thecampster Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Per the guys on Mayhem in the AM, the plan is a lineup of Hinrich Crawford JJ Smith Horford Bringing Marvin and Zaza first off the bench. Collins may start on big lineups. Change in personnel is they wish to run people out of the building (ie...Bibby couldn't). Anyone else hear anything else similar with Hinrich/Crawford starting together? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachx Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 (edited) Per the guys on Mayhem in the AM, the plan is a lineup of Hinrich Crawford JJ Smith Horford Bringing Marvin and Zaza first off the bench. Collins may start on big lineups. Change in personnel is they wish to run people out of the building (ie...Bibby couldn't). Anyone else hear anything else similar with Hinrich/Crawford starting together? That will be interesting to watch. Even is that lineup does not start that will be the lineup that finishes games. Hinrich's versility looks like it will allow the Hawks to change both defensive plilosophy (less help defense) and offensive philosophy ( more up tempo ). Though he is older then Sessions he is far more well rounded since he plays better defense and shoots better from the perimeter. Edited February 25, 2011 by coachx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WakaFlocka Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Interesting... All I can think about right now though is Jamal getting repetitively burned by Monta and/or Curry tonight... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gray Mule Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 :thumbsdownsmileyanim: Starting the worst defender left on the team with the new PG doesn't sound reasonable. Hawks may start the same PG as we did last game. Let the new guy come in off the bench for a game or two until he gets his bearings. Nothing wrong with that. I remember an old commercial. "Does she or doesn't she? Only her hairdresser knows for sure." (Talking about hair dye.) Whe will start? Only our head coach knows for sure - - And, he may not have decided yet. :conversation: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WakaFlocka Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 :thumbsdownsmileyanim: Starting the worst defender left on the team with the new PG doesn't sound reasonable. Hawks may start the same PG as we did last game. Let the new guy come in off the bench for a game or two until he gets his bearings. Nothing wrong with that. I remember an old commercial. "Does she or doesn't she? Only her hairdresser knows for sure." (Talking about hair dye.) Whe will start? Only our head coach knows for sure - - And, he may not have decided yet. :conversation: I'd be very surprised if Hinrich DIDN'T start tonight. Even with Teague starting against PHX last game, he still only played what... like 20 minutes. I wouldn't expect to see him (Teague) play more than ~14 minutes tonight, if that. Remember that we're playing Golden State tonight, so we need all the offense we can get (which is why that lineup makes some sense). Plus GS isn't a big team so we don't need to start Collins at C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotha2ThaNite Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Interesting... All I can think about right now though is Jamal getting repetitively burned by Monta and/or Curry tonight... C'mon now give them a chance. Not every team have 5 starters that are good defense players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 That doesn't make sense...we remove the weakness on defense at the PG spot only to have it at the SG spot? If you think Jamal is horrible guarding PG's he will get eaten alive by the SG's. Jamal needs to still come off the bench, the bench is already weak we need Jamal's scoring from the bench, the starting lineup is set offensively...defense was the problem. I say we start Teague (doesn't have to be a lot of minutes) until the end of the road trip to give Kirk a chance to get acclimated. Who finishes the game will depend on the situations we are in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyCASH Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 That doesn't make sense...we remove the weakness on defense at the PG spot only to have it at the SG spot? If you think Jamal is horrible guarding PG's he will get eaten alive by the SG's. Jamal needs to still come off the bench, the bench is already weak we need Jamal's scoring from the bench, the starting lineup is set offensively...defense was the problem. I say we start Teague (doesn't have to be a lot of minutes) until the end of the road trip to give Kirk a chance to get acclimated. Who finishes the game will depend on the situations we are in. this is what i want start teague and have hinrich and jamal come off the bench much more fire power off the bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawksFan87 Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 (edited) uhmmm heck no, if Teague couldn't get the starting job over Bibby even when he was not playing well, what makes you think he's gonna start over Hinrich who is 10 times the defensive player bibby was/is ?? Edited February 25, 2011 by jsmoovefan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brokentree Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Hinrich and Crawford have played together in the same lineup before so I don't see why they can't again. You could say this gives Teague the opportunity to be the primary PG backup and increase his minutes and Marvin should be able to provide minutes at sg, sf, and pf as needed. Jamal will have to play within the offense though. Can't have him taking volume shots like he would off the bench. We have 4 other very capable scorers so we need to keep the ball moving and get our easy baskets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudBall Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Im just worried that Jamal will get in his chucking mood and ruin the flow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWebb Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 I still think it's better to have Jamal coming of the bench. Where would the scoring come from in the second unit if he starts ?I guess Jeff Teague has a huge role to play if we wanna see the Hawks competitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudBall Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 I still think it's better to have Jamal coming of the bench. Where would the scoring come from in the second unit if he starts ? I guess Jeff Teague has a huge role to play if we wanna see the Hawks competitive. :help wanted3: :help wanted3: :help wanted3: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawksFan87 Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 I think I"m the only one who would be OK with that line up lol, they are going to end the game that way anywayz lol.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 It depends on the team you are playing whether that line-up will work. ....Example: If we are playing Miami/Boston....you can't have Jamal and Joe guarding Wade and Lebron/Ray and Pierce/...Marvin plays good positional defense on LBJ and Pierce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted February 25, 2011 Moderators Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 As long as you mix and match starters and reserves and don't do whole-sale changes of the lineup, I don't have a problem with our top offensive options being on the floor together. If you are going to play a dedicated "second unit" then you should have someone like Crawford who can create their own shot. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bawse Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Per the guys on Mayhem in the AM, the plan is a lineup of Hinrich Crawford JJ Smith Horford Bringing Marvin and Zaza first off the bench. Collins may start on big lineups. Change in personnel is they wish to run people out of the building (ie...Bibby couldn't). Anyone else hear anything else similar with Hinrich/Crawford starting together? PERFECT. Absolutely perfect. Go ahead and start Jamal and move JJ to the SF like i've said all along. This lineup is our absolute best, can't wait to see this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawksFan87 Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Teague will get the start again tonight unfortunately lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bawse Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 Teague will get the start again tonight unfortunately lol... This is official? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawksFan87 Posted February 25, 2011 Report Share Posted February 25, 2011 This is official? yeah the hawks pr guy posted it on twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now