Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

What, No Barry?


Diesel

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member

I say that this is the biggest railroading in the history of Sports.

Prosecutors have An angry mistress, a drug dealing friend, and a dislikable guy... and they will try to put Barry Bonds away with that.

It seems that they can't put a needle in Barry's hand.

There is no Smoking gun.

Justice is bowing down to the power of the media.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I say that this is the biggest railroading in the history of Sports.

Prosecutors have An angry mistress, a drug dealing friend, and a dislikable guy... and they will try to put Barry Bonds away with that.

It seems that they can't put a needle in Barry's hand.

There is no Smoking gun.

Justice is bowing down to the power of the media.

Barry is guilty. Hopefully they nail him for it. If they don't, a guilty man will get off for lack of evidence and hopefully give his drug dealing trainer a nice bump for spending two years in jail to keep Bonds out of it. The witness did put a needle in Barry's body so they should at least nail him for that. (He testified he was never injected.)

Now, I don't mind someone arguing this isn't a good use of tax payer money. That is a very legit argument. However, the guy deserves to get nailed for his blatant lies just like Roger Clemens, Rafael Palmeiro, and others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Premium Member

This wasn’t supposed to happen in Barack Obama’s America. We were told that these sorts of prosecutions wouldn’t be the priority of an Eric Holder Justice Department. But just as Guantanamo Bay detention centers and military tribunals have remained in place, the perjury witch-hunt trial of Major League Baseball’s home run king, Barry Lamar Bonds, continued unabated and has now reached a predictably ugly conclusion.

After seven years, and millions of dollars in court costs, Bonds has been found guilty of obstruction of justice. As for the all-important three perjury charges, the jury couldn’t agree whether Bonds lied to a grand jury investigating the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative (BALCO) when he swore under oath that he never knowingly took performance enhancing drugs. Without corroborating evidence from Bonds’s trainer and lifelong friend Greg Anderson, the jury could was deadlocked and the Judge declared a mistrial on all perjury charges. But the obstruction of justice conviction makes Bonds a convicted felon, and sets him up for a May 20th hearing where he could get as many as 10 years behind bars.

What did Bonds do to “obstruct justice”? According to one juror, “Steve,” the obstruction of justice charge was reached because, "The whole grand jury testimony was a series of evasive answers. There were pointed questions that were asked two or three or four different ways that never got clearly answered. That's how we came to that.'' Wow. Apparently, a “series of evasive answers” lines you up for a 10-year sentence behind bars. By that standard, d*ck Cheney, Karl Rove, and Scooter Libby should be breaking rocks in Leavenworth for their performance at the Valerie Plame trial.

As BALCO founder Victor Conte - who is no friend of Bonds - said to USA Today, "This verdict absolutely makes no sense to me. Of all of these counts, the one that makes the least sense to me is the obstruction charge. Tell me how there was obstruction of justice. This is all about the selected persecution of Barry Bonds. This is not fair. I was the heavy in this. I accepted full responsibility and the consequences and went to prison. How is that obstruction? Doesn't make sense.”

It doesn’t. After all the public money, drama, and hysterics, this is what we’re left with. He was “evasive." Keep in mind that we live in a country where the US Department of Justice has not pursued one person for the investment banking fraud that cratered the US economy in 2008. Not one indictment has been issued to a single Bush official on charges of ordering torture or lying to provoke an invasion of Iraq. Instead, we get farcical reality television like the US vs Barry Bonds.

This was a trial where you longed for the somber dignity of a Judge Judy. Since Anderson wouldn’t talk, the government was left with two real witnesses: Kimberly Bell, Bonds mistress, brought in to discuss his sexual dysfunctions resulting from steroids, and Steve Hoskins, the business manager whom Bonds fired for alleged theft and fraud. But their real star was a once-anonymous IRS official named Jeff Novitsky, who has proudly seen Bonds as an all-consuming obsession, U.S. Constitution be damned.

