly more opportunities? And he created those opportunities himself. He was scoring off the dribble most of the time. He wasn't being spoon fed dunks like Wright. If Wright actually had to create for himself he wouldn't be able to do crap because defenders don't have to honor his game outside and he isn't big enough to back people down. By your logic the only thing that makes Kobe better than Marvin is that he takes more shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncthompson11 Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Many guys would average as much as durant if they had the same amount of shots as him. Wright has basically no offensive game except for a little jump hook with his left hand. Him and durant shouldnt even be in the same category when you put in durants 3 point shooting and ball handling. Comparing those 2 is pretty foolish. Also wright was not doubled team on carolinas team, it was hansbrough being doubled and teams trying to contain lawson. He made mostly junk baskets except for a good inside move here and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncthompson11 Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 "You ask anyone who the MVP of that team was and they sure as hell aren't going to say Ty Lawson. " your right it would be tyler hansbrough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted May 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: And he created those opportunities himself. He was scoring off the dribble most of the time. He wasn't being spoon fed dunks like Wright. If Wright actually had to create for himself he wouldn't be able to do crap because defenders don't have to honor his game outside and he isn't big enough to back people down. By your logic the only thing that makes Kobe better than Marvin is that he takes more shots. No the difference is that he was given those opportunities more because the ball was in his hands more. It was a lot harder for Wright on that stacked team to get the basketball. Hell a 1/4 of his points had to come from offensive rebounding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vafan Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Huh? It was Lawson who created easy opportunities for Wright. I would pick Yi over Wright and Conley over Wright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBoy Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Everything about this smells like Marvin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted May 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: Huh? It was Lawson who created easy opportunities for Wright. I would pick Yi over Wright and Conley over Wright. So you think it was easier for Wright to get the ball on a team without a defined go to guy than a team where a guy had the ball in his hands practically every possession and was in the game for practically the whole time? Come on now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted May 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: Everything about this smells like Marvin. Initially it seems familiar considering they are both North Carolina freshman forwards. But Marvin is a PURE SF. He will not be confused with a post player on any end of the floor. Wright lives in the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: Quote: Huh? It was Lawson who created easy opportunities for Wright. I would pick Yi over Wright and Conley over Wright. So you think it was easier for Wright to get the ball on a team without a defined go to guy than a team where a guy had the ball in his hands practically every possession and was in the game for practically the whole time? Come on now The reason Durant had the ball so much is because he was the best player in college basketball. Why does Lebron have the ball more than Gooden? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBoy Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 I was referring to all the excuses being used as to why Brandon Wright was not the man while he was at North Carolina. I swear to you it mimicks all the posts around here during the Marvin/CP3 wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncthompson11 Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 wrights biggest key this season was roy williams style of play. The uptempo game really helped wright so he could take a dribble and jam it on someone and get easy baskets. He rarely showed a face up game besides maybe doing a little fake and going for a dunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vafan Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 All I am saying is that Durant showed a lot more offensive reportaire than Wright. All Wright did was shoot layups and dunks. But anyways, I much prefer Yi over Wright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: Quote: Quote: WTF are you talking about? Durant was the RUNAWAY CPOY as a freshman. Wright was simply good but not remotely great. Wright can't shoot a jumper or from the ft line and he is undersized for his position. In contrast Durant is one of the best perimeter shooters i have ever seen as a freshman and he is very tall for a 3. Wright had a high fg percentage in large part because many of his attempts were dunks created by other players. Ridiculous thread. He took nearly 20 shots per game! And he barely missed 4 minutes of playing time per game, Are you going to deny that is overwhelmingly more opportunities? And he created those opportunities himself. He was scoring off the dribble most of the time. He wasn't being spoon fed dunks like Wright. If Wright actually had to create for himself he wouldn't be able to do crap because defenders don't have to honor his game outside and he isn't big enough to back people down. By your logic the only thing that makes Kobe better than Marvin is that he takes more shots. No, I don't think you understand what he saying, Wright wasn't far off from Durant was you think, he acutally is near him with alot less hype. Wright has more offensive game then the hook shot, that's just his bread and butter, you really need to watch him, he is just as important to that UNC team as Lawson, now Lawson was better but I think Lawson is one of the best college PG's in recent time, he can be alot better then even Kidd which is scary. Wright is the real deal, no joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 Quote: All I am saying is that Durant showed a lot more offensive reportaire than Wright. All Wright did was shoot layups and dunks. But anyways, I much prefer Yi over Wright. Wright moves weren't stopped that much at all, I couldn't remember a guy who stopped Wright, contain him, maybe but stopped him none. That what really stands out about him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBAreject Posted May 24, 2007 Report Share Posted May 24, 2007 You have gone from comparing Brandan Wright to "another Marvin Williams" to now Kevin Durant (just with fewer shots). This is absurd, and I LIKE WRIGHT! This whole "Wright had fewer shots" argument isn't totally stupid, but...for the most part...it really is stupid. Durant is a RARE talent who can create shots from anywhere on the floor. Wright is not that type of player. His FG% was so high because of his high percentage of catches and dunks. As I said last night (while you were still berating me for wanting Wright over Hibbert), that's still a good thing (takes hands, positioning, timing, etc.), but it's not the same as creating a shot on an isolation or even a double-team. Wright is good, but dear God he is not Durant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now