Which is better?

[frosgrim]

Since there have been a few trades bantied about lately that appear to have some merit, I thought it might be a good idea to put all the resulting line-ups into a single thread for debate. These are made off memmory and looking at today's threads, so we might need to tweak the trades that get the line-ups:

Redd added (Bibby + Marvin for Redd + Mason (did Z get moved in this one?):

Law/FA/FA

Redd/Childress

JJ/Mason/Chill

Smith/Andersen/Horf/Solo

Horf/Andersen/Solo

Still need to fill out roster with FAs

JO/Tinsley added (Bibby+Marvin+Z+Claxton for JO+Tinsley+#11):

Tinsley/Law/FA

JJ/#11 pick

Smith/#11

Horf/Smith/Solo

JO/Horf/Solo

Chill renounced to add salary

Billups added (Bibby+2010 1st round pick for Billups):

Billups/Law/FA

JJ/Chil

Marvin/Chil

Smith/Horf/Solo

Horf/Z/Solo

Each of those line-ups have some intrigue to them. For the Redd and Billups line-ups a second trade should be made to add a guy like Foster to round out the team.

Talk away

PS- appologies for messing up any of the proposed trades.

[TruJerz]

Id take Tinsley and JO over Redd and Billups. we get two good starters and a potential all defensive team player and all star in JO..plus Tinsley kind of plays like Bibby but passes better and shoots worst

[EazyRoc]

Quote:

---

Id take Tinsley and JO over Redd and Billups. we get two good starters and a potential all defensive team player and all star in JO..plus Tinsley kind of plays like Bibby but passes better and shoots worst

Michael Redd still plays at a high level. He also plays many more games than JO plays. I think JO is not going to get better as far as injuries are concerned. Who knows if he'll come back and play like he used to play ?

Atleast you know what you're getting with Michael Redd. Besides for a team that has perceived financial issues, why would we take on two very big contracts like JO's and JT's ?

[cowa]

In the JO/JT trade, Marvin was not part of it. It was just Bibby/Zaza/Speedy. Someone else suggested then trading Marvin for spare parts due to salary isues, which may or may not be there.

[Cwell]

I like the 1st one the most and the 3rd one the least.The 3rd is horrible.The 2nd one the only good we get is the 11th pick which we got from them last year so there is prolly no way they'd let us use their pick at the same spot 2 years in a row.O'Neil is just gonna replace Craig on the bench but with more money tied up and Tinsley??????UGHHHHHHHH NO

[AtLaS]

I'd go for the Redd trade easily. I wouldn't even make the JO trade.

[AnnArborHawk]

I'd take Bibby and Marvin for Redd all day. I think someone else then suggested a S&T of Chilldress for TJ Ford. We'd definitely have to try to bring some depth to the bench in free agency, but that's a solid line-up:

Ford

Redd

JJ

Smith

Horford

[Cwell]

Quote:

---

Law

Redd

JJ

Smith

Horford

even better

[ATLSmith]

Couldn't resist.

[cordele]

the third one is better. all trades to send bibby make no us worse unless ac can become a vet pg in summer leage. to trade for billups would give us the best backcourt in the leage with out kobe or manu.