Jump to content

Josh won't be traded. Here is why.


Brotha2ThaNite

Recommended Posts

First let me say... I wouldn’t mind if Danny was able to pull off a trade that brought Jennings and Larry Sanders (Larry a must!) but… It’s not going to happen because Josh have said how he hates that city.

Here is the reason why you don’t trade Josh.


Look at the NBA History. You don’t win with young teams. Just about every NBA championship team is full with vets. Trading Josh just to get draft picks will only set this team back 5 years, maybe even 10 years. If you are not an instant super star coming out of college as a young players you will have to earn your way in this league before even the refs to start giving you the foul calls.

This is the Hawks perfect cross road. It’s time to do what Boston did to get their ring…

We are in the perfect spot. We have talent and money. You don’t go back if you’re at this point to get younger.

You take away Josh… then try to add young talent??? That’s like if you’re at 50pts, take away 15pts just to try to add 20pts (i.e. maybe a good draft play/ high risk!) which will bring your total to 55pts. No! You keep that 50pts and add 15pts (i.e.Howard/vet) and another 15pts (i.e.Mayo/vet)

Now you are at 80pts. Lol


So, when you see Josh not traded after 3pm Thursday don’t get mad. Just look at it this way.Posted Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to convince anyone to change their mind. If you want Josh to be traded I doubt if you're not going to want to trade him because of what I just put up. if you don't like him...I doubt that you're going to like him because of what I put up.I'm pretty sure for every bad point you dislike about josh's game there are members on here who could put up the same count or more bad points about Jeff and Al. Every message board of teams have fans who have their players they like and dislike. I'm just saying this is the reason behind he won't get traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People could put up the same quantity of negative points about Horford or Teague, but that doesn't mean any of those points are valid.

Lmbo! And I'm sure the ones about Josh would be, right?I'm one of the rare people here who wants Al, Josh, Jeff, Zaza, Ivan and Kyle to stay a Hawk! Edited by Brotha2ThaNite
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmbo! And I'm sure the ones about Josh would be, right?I'm one of the rare people here who wants Al, Josh, Jeff, Zaza, Ivan and Kyle to stay a Hawk!

I'm not sure whether the hypothetical points made about Josh would be accurate :) My point is that counting the number of bullet points someone can list isn't a good way of showing a player to be good, bad, contract-worthy, whatever.

I want them all to stay Hawks, but I doubt Josh would resign at a contract commensurate with what he actually brings to the table. Those others are pretty good values!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First let me say... I wouldn’t mind if Danny was able to pull off a trade that brought Jennings and Larry Sanders (Larry a must!) but… It’s not going to happen because Josh have said how he hates that city.

Here is the reason why you don’t trade Josh.

Look at the NBA History. You don’t win with young teams. Just about every NBA championship team is full with vets. Trading Josh just to get draft picks will only set this team back 5 years, maybe even 10 years. If you are not an instant super star coming out of college as a young players you will have to earn your way in this league before even the refs to start giving you the foul calls.

This is the Hawks perfect cross road. It’s time to do what Boston did to get their ring…

We are in the perfect spot. We have talent and money. You don’t go back if you’re at this point to get younger.

You take away Josh… then try to add young talent??? That’s like if you’re at 50pts, take away 15pts just to try to add 20pts (i.e. maybe a good draft play/ high risk!) which will bring your total to 55pts. No! You keep that 50pts and add 15pts (i.e.Howard/vet) and another 15pts (i.e.Mayo/vet)

Now you are at 80pts. Lol

So, when you see Josh not traded after 3pm Thursday don’t get mad. Just look at it this way.Posted Image

Marion + Mayo + 1st round pick for Josh + Jenkins

- Marion effectively replaces Josh's rebounding

- Mayo effectively replaces Josh's scoring

- Give the minutes we're now giving Jenkins, back to Stevenson and Morrow

Add additional playing time for Zaza and Ivan . . . and Josh is not missed at all, except for some of his highlight dunks and blocks

Meanwhile, Jeff Teague would have almost total control of the offense, especially in transition, which would improve his value.

And Al Horford will get a chance to really prove if he can be the leader of the Hawks. He'd be the undisputed leader of the team.

With that trade, you just added a vet who can still play in Marion, and will be a more accepting role player than Josh. Mayo gives you a potential 1st option ( who is really a #2 option ) type scorer. Both have talent. Both were lottery picks. Both are solid starters who can start or be the 6th man on just about any team.

And we'd still have enough room to make a run at a significant free agent. Maybe Al Jefferson

2013 - 14 Hawks

PG - Teague

G - Mayo

F - Marion

PF - Horford

C - Jefferson

It may not be enough to get us to EC Finals level just yet, but it is a step in the right direction.

