jerrywest Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 Maximized JJ Bibby Flip Mo Evans Zaza Chill AJ Leu Underdeveloped and underutilized Boris D. Smoove Marv Horf Acie Solo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawkItus Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 Maximized JJ Bibby Flip Mo Evans Zaza Chill AJ Leu Underdeveloped and underutilized Boris D. Smoove Marv Horf Acie Solo Disagree on Smoove and Horf. He's gotten the best out of a very raw Smith. Horford should have been rookie of the year on a playoff team. That's hard to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crimedog Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 Disagree on Smoove and Horf. He's gotten the best out of a very raw Smith. Horford should have been rookie of the year on a playoff team. That's hard to do. Gotta disagree with you on that. Not gonna touch the whole list but I don't see how you can say Smith and Al wouldn't be an amazing front-court for an up-tempo team that ran the hell out of the pick and roll because they can both get to the hoop, catch the ball on the move, and finish in traffic so well. Again, I think this is conflating unexpected results with credit without substantive analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 I think that there needs to be a middle ground and there should be 2 columns. One for what Woody has/hasn't gotten out of the player and the other for what the player has/hasn't gotten out of themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted February 11, 2009 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 I disagree on Smith and Solo. Smith has just been slow to adjust to what Woodson wants IMHO, and Solomon just isn't that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crimedog Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 I disagree on Smith and Solo. Smith has just been slow to adjust to what Woodson wants IMHO, and Solomon just isn't that good. Solo is true, but it is hard for a guy like Smith to adapt to his role in Woodson's offense because he doesn't have the shot to be catching it that far out that often. Even if he makes the right decision and drives the ball from 17 feet, he's driving too far. To me this is a lot less about "coaching up" or not and more about playing to your players strengths. If Woody is pushing Josh into a roll that doesn't play to his strengths, well I guess you can say that its not Woody's fault that Josh just isn't a good shooter, but there are very few power forwards in the league who are asked to rotate like that on offense and play off of a ball dominant wing, and many that are asked to take long jumpers like that are better shooters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted February 11, 2009 Moderators Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 I think that there needs to be a middle ground and there should be 2 columns. One for what Woody has/hasn't gotten out of the player and the other for what the player has/hasn't gotten out of themselves. I have a hard time putting any player purely in either column. Take Josh Smith, Bibby, and Marvin for example. Bibby - you can put him underutilized because we haven't taken advantage of the pick and roll enough with him. You can also put him in maximized in many ways because Woodson has gotten a lot out of him. Josh Smith is a success story for Woodson letting him take on enough and develop during his time. At the same time, you can definitely say that Woodson hasn't gotten as much as he could out of him because he has given Josh too much rope. When Woodson should have been declaring 3pters off limits and forcing him to shift his focus to interior scoring and rebounding, Woodson let him float on the perimeter and shoot too many jumpers for far too long. And that is just part of his game. Is letting Josh Smith take the ball up the floor on fast breaks underutilizing or maximizing? Too simple. Another player is Marvin Williams, it is easy to look at TS% or EFG% and say "underutilized" but a signfiicant chunk of blame falls on Marvin for not being more assertive as well. So he is clearly underutilized but that hardly tells the full story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 I have a hard time putting any player purely in either column. Take Josh Smith, Bibby, and Marvin for example. Bibby - you can put him underutilized because we haven't taken advantage of the pick and roll enough with him. You can also put him in maximized in many ways because Woodson has gotten a lot out of him. Josh Smith is a success story for Woodson letting him take on enough and develop during his time. At the same time, you can definitely say that Woodson hasn't gotten as much as he could out of him because he has given Josh too much rope. When Woodson should have been declaring 3pters off limits and forcing him to shift his focus to interior scoring and rebounding, Woodson let him float on the perimeter and shoot too many jumpers for far too long. And that is just part of his game. Is letting Josh Smith take the ball up the floor on fast breaks underutilizing or maximizing? Too simple. Another player is Marvin Williams, it is easy to look at TS% or EFG% and say "underutilized" but a signfiicant chunk of blame falls on Marvin for not being more assertive as well. So he is clearly underutilized but that hardly tells the full story. If I were really to create a survey for this it has to have over|under utilized by Woody and maximized|minimized by Woody and maximized|minimized by the player since the player obviously cannot over or under utilize themself. I agree with your assessments on those players though. I just think this would have to be a little more in depth than the original question asks in order to get an accurate assessment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureGreatness Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 (edited) if smith was playing for any other coach would he be a better player? i think so Edited February 11, 2009 by hoodstar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnDawg Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 If I were really to create a survey for this it has to have over|under utilized by Woody and maximized|minimized by Woody and maximized|minimized by the player since the player obviously cannot over or under utilize themself. I agree with your assessments on those players though. I just think this would have to be a little more in depth than the original question asks in order to get an accurate assessment. Totally agree with the need for another column. I have a hard time giving Woody credit for maximizing Smith and Bibby..... basically Woody stated " that with Bibby, all he has to do is give him the ball and let him do his thing" (me paraphrasing). That is because of the experience Bibby already had, not anything Woody created with his game planning. As for Smitty....we have read several stories of past offseasons where HE went and sought help to improve his game outside of what the Hawks...ie Woody... provided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 I think he is doing better with the current team and allowing some of the guys off the bench play. Tonight Flip was amazing. Za has been solid and Mo comes aroudn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now