DrReality Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 1. We pay Al $10 million for one year. Don't know if this would fly. But if we can't trade him we could give him what he wants. Question is if we were under negotiations. 2. David Anderson. To this point it was thought that he'd be too expensive to bring over. But since we can't make any other moves, we could pay him 5 millions (or whatever) a year and get another big. Hell pay him 10 million just to spite Belkin. To the Spirits credit, they have done whatever they could after each court ruling. They have not sat around like lame ducks. Seems to me they'd be motivated to do some creative things for the sake of the team and piss off Belkin. Still curious what Sekou has to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shug94 Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 I LOVE point 2. Anderson gives us depth and an experienced player in practice. Plus it might piss off Belkin a little bit. So that is awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeti Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Is it even possible for us to sign Speedy, Andersen, or resign Al (a free agent) under the new court ruling. Sounds like the team can do nothing now. We are stuck with the players we've signed, minus Al. Can we even SIGN Shelden? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final_quest Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Read AHF's post titled Breakfast with Bernie for your answers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeti Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 I just did. Thanks!! Things seem less dark now. -- but it still STINKS !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now