Dream scenario?

[GABALLA]

I was listening to all the chatter about possible trades and free agent pick ups and was wondering, what would be the dream scenario for this off season. well, I think it would have to goo something like this:

First Joe johnson states he will actively pursue other free agents to come to Atlanta. OK, so we need a SF why not go after the best available one on the market Richard Jefferson? If we truly plan on moving Marvin I think this would be the ideal situation. We move Marvin and mike to Golden state and maybe some cash consideration/picks for Monta Ellis, Beidrins. Then we get rid of Joe smith, Collins, or Morris in some combination.

Second we try to get chillz back at a reasonable price. this way we would have three/four viable SF options. RJ, JCHILLZ, JJ, MO

Third we go hard for Shaq. With two or three possible bigs gone we need some more beef. Shaq would be the obvious solution.

So we could roll out a starting lineup next year of: Monta, JJ, RJ, JSMOOVE, HORFORD.

Second unit: Teague, Crawford, Chillz, Zaza, Shaq

Six Man: Crawford/ Chillz. Depending on the situation I see us using either one as the first option off the bench. if we need scoring go with Crawford, foul trouble or size/quickness issues go with chillz.

Free roamer: Mo, He can be used in various situation but his role would be substantially reduced with chillz, RJ, and Crawford on the Team.

So what do you guys think, is this a actual posibility?

....Oh and PLEASE no trade Smoove, Melo, CP3 crap! Those people are obviously just fan and know nothing about basketball what so ever!

[MaceCase]

You pretty much showed your basketball acumen by not only placing Monta at PG but by saying RJ has any basketball value.

Edited July 4, 2010 by CrawfulToCrawesome

[GABALLA]

You pretty much showed your basketball acumen by not only placing Monta at PG but by saying RJ has any basketball value.

really!? Wow!!! So your telling me if the hawks got monta they wouldn't play him at the point LOL!!! What a clown you are, your one of the ones I was telling not to reply to my post because your clearly a fan and not much of a sports guy. LMFAO

....So who played the point before they drafted curry lol!?

oh and RJ not an upgrade to Marvin, genius LOL.

[Unforgiven]

You pretty much showed your basketball acumen by not only placing Monta at PG but by saying RJ has any basketball value.

RJ is still a good player. Pops system didnt work for him in SA

I was listening to all the chatter about possible trades and free agent pick ups and was wondering, what would be the dream scenario for this off season. well, I think it would have to goo something like this:

First Joe johnson states he will actively pursue other free agents to come to Atlanta. OK, so we need a SF why not go after the best available one on the market Richard Jefferson? If we truly plan on moving Marvin I think this would be the ideal situation. We move Marvin and mike to Golden state and maybe some cash consideration/picks for Monta Ellis, Beidrins. Then we get rid of Joe smith, Collins, or Morris in some combination.

Second we try to get chillz back at a reasonable price. this way we would have three/four viable SF options. RJ, JCHILLZ, JJ, MO

Third we go hard for Shaq. With two or three possible bigs gone we need some more beef. Shaq would be the obvious solution.

So we could roll out a starting lineup next year of: Monta, JJ, RJ, JSMOOVE, HORFORD.

Second unit: Teague, Crawford, Chillz, Zaza, Shaq

Six Man: Crawford/ Chillz. Depending on the situation I see us using either one as the first option off the bench. if we need scoring go with Crawford, foul trouble or size/quickness issues go with chillz.

Free roamer: Mo, He can be used in various situation but his role would be substantially reduced with chillz, RJ, and Crawford on the Team.

So what do you guys think, is this a actual posibility?

....Oh and PLEASE no trade Smoove, Melo, CP3 crap! Those people are obviously just fan and know nothing about basketball what so ever!

i would love for this to happen

[MaceCase]

really!? Wow!!! So your telling me if the hawks got monta they wouldn't play him at the point LOL!!! What a clown you are, your one of the ones I was telling not to reply to my post because your clearly a fan and not much of a sports guy. LMFAO

....So who played the point before they drafted curry lol!?

oh and RJ not an upgrade to Marvin, genius LOL.

Their names were Baron Davis, CJ Watson and even Jamal Crawford....yes Monta so much of a point that they played Jamal at PG instead of him.

As for Jefferson, he played most the season as a 2nd option in the starting lineup and as a 3rd option overall due to Parker being injured nearly half the season and barely outproduced the 5th option Marvin.

