Supporter Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Is choosing between these three players: Joe johnson Josh Smith(if we resign) Al horford Which 2 out of these three would you be willing to pay max for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattlanta Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Quote: Is choosing between these three players: Joe johnson Josh Smith(if we resign) Al horford Which 2 out of these three would you be willing to pay max for That's a tough one. I'd say Horford. Close behind is Joe Johnson. Not so close behind the two would be Josh Smith... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris18 Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Right now its Joe, Josh, and then Al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJHAWK Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 As long as Joe is healthy and still playing at the level he played after we got Bibby then you sign Joe and worry about everyone else later. Id say Joe followed by Horford. Remember even if we give Smoove close to the max he is still very young. So when the time comes to decide on Horford we can either trade him or Smoove. If Smoove gets a 5 year deal he will already be 3 years in to it when Al's deal comes up. Worry about it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Quote: As long as Joe is healthy and still playing at the level he played after we got Bibby then you sign Joe and worry about everyone else later. Id say Joe followed by Horford. Remember even if we give Smoove close to the max he is still very young. So when the time comes to decide on Horford we can either trade him or Smoove. If Smoove gets a 5 year deal he will already be 3 years in to it when Al's deal comes up. Worry about it then. Good analysis NJ - the problem with BK was that he wanted to set up a team and just watch for 5 years or so. The Celtics and the Lakers have proven that you can't do that. "Worry about it then" is a good mantra. Last year the Celtics had just lost out on the "big two" after tanking and Kobe wanted out of LA. Now (thanks to Ainge pulling a rabbit out of his hat - and $$$) the Celts are close to being in the finals after being worse than us. The Lakers are a serious hoot (IMO)...Kobe wanted out...then they got Gasol...one of the most skilled offensive inside players....basically for free...now they look like the team of the future (during Kobe's late prime)...heck, they got a 7 foot center coming back next year in Bynum. If they can keep the others together like Odom (now coming into his own) and the Euros...they are GOLDEN for the next three years...and keep Fish. Very possibly a three year dynasty if all stay together and the cap wizard can get his job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bumpyphish1 Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 I diagree with the basis of this thread. I think it is entirely possible to keep all three players together for some time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now