Churchill Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 Saying we get #1 and they get #3 and the F.O. wants to draft a PG and not Bogut. Atl trades #1, Harrington Receives #3, Okur, Harpring With #3 ATL drafts Deron or Paul SL - Okur/Harpring/Smith/Childress/Deron or Paul. Doesn't make much sense for Utah though does it? They would have Boozer/AK47/AH and looking at Marvin/Bogut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troubleman Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 The trade doesn't make much sense for the Hawks in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 ugh@this trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Churchill Posted May 15, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 yeah it is pretty bad eh? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pathway23 Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 the lineup would be Okur/Smoove/Harpring/Chill/PG but I still wouldn't do it. Okur was overrated before he was signed last year, and Harpring doesn't really seem to fit BK's plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBAreject Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 While we're at it.. #1 + Harrington/Delk to NY for Tim Thomas/Penny Hardaway/#8 pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DominiqueWilkins Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 Quote: Saying we get #1 and they get #3 and the F.O. wants to draft a PG and not Bogut. Atl trades #1, Harrington Receives #3, Okur, Harpring With #3 ATL drafts Deron or Paul SL - Okur/Harpring/Smith/Childress/Deron or Paul. Doesn't make much sense for Utah though does it? They would have Boozer/AK47/AH and looking at Marvin/Bogut. That would just be a stupid trade for the Hawks to make. I like Okur, but not as the Hawks center, and I must decline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final_quest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Why would you take two bad contracts, trade one solid player (Harrington), to move down 7 spots in the draft? I think NY would give away either one of those players, they are actually trade liabilities. I would not trade pick #31 Al/Delk for pick #8 Hardaway/TT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBAreject Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 I was hoping someone would bite. Sarcasm, my man. I just posted something a shade more ridiculous than what he posted. I don't even want to think about moving down and picking up mediocre players with bloated deals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now