Lurker Posted February 20, 2016 Report Share Posted February 20, 2016 (edited) So, which is the real Jeff Teague? Player A: 18.5 PTS/6.3 AST/2.9 REB/1.6 STL on 47.6% FG/40% 3PT/86.9% FT in 30.3 MPG. For good measure +/- thrown in too: +4.3. Player B: 13.2 PTS/5 AST/2.5 REB/1.2 STL on 40.5% FG/40.4% 3PT/83.9% FT in 27.5 MPG. +/- of -2.8. I'll add some more thoughts, but just leaving this here for now... Edited February 20, 2016 by Lurker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member hawkman Posted February 20, 2016 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 20, 2016 12 minutes ago, Lurker said: So, which is the real Jeff Teague? Player A: 18.5 PTS/6.3 AST/2.9 REB/1.6 STL on 47.6% FG/40% 3PT/86.9% FT in 30.3 MPG. For good measure +/- thrown in too: +4.3. Player B: 13.2 PTS/5 AST/2.5 REB/1.2 STL on 40.5% FG/40.4% 3PT/83.9% FT in 27.5 MPG. +/- of -2.8. I'll add some more thoughts, but just leaving this here for now... The one not playing on a sprained ankle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted February 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2016 24 minutes ago, hawkman said: The one not playing on a sprained ankle? I'm completely selling on the idea that his struggles in the second form were ALL ankle. I mean he looked fine after the first two games back for a long enough stretch to make it seem like he was healthy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now