thesheedera Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 ...and before we even see how our players can do with this legit 1 there are more trade proposals than ever including Marvin, Smith and Childress. Seems backwards to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oiatlhawksfan Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Quote: ...and before we even see how our players can do with this legit 1 there are more trade proposals than ever including Marvin, Smith and Childress. Seems backwards to me. seems stupid to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesheedera Posted February 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 It seemed so obvious before that having such a lack of talent at PG made life a lot more difficult for all the other players on the court. They've been handicapped in a sense, and I can't wait to see who/what they might be with a legit 1 on the floor. If any of them show no improvement at all, then yeah, let's look for trades. But let's see what we have first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 People weren't really talking about trades until the BK trade for a 5 mention. I don't think we need to make a move for a starting 5 but if we are doing it then why not try and figure out who it would be? I am skeptical that BK is actually trying to get a starting 5 but I suppose it's possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesheedera Posted February 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 That makes some sense. But I guess what's bothering me is that some posters seem almost enthusiastic about getting rid of one or more of our core players. I'd be all for moving one or more to significantly improve the team. But I would only be excited about what we'd be bringing in and I'd be sad to see one of these guys go. It seems like some posters are just jumping at the chance to see one of them pack there bags, even for a marginal trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTruth Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Quote: People weren't really talking about trades until the BK trade for a 5 mention. I don't think we need to make a move for a starting 5 but if we are doing it then why not try and figure out who it would be? I am skeptical that BK is actually trying to get a starting 5 but I suppose it's possible. I would hope that it is more for a big defensive-minded, rebounding vet--as a backup. Zaza is NOT the answer at backup and Solomon hasnt gotten near enough PT for us to know whether he is decent enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 I hope that none of our core are traded and I really think they deserve a chance to play with a real PG to assess their true value. It's not too difficult to imagine that all of our core players could put up better numbers just with Bibby's presence and playmaking ability and it would truly suck to trade them before they got a chance to show it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesheedera Posted February 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 I agree. Unless it's another deal that CLEARLY makes us better. Bibby won't be dropping 10+ dimes a game, but his presence as a scoring threat, a floor spreader, and a better than adequate distributor should help each of our players significantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexmethylphenidate Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 I wonder if Bibby presence makes Josh Smith want to pass the ball to him on a fast break? I'd like to get an easy two rather than hold my breath to see if Smith fumbles the ball or throw it away in the seats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Quote: ...and before we even see how our players can do with this legit 1 there are more trade proposals than ever including Marvin, Smith and Childress. Seems backwards to me. You think that's bad. All hell will break loose if things don't gel perfectly in one of the first two games. Bibby will be a "bust" and it will be trade proposals galore In reality Bibby should make everyone on this team better. Not because he's Nash, but because of the space he will create by being a 3 point threat and because he is more likely to push the basketball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSavvyNation Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 If Smoove could start commanding a double team in the post, our offense could really shine. IMO, the three things that we have been missing most in our offense are: 1) PG who could penetrate and break down defenses 2) Outside shooting 3) Post presence who could command a double team, freeing up a shooter for an open look Hopefully, #1 and #2 were answered by getting Bibby. If Smoove could handle #3 our half court offense would be ideal. zbo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Quote: ...and before we even see how our players can do with this legit 1 there are more trade proposals than ever including Marvin, Smith and Childress. Seems backwards to me. The following players should be kept for the rest of the season (unless a knockout deal comes along): Bibby, Smoove, Marvin, Al, JJ, and Chillz. Keep them unless it's a complete upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now