Moderators macdaddy Posted July 19, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Steve Kerr on Iverson Quote: So any team that has a plan in place and is making progress would be very wary of threatening its blueprint by adding Iverson. Then he includes the Hawks as a potential team. I think we have a plan and are making progress. I wouldn't want him here. Anyway, the article makes a lot of good points about the problem of having him on your team. The biggest being the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 I wish people would stop putting Josh Smith in trade scenerios. Childress is the tradeable Josh not Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted July 19, 2006 Author Moderators Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 I agree. And I think neither are very tradeable this year since they both give great produciton for what they are paid. Let's face it, this organization needs cheap production Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NNR100 Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 If the Hawks were to trade Smith and maybe a backup guard, who exactly would be the guys starting in the frontcourt? I don't want Shelden starting, nor Childress. Of course, all this is moot because the Hawks are not dumb enough to let Smith go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 19, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 It's really not about Production, it's about marketability. Our young guns can't do what Ai could do in that capacity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawksFan87 Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Hey fellas I was reading an ESPN article and it was talking about how AI moved his family to the ATL, Now I dont know if that has anything to do with him being traded to us and him wearing the Braves jersey is kind of fishy. But I dont understand signing Speedy and then trading for AI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Quote: ...I dont understand signing Speedy and then trading for AI. Could we include Speedy in a trade for AI? (not saying we should). I thought there were some posts saying you have to keep a guy at least 1 year (?). Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Quote: Could we include Speedy in a trade for AI? (not saying we should). You have to wait three months from the signing or until December 15th, whichever comes first is when FAs just signed can be traded. I may be wrong with the three months part, but I am pretty sure about December 15th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weez Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 this is mroe or less correct ~ there's a couple of caveats (sp) on it thta I can't recall off hand ~ though the general gist is that a player CAN be traded inside that 90 days (assuming that it's not his rookie contract) if he was acquired via trade (single player) or if he's traded as a single player...or something like that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now