BigDirty Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 I don't know how credible this guy is, but what he writes is in conflict with an earlier report that said, that no other team offered Childress even the MLE. The article features some quotes from Childress about playing in Greece, so I guess it has to be somewhat true. Quote: [...] According to Josh Childress, there were championship-contending NBA teams that were willing to pay him more than the Hawks would. A sign-and-trade couldn't be worked out, so Childress was stuck. [...] Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 In this case, I believe they are referring to the Spurs. The Spurs probably contracted Childress about numbers for a contract, and they might have even gotten a good number for a contract that Childress would agree to. But, in a SnT the Spurs had to work with Sund and I imagine Sund was not willing to do a deal, essentailly screwing Childress but protecting the Hawks by not taking on unwanted/needed parts. I imagine no team offered Childress the MLE because he told them he would not sign for less than that, and even if they did offer him the MLE the Hawks were certain to match and that would tie up that team's MLE for 7 days waiting on the Hawks to match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Didn't Sekou say there were a few offers for him, or was that Smoove? Pretty sure it was Chill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crimedog Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Well I'm sure there were offers for SnTs. There always are. Most probably aren't realistic though. Once Chil got the contract offer from the Greeks, any team that wanted Chil to agree to play for them would at least have to offer something competitive to that. We know teams wanted Childress but if they didn't want to pay big bucks for him, there is nothing we could do in terms of SnTs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDirty Posted July 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 If it was the Spurs I hope they only offered total crap cause I think they actually have some cheap players that could've been useful to us. Something like Oberto or Mason (+ Udoka or Mahinmi, depending on Chillz contract) would've worked with Chillz BYC status right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Mason could not be involved in a deal because he just signed a contract, Spurs need to wait until Dec. 15th before they could trade him. Oberto makes $3.6 million, Bonner $3 mil, Vaughn $1.3 mil, Udoka $1 mil, Mahinmi 860k. It all depends on what Childress' contract started at. If it was $7 million, then we could only take back 125% +100k of $3.5 mil (so $4.475 mil). Mix and match with those guys above and we could only get Oberto and Mahinmi (I don't know who he is, if he just signed a contract we couldn't get him or if he was drafted we couldn't get him). So just mix and match, but I hope I have explained it well enough to get the picture. EDIT: Sorry, but from San Antonio's perspective they must give away at least $5.5 million in order to be within 125% + 100k, so nothing could work in this scenario. We need to have more salary involved to get both of our 125%+100k to be within the same range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexmethylphenidate Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Oberto + 1st rounder is a fair deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDirty Posted July 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Thanks. But Sund and the ASG are so slow that they would've needed until December to fax the trade papers to the league office anyway, so Mason could've been very well included in the trade. Mahinmi is their french center that they parked in the D-League for most of last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted July 24, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Quote: Oberto + 1st rounder is a fair deal. But not one that would've worked under the CBA. Childress + Zaza -for- Oberto and stuff might've worked, but I don't blame the ASG for being squimish if that was the offer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLBob Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Quote: Quote: Oberto + 1st rounder is a fair deal. But not one that would've worked under the CBA. Childress + Zaza -for- Oberto and stuff might've worked, but I don't blame the ASG for being squimish if that was the offer... Besides, what do we need another PF for. Between Smoove and Horf, where would he get minutes. We'd have a 3-million dollar player taking Solo's spot on the pine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swish Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Quote: Oberto + 1st rounder is a fair deal. No it isn't. Chills/Zaza for Oberto/Mason/pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now