dawgfan24348 Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 I might have misheard this but on 92.9 The Game, they're saying the Hawks feels good about their chance being the only team that got a face to face sit down with Dwight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rivgambino Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 FalseLakers, Warriors, Mavs, Rockets and ATL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgfan24348 Posted July 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 Maybe I miss heard but I know they feel good about their chances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 When a woman is deciding between 2 guys, I'm pretty sure that both of them feel good about their chances. Problem is that she is really only interested in one of them and the other guy is going look like a sucker after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 When a woman is deciding between 2 guys, I'm pretty sure that both of them feel good about their chances. Problem is that she is really only interested in one of them and the other guy is going look like a sucker after. 4 teams are going to look like suckers in this case. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 4 teams are going to look like suckers in this case. And Dwight is going to look like quite a whore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WraithSentinel Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 They got that from the Espn article last night. It basically said Hawks are the only team from the sit down interview to start moving on with their Free Agency plans. Another word the Hawks dont like their chances of getting Howard. Someone claim some insider here said the interview process with Howard didn't go well for the Hawks. I haven't seen the post yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APE Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 When a woman is deciding between 2 guys, I'm pretty sure that both of them feel good about their chances. Problem is that she is really only interested in one of them and the other guy is going look like a sucker after. The problem is that we're dealing with something worse in this situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 The problem is that we're dealing with something worse in this situation. What, like an unwanted pregnancy or STD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NBASupes Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 Dwight is probably worth 200-400 million dollars to the Hawks organization. His value would sky rocket the Hawks into contention and give Atlanta something they haven't had since Pettit, a true elite HOF big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 Dwight is probably worth 200-400 million dollars to the Hawks organization. His value would sky rocket the Hawks into contention and give Atlanta something they haven't had since Pettit, a true elite HOF big. Dwight is actually one of the least impactful (in terms of marketing) "superstars" in the league. I believe that his jersey isn't even among the top 10 in league sales. His value will come in being a lure for level 2 FA's like 'Dre and Smoove types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag82 Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 What, like an unwanted pregnancy or STD? STD would be a phenomenal nickname for Dwight. I can hear the chants in philips already. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NBASupes Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 Dwight is actually one of the least impactful (in terms of marketing) "superstars" in the league. I believe that his jersey isn't even among the top 10 in league sales. His value will come in being a lure for level 2 FA's like 'Dre and Smoove types. It's not about his national marketability, it's about his local one for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag82 Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 This is an actual question, not trying be a smartass, but realistically what duo you guys think our difference in attendance would be with Dwight? Is he the Kind of guy who fills seats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 This is an actual question, not trying be a smartass, but realistically what duo you guys think our difference in attendance would be with Dwight? Is he the Kind of guy who fills seats? Short term, yes. But unless we get other players and build a winner then it won't make much of a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgfan24348 Posted July 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 They got that from the Espn article last night. It basically said Hawks are the only team from the sit down interview to start moving on with their Free Agency plans. Another word the Hawks dont like their chances of getting Howard. Someone claim some insider here said the interview process with Howard didn't go well for the Hawks. I haven't seen the post yet.I don't think so they're talking about another article and all I've heard it went good both from the radio and ESPN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitte Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 (edited) This is an actual question, not trying be a smartass, but realistically what duo you guys think our difference in attendance would be with Dwight? Is he the Kind of guy who fills seats? He was that kind of guy but he really hurt his image in the last 2 years. Still we would be better than 26th, middle of the pack probably. Edited July 5, 2013 by nitte Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plskeepbibby Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 So dinner with the entire Rockets front office, Deke and Hakeem doesn't count as a face to face meeting???? I'm confused.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 So dinner with the entire Rockets front office, Deke and Hakeem doesn't count as a face to face meeting???? I'm confused.... The initial quote in this thread is wrong... either that or the guys on the radio have no idea what they're talking about. 5 teams had face to face meetings. The Hawks are the only one who've shown any sign of moving on after the signing of Korver, which I don't necessarily agree means they're moving on. But none of the other teams have signed any players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plskeepbibby Posted July 5, 2013 Report Share Posted July 5, 2013 The initial quote in this thread is wrong... either that or the guys on the radio have no idea what they're talking about. 5 teams had face to face meetings. The Hawks are the only one who've shown any sign of moving on after the signing of Korver, which I don't necessarily agree means they're moving on. But none of the other teams have signed any players.The guys on the radio have no idea what they are talking about, it is Rachel that continues saying it, Surprised that "Atlanta sports radio" has no idea what they are talking about, never seen that before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now