The only way the Hawks could do like Boston did, would be to trade both Smith and Horford, and try to bring a significant star player in a bad situation to Atlanta. Both Garnett and Allen were in extremely bad team situations when they got traded.

Don't be a fool Ferry. Call up Cuban and bring those two to ATL.

Edited by northcyde
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure whether the hypothetical points made about Josh would be accurate Posted Image My point is that counting the number of bullet points someone can list isn't a good way of showing a player to be good, bad, contract-worthy, whatever.

I want them all to stay Hawks, but I doubt Josh would resign at a contract commensurate with what he actually brings to the table. Those others are pretty good values!

And THAT is what those of us who want to trade Josh have an issue with and why we are open to trading him. If he would sign for the 12 million flat that Horford is making I think that the majority of us here would welcome him back, but not for 3-6 million more per season when he refuses to stop doing the things that he shouldn't do. You can't say that about Al or Teague as they don't repeatedly do what everyone and their mama knows they shouldn't be doing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh I thought I hated that Mavs trade before, now you want us to give up our prized younger shooter too? What makes it even worse is that we could sign Mayo in the off-season if we want to.

BTW Marion didn't look so good the other night against Atlanta like you said he would. I think he shot 3/10 or something and Josh ended up dominating that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh I thought I hated that Mavs trade before, now you want us to give up our prized younger shooter too? What makes it even worse is that we could sign Mayo in the off-season if we want to.

BTW Marion didn't look so good the other night against Atlanta like you said he would. I think he shot 3/10 or something and Josh ended up dominating that game.

I'm thinking about now AND the future. Both of those guys would help us NOW. If both Mayo and Marion like it in Atlanta, they will stay. And while we could sign Mayo during the summer, it would give us an advantage if Mayo already knew how he felt about playing with the team, and competing in the playoffs again.

Marion no doubt had a bad game last week vs the Hawks. Still doesn't take away from his body of work as a role playing starter who can defend and rebound.

Both guys fit the "run and gun" style of play that some of you seem to like these days.

Hate the deal if you want, but that would be a WINNING deal for the Hawks. And it also gives Zaza and Ivan more playing time. Guys who simply play their role and don't mind mixing it up with people.

As for Jenkins, I like Jenkins. But he's no OJ Mayo. Not even close. OJ was the #3 pick in what can now be considered as a very good top heavy draft that included Rose, Westbrook, Brook Lopez, Love, Gallanari, Batum, Hibbert, Pekovic, Ibaka, McGee, and Deandre Jordan.

Mayo can ball, and he'd make you forget about Jenkins the more you watched him.

Edited by northcyde
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but you're in the overwhelming minority that thinks that's a winning trade or that Marion is still a good player. And sorry but I'm not losing Jenkins for the hope that Mayo would re-sign with us next year. If we really want him, we'll have as much chance as anyone to sign him next year as he could compete with Jenkins for the starting spot and we'd be able to give him a good contract above the MLE.

BTW the Mavericks already owe the Rockets their 1st round pick this year, unless it's in the top 20 and if it's top 20 they won't be able to trade it away to anyone. At best we could get their 2016 (or 1st available in coming years) pick right now and that's way too far down the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if we do nothing can't Josh just tell his agent to make the best deal he can with L.A. and go out West and play with D12 next year?

I think he'd be able to get the MLE and that's it. And that's assuming that teams over the luxury tax still get the MLE, which I'm not sure is even possible.

And DJ you know you're dying to see him traded to Boston so that you could cheer on your favorite player playing on your favorite team! Posted Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he'd be able to get the MLE and that's it. And that's assuming that teams over the luxury tax still get the MLE, which I'm not sure is even possible.

And DJ you know you're dying to see him traded to Boston so that you could cheer on your favorite player playing on your favorite team! Posted Image

Haha! Naw..I lost interest in the Celtics a good while ago.

I would be interested in seeing how much Smoove could impact a contending team though...like San Antonio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but you're in the overwhelming minority that thinks that's a winning trade or that Marion is still a good player. And sorry but I'm not losing Jenkins for the hope that Mayo would re-sign with us next year. If we really want him, we'll have as much chance as anyone to sign him next year as he could compete with Jenkins for the starting spot and we'd be able to give him a good contract above the MLE.

BTW the Mavericks already owe the Rockets their 1st round pick this year, unless it's in the top 20 and if it's top 20 they won't be able to trade it away to anyone. At best we could get their 2016 (or 1st available in coming years) pick right now and that's way too far down the line.

Are they not allowed to trade their pick this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...