I'm fan of the NBA and I'm clearly more knowledgable than you on the topic but please continue the insults oh sports fan.

[Diesel]

OK,...

My Dream Scenario...

First: Trade Smoove/Bibby/Crawford for Paul/Okafor.

Second: Marvin Williams for Joel Pryzbillia.

Third Sign Chillz.

Fourth: Sign Matt Barnes and Frabrico Oberto.

Fifth: Sign Sherron Collins.

Team:

Paul/Teague/Collins

Joe/Crawford

Chillz/Barnes/Mo

Horf/Oberto

Okafor/Pryz/Zaza

[GABALLA]

Their names were Baron Davis, CJ Watson and even Jamal Crawford....yes Monta so much of a point that they played Jamal at PG instead of him.

As for Jefferson, he played most the season as a 2nd option in the starting lineup and as a 3rd option overall due to Parker being injured nearly half the season and barely outproduced the 5th option Marvin.

I'm fan of the NBA and I'm clearly more knowledgable than you on the topic but please continue the insults oh sports fan.

LOL yeah right except when davis was injured/is injured, they definitely played him at the point for a substantial portion of the until the draft. we are talking about recent history not 06. such a whistling jackass.

[GABALLA]

OK,...

My Dream Scenario...

First: Trade Smoove/Bibby/Crawford for Paul/Okafor.

Second: Marvin Williams for Joel Pryzbillia.

Third Sign Chillz.

Fourth: Sign Matt Barnes and Frabrico Oberto.

Fifth: Sign Sherron Collins.

Team:

Paul/Teague/Collins

Joe/Crawford

Chillz/Barnes/Mo

Horf/Oberto

Okafor/Pryz/Zaza

did you not see the part where I said idiouts plz don't reply with crap about paul or trading smoove. If you think okafor is better than smoove than your disabled no way the combo of horford and okafor would be more porductive starters. was okafor an all-star or close to it...HELL NOO!! so please, your entitled to your opinion but maybe you should rather try expressing without your head in the toilet. just a suggestion.

[MaceCase]

LOL yeah right except when davis was injured/is injured, they definitely played him at the point for a substantial portion of the until the draft. we are talking about recent history not 06. such a whistling jackass.

Cute with the insults but lets try this: Baron played and started all 82 games in 07 and in 08 Jamal just so happened to be their starting PG for the majority of the time. in 09 Curry, a rookie, started most games at PG and CJ Watson the rest but please, enlighten me more about how Monta is a PG and not an undersized 2guard that seems to have everyone and everybody move him out the PG position. Seems that you are the only jackass that is referencing 06 which was Ellis' rookie year and only year he played any amount of games at PG due to Baron's injury and not once in the 3 years after. I would like to hear your theory on how reality occurred and defied your expert opinion but aye, I'm only a "fan".

Edited July 5, 2010 by CrawfulToCrawesome

[Diesel]

did you not see the part where I said idiouts plz don't reply with crap about paul or trading smoove. If you think okafor is better than smoove than your disabled no way the combo of horford and okafor would be more porductive starters. was okafor an all-star or close to it...HELL NOO!! so please, your entitled to your opinion but maybe you should rather try expressing without your head in the toilet. just a suggestion.

Dude, You need to chill. Paul is greater than Smoove. Period. Okafor plays better defense than Smoove. Period. Okafor is a better C choice than Horf. Period. The move gives us a player who can help us with our logjammed PF Spot and one of the best PGs in the game.

[ATLBob]

OK,...

My Dream Scenario...

First: Trade Smoove/Bibby/Crawford for Paul/Okafor.

Second: Marvin Williams for Joel Pryzbillia.

Third Sign Chillz.

Fourth: Sign Matt Barnes and Frabrico Oberto.

Fifth: Sign Sherron Collins.

Team:

Paul/Teague/Collins

Joe/Crawford

Chillz/Barnes/Mo

Horf/Oberto

Okafor/Pryz/Zaza

That's one of your nicer squad's D.

[GABALLA]

Dude, You need to chill. Paul is greater than Smoove. Period. Okafor plays better defense than Smoove. Period. Okafor is a better C choice than Horf. Period. The move gives us a player who can help us with our logjammed PF Spot and one of the best PGs in the game.

I'll relax i'm just tired of this thread where people state stupid things like you just did. DONE!

[Diesel]

I'll relax i'm just tired of this thread where people state stupid things like you just did. DONE!