ESPN legal expert Lester Munson described the verdict as “a majortriumph for federal agent Jeff Novitzky.” That alone should chill our bones. Without a warrant, Novitzky started his BALCO investigation by rooting through Victor Conte’s trash and taking it back to his house to sift through in his leisure hours. But Conte was a nothing to Novitzky. From the beginning, his sights were on Barry Bonds.

Jonathan Littman of Yahoo! Sports wrote, “two agents working on the case knew that Novitzky ‘hated' Bonds, and heard him brag about his hopes to cash in on a book deal. The agents demanded to see copies of his reports and were rebuffed by federal officials. Novitzky, however, was given carte blanche by the head of the IRS to drop the normal duties of an IRS agent -- investigating tax fraud and money laundering -- and became our de facto national sports doping czar.”

In 2004, accompanied by eleven agents, Novitsky marched into the offices of sports-drug testing monolith Comprehensive Drug Testing. Carrying a warrant which authorized him to see the sealed drug tests of just ten baseball players, he paraded out with 4,000 supposedly confidential medical files, including records for every baseball player in the Major leagues. As Jon Pessah wrote in ESPN the Magazine, "Three federal judges reviewed the raid. One asked, incredulously, if the Fourth Amendment had been repealed. Another, Susan Illston, who has presided over the BALCO trials, called Novitzky's actions a 'callous disregard' for constitutional rights. All three instructed him to return the records. Instead, Novitzky kept the evidence..."

During closing arguments, Bonds’s attorney, Cristina Arguedas, looked at the jury as she pointed at the prosecution, accused them of misconduct and asked, "Why are we even here?"

It’s a good question. But asking the question is much safer than answering it. We’re here because Major League Baseball and the US government has long decided that Barry Bonds would shoulder the burden for the steroid era. We’re here because a surly Black athlete who thinks that the press is just a step above vermin was easy pickings for an industry rife with systemic corruption. Major League Baseball made billions off of the steroid era, an era many now see as a rancid, tainted lie. It was an era where owners became obscenely wealthy and billions in public funds were spent on ballparks. The press cheered and America dug the long ball. Now the dust has cleared, our cities have been looted, Barry Bonds could be going to prison, and Commissioner Bud Selig still has a job - and a RAISE. With apologies to Harvey Dent, this is the story of the Black athlete today: die a hero or live long enough to be a villain. And the men in the suits walk – or in Selig’s case, slouch - all the way to the bank.

Around the start of the trial, nearly a decade ago, Bonds said, "This is something we, as African-American athletes, live with every day. I don't need a headline that says, 'Bonds says there's racism in the game of baseball.' We all know it. It's just that some people don't want to admit it. They're going to play dumb like they don't know what the hell is going on." We shouldn’t play dumb either. Both President Obama and Attorney General Holder said words to the effect that the US government would no longer be in the steroid-inspection business. Like so much else in the last two years, it was just words.

yep

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

It is stunning to me that the jury didn't reach a conviction on the perjury charge related to the injection. There was undisputed testimony that he did it and Anderson talked on the tape about injecting him.

It was an 11-1 vote to convict so they didn't quite get there. The holdout juror said she almost voted to convict but just felt like it wasn't quite beyond reasonable doubt.

Bonds' 13 attorney legal team definitely earned their fees but not even that group could turn a pig's ear into a silk purse. The guy blatantly lied and it is only thanks to his buddy spending a year in jail to avoid testifying that he wasn't convicted on all 4 counts. I hope for his sake that after spending all that time in jail to avoid convicting Bonds that he ends up with a retirement home in the Carribean or something. That is one heck of a price to pay as a former drug dealer to avoid fingering one of your former buyers.

I think it is fair to question whether this is money well spent going after Bonds and Clemens but to throw a pity party and act like this is the plight of the poor black athlete is asinine. The guy is rich as hell and if he just did the same thing that Andy Pettite and others did, HE HAD COMPLETE IMMUNITY. Only by lying and obstructing did he open the door on this. Roger Clemens is going to suffer the same fate, which just goes to show this isn't a black/white issue so much as the fact that two high profile guys blatantly lied even when they had total immunity for telling the truth.

Edited by AHF
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...