Heard something on Fox Sports Net

[mdawg]

On the Best D**N Sports Show, Stephen A. Smith said that the Hawks asked Babcock to resign when they fired Lon Kruger, but he declined. Why didn't they just fire him too? If someone refuses to resign, isn't the next step to fire him? It's things like this that show why the Hawks will never win.

[archie44]

If the Hawks wanted Pete out, he'd be out right now.

[Diesel]

Would pay have anything to do with it?

Lenny Resigned (upon an agreement) and the Hawks agreed to pay him until he found his next gig?

Is it the same with Babs. He was asked to resign because if they fire him, they have to pay him all that they owe him?

I'm sure, they would have moved Billy KNight over into the GM's spot for the time being.

[Vol4ever]

if you notice much of his hype never comes to fruition.