I can defend each of my proposals. What's tiring is you offer the word stupid with no point? So you don't feel like we can get Chris Paul? Newsflash, it's not about your feelings. Save your feelings for your local bookclub or your Harlequem Romances. It's about what's possible and what we have to offer. N.O. would be silly not to consider the Smoove, Bibby and Crawford in Trade for Okafor and Paul. Smoove has definite star potential and Crawford is a player. I don't think they would get a better deal unless they swapped Paul out for Melo. Even then, I don't know if it's a better deal because they don't gain any of that precious cap.

So before you start using the label stupid, be prepared to say why it's stupid other than your feelings. Put your feelings on a love song and sale it, but don't bring that s--- to Hawksquawk.

[GABALLA]

I can defend each of my proposals. What's tiring is you offer the word stupid with no point? So you don't feel like we can get Chris Paul? Newsflash, it's not about your feelings. Save your feelings for your local bookclub or your Harlequem Romances. It's about what's possible and what we have to offer. N.O. would be silly not to consider the Smoove, Bibby and Crawford in Trade for Okafor and Paul. Smoove has definite star potential and Crawford is a player. I don't think they would get a better deal unless they swapped Paul out for Melo. Even then, I don't know if it's a better deal because they don't gain any of that precious cap.

So before you start using the label stupid, be prepared to say why it's stupid other than your feelings. Put your feelings on a love song and sale it, but don't bring that s--- to Hawksquawk.

um yeah I don't thinks it's possible because we would have to give up some key players mainly smoove to get him and that's not going to happen, so just cut the crap! It is more than apparent that the idea here is to build around joe, al, and smoove but you guys constantly CONSTANTLY keep talking about "oh we need to trade smoove" when it's not going to happen. let me ask you a question why would the hawks bother to pitch to joe that we have two 10 players on our team in al and smith if they were just going to trade one of them? I'm mean seriously come on! This is why I keep saying you guys are fans and are complelty void of any sense of what's actually a possibility for the team at this point based on recent events and the clear direction they are going. the Melo trade is the only thing that I see as a posiblity becasue we could convince them to move him while keeping the 3 main guys. example: denver stated they would trade him if he doesn't resign, so the hawks could put together a package deal of marvin, bibby, and possibly chillz. now why would denver take these guys and not demand smoove. well, it's a matter of need. they don't need him!!!!! they don't need a guy to play PF, no way smoove can replace Melo, so they would need to address that with multiple guys i.e. Marvin/chillz. Now why Bibby? well, if Melo does leave it's a good possiblity billups would either get moved or demand one, that would leave lawson to run the show and bibby could be a good solid vet to play point.(not saying he would start).

Now back to this Okafor, Paul crap. NO CHANCE IN HELL that okafor is a better fit for this team then smoove. not a chance him and al on the floor at the same time is more productive than our current line up. like I said before the only marquee guy I see us potentially acquiring is melo, and that's a long shot. the hawks will acquire shaq in free agency, trade marvin, to golden state for either monta or beidrin, chillz will be back, and other free agents will sign but mark my words their will be some variety of what I just stated on the radar for the remainder of the off season. So please stop wasting time talking about hoop dreams that will never happen int his life or the next!!!

[GABALLA]

I can defend each of my proposals. What's tiring is you offer the word stupid with no point? So you don't feel like we can get Chris Paul? Newsflash, it's not about your feelings. Save your feelings for your local bookclub or your Harlequem Romances. It's about what's possible and what we have to offer. N.O. would be silly not to consider the Smoove, Bibby and Crawford in Trade for Okafor and Paul. Smoove has definite star potential and Crawford is a player. I don't think they would get a better deal unless they swapped Paul out for Melo. Even then, I don't know if it's a better deal because they don't gain any of that precious cap.

So before you start using the label stupid, be prepared to say why it's stupid other than your feelings. Put your feelings on a love song and sale it, but don't bring that s--- to Hawksquawk.

Your right N.O. would be silly not to consider it, I just don't see it happening. I'll calm down I just feel as though their are a lot of people here who work for ESPN or something with some of the things they say. Anyway I'm done with this, their is no point arguing about something when neither of us know what's going to happen. I could be completely wrong. maybe I shouldn't have insulted people, O.K your right but it wasn't said with the intent to hurt feelings (If it did). Just a little trash talk, you know a little competitive banter never hurt anyone....or has it?

LOL. What ever new topic...

[DrReality]

Has anyone ever won a disagreement with Diesel. Rhetorical question.