RAHMOR Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 With all of these post being pulled up from two and three years ago and people saying they called this and that, why don't we try a little something diffent. There are a few people on this board who when they feel strongly about something they put it in their sig. For all the other who like to call people out let's see if they are willing to do the same. But let's do it fantasy GM style. On situtations that are upcoming like whether to keep Al, whether to trade Chilz, or whether to resign Royal after this season, put it in your Sig and keep it there long enough to be proven right or wrong. When we find out our draft position put it in your sig who you want to draft and keep it there. I'll start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shock Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 whether to trade chill? that's not even a situation that's come up bk wants chill here long-term and isn't shopping chill...what caused this 'situation' to come up? a few fans wanna trade him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuteke Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 i've tried to do that but i'm not computer savvy enough to get it figured out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuteke Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 ok so maybe i don't give myself enough credit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeye Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 I had this one for a while now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAdams_1 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 You again. After thinking about your JChill vs. TMac comparison I realized TMac was the exception where JChill will obviously be the norm. No way he becomes the leader/star on a team. TMac was much more fluid and typical. JChill looks like a train wreck shooting the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 prince was 10/4.8 in his 2nd year, getting 33mpg btw, chill may only be 9/5 in his 2nd year, but he's doing it in 28 mins and shooting 54% from the field and 47% from 3pt range Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAdams_1 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Prince is not a leader / star on his team. He is the 4th option on his team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAdams_1 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Also, it is easy to shoot high % when you don't hardly shoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAdams_1 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Hey MW24, you prima donna, how bout an answer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 I don't understand why you keep defending Childress since your site 82games.com has him as the worst ranked defender on the team. The Hawks give up 5.2 more pts when he is in the game, worse than Harrington (4.1) and Lue (2.9). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 we also score more when he's in the game and he has a + affect on the game, unlike al and he doesn't stop ball movement like al; he gets his points in the flow of the game he's also a decent perimeter defender and will be an above average perimeter defender in the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAdams_1 Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Your dreaming. Once again the guy is a good player not a great one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Quote: he's also a decent perimeter defender and will be an above average perimeter defender in the future Where do you get that from? Looks to me like he is just too slow to be a good defender. He is last on the team in defense if you go by the +/- stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeye Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Ok why do you hate Chill so much. HE is one of few in our team that plays with heart. Do you even watch hawks games if you do you would realize that it dosent matter how many points he averages as long as he is taking smart shots that's why his field goal % is so high. I rather have him score 8 points and shoot 54% than 10 points and 40% from field. He is not focing shots and that's the bottom line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeye Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Only Ivey and Joe are better perimeter defenders then Chill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Huh? first of all I didn't even comment on his offense I was talking about his defense, or lack thereof. I was wondering why nic was defending him when nic's favorite site has Childress listed clearly as the worst defender on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeye Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Quote: Also, it is easy to shoot high % when you don't hardly shoot. I answered that question above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Just make sure you reply to the right person or it gets confusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now