SuperSavvyNation Posted May 25, 2007 Report Share Posted May 25, 2007 1. Draft Conley at #3 and BPA at #11 2. Trade #3 and Zaza to Memphis for Gasol draft Law IV at #11 3. Trade #3 and Chillz to Portland for Jack/Aldridge draft BPA at #11 Of course options 2&3 require an interested trading partner but I think that both of these trades are reasonable and help both teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deester11 Posted May 25, 2007 Report Share Posted May 25, 2007 I like Conley, but not at #3. We're going to get blasted by every one and their mother if we don't take him at 3. Therefore, I think BK MUST acquire a PG in any trade and the best case scenario is the Portland deal. (I still don't think they care about reuniting Conley and Oden). We have so many options that most of the beneficial trade scenarios haven't even come into play yet. The workouts and love fest of players by other GM's will factor into anything we do. Our ace in the hole is the #11 pick. No one is mentioning it, but I'd rather move the #11 pick for a PG by moving Chill or (I hate to say - Marvin) and taking the BPA with #3. Problem is..... who is the BPA for the Hawks at #3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezmund Posted May 25, 2007 Report Share Posted May 25, 2007 I agree, use our other assets to get a PG. Be it Childress, #11, Marvin, Shelden, etc. The #3 HAS to go to the BPA. We are NOT a playoff team. We are not at a position to just FILL holes. We need TALENT period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted May 25, 2007 Report Share Posted May 25, 2007 I don't think #3 is an option. I highly doubt the Blazers are going to put Aldridge on the trading block when they have the potential of forming a very strong front line with Aldridge and Oden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted May 25, 2007 Moderators Report Share Posted May 25, 2007 Quote: I don't think #3 is an option. I highly doubt the Blazers are going to put Aldridge on the trading block when they have the potential of forming a very strong front line with Aldridge and Oden. It depends entirely on their view of Randolph. The guy is only 26 years old and averaged 23 and 10 last year so I don't think it is outside the realm of possibility they move Aldridge rather than him. That said, I wouldn't want Randolph because of his defensive liabilities and his mental status (or lack thereof). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now