Plainview1981 Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6081601317.html It's about time. The h*ll the parents must have went through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin chillzatl Posted August 17, 2006 Admin Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 it's interesting, I watched a thing about this case on courtTV no more than a week ago and they were saying that one of the major unresolved clues of the investigation was a couple of spots of blood on her underwear that didn't match anyone associated with the family. But this DNA was in the national database and if the owner ever had a sample added it would trigger a positive match and they would have him. I wonder if this is how they got the guy. Interestingly, they were saying on TV this morning that it's possible that the guy might not be the killer. That he could just be a nut job. So far they haven't tested him against the DNA evidence or gotten specifics from him about what he supposedly did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornandDieHawks Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 According to some news outlets, the police have been in contact with this guy through the internet for a while and he knew things about the case never released to the public. Hopefully they got the right guy..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kudzu23 Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Check out the sketch a psychic did back in 1998. Pretty spot on!! http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murd...pilogue_12.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 I hope it's the right person but I'm skeptical. Who wouldn't rather be over here on trial for the JBenet killing than in a Thai jail...especially if they could reverse their confession and claim to just be a nut. The U.S. wouldn't likely extradite the guy back to Thailand. There's more to this than meets the eye in my conspiratorial mind. It'll be interesting to see if his ex. really can show that he was in Alabama at the time of the killing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Man Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 i'm also a skeptic. there's seriously somethin wrong with this guy's psyche. it's hard to imagine this shifty-eyed creep teaching 2nd grade! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 you expected the guy who murdered an innocent child to be a rational, intelligent man? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted August 18, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 Quote: it's interesting, I watched a thing about this case on courtTV no more than a week ago and they were saying that one of the major unresolved clues of the investigation was a couple of spots of blood on her underwear that didn't match anyone associated with the family. But this DNA was in the national database and if the owner ever had a sample added it would trigger a positive match and they would have him. I wonder if this is how they got the guy. Interestingly, they were saying on TV this morning that it's possible that the guy might not be the killer. That he could just be a nut job. So far they haven't tested him against the DNA evidence or gotten specifics from him about what he supposedly did. I got to admit, something in my gut tells me this is the wrong guy. But there's stuff that points to him right now. So, we shall see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Man Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 Quote: you expected the guy who murdered an innocent child to be a rational, intelligent man? not at all. but i don't think this guy is the murderer. i think he's just insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted August 20, 2006 Report Share Posted August 20, 2006 yeah I don't disagree. I was just saying that whoever raped and killed this child is obviously crazy on some level Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted August 22, 2006 Report Share Posted August 22, 2006 I'm no specialist on lunatic sex-pervs...but wasn't this dude inquiring about a sex-change? Usually guys who want to be girls like guys. I got a wierd feeling about this deal from what I've heard. Wondering if he's not a willing patsy in this deal... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted August 22, 2006 Report Share Posted August 22, 2006 Well now they're saying that there's a picture of him in atlanta on the day of the murder. It seems increasingly likely that he's not the murderer. It also seems increasingly clear that this guy should not be on the streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted August 23, 2006 Report Share Posted August 23, 2006 Drudgereport.com has a link to article titled below. "As the case against John Mark Karr disintegrates, attention turns to CU prof Michael Tracey, who's fingered false suspects in the past." Looks like the whole JB media frenzy might me falling apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 Boulder DA has dropped teh charges on Karr per multiple sources - DNA analysis was not a match. As many were thinking - apparently the guy is a loony - but not a murderer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now