Lets see how many of us can guess both of the Hawks picks correctly

[HawksOnTheRIse]

I would be happy with #1Hansbrough and trade of for #2Douglas

[Boulevard]

I think this talk of a pg in the first round is more wishfull thinking than anything, we already know Woodson wont play a rookie/unproven pg. Sund is in charge,

First round: B.J. Mullens

Second round: Pick someone to be traded for a future 2nd and cash.

[drzachary]

1: Lawson

2: Vladjcko Romanjovichczi

[AHF]

1 - Eric Maynor

2 - Jeff Pendergraph

[Diesel]

1st round: Teague.

2nd round: Taggert

[drzachary]

1st round: Teague.

2nd round: Taggert

I'm surprised you all are so down on my second-rounder, Vladjcko Romanjovichczi.

[Guest]

#19 Ellington

#49 Siler

Hope I'm wrong though and we get one of the pg's

[T21]

Hansbrough

or

Lawson at 19

I'm sure that Sund will go for players who will be ready to contribute straight away!

Edited June 25, 2009 by T21

[Lascar78]

1-Teague

2-Kravtsov

Although I can't lie, I have a baaaad feeling we will be getting Hansborough.

[Bahamut]

1: Lawson

2: Vladjcko Romanjovichczi

This. :inlove1:

[JJFAN4LF]

I'll switch my prediction to Eric Maynor and Garrett Siler.

[Admin]

I'm surprised you all are so down on my second-rounder, Vladjcko Romanjovichczi.

Couldn't you find someone with a more difficult name?? Sheesh

1-Teague

2-Kravtsov

Although I can't lie, I have a baaaad feeling we will be getting Hansborough.

Why baaaaad? What's wrong with Hansbrough?

[mrhonline]

1-Teague

2-Kravtsov

1-Maynor

2-Kravtsov

[lethalweapon3]

Lawson

Siler

[Lascar78]

Why baaaaad? What's wrong with Hansbrough?

I dunno man. It's been said a million times but he just looks like a guy whose game won't quite translate against bigger, faster players. Basically he's going to be a PF in a SF's body. The most likely scenario is a solid role player who does the little things, I just have a hard time settling for that when you could get a possible starting PG. It seems like the only strength in this draft is PG, and we need help.

Hansborough could easily bust, and even if he doesn't, you've basically got a glut of PF's in Smith-Horford-Hansborough, 1 of which is being played at the C, one that wants to be a SG, and one that has the body of a SF. His measurements were better than expected, but he'd still owrry me. It wouldn't be a bad pick, just one that would leave me nervous until I see him do it against NBA bodies.

[Frenzy]

trade changes mine lol

ill go

#19. Jeff Teague

#49. Alade Aminu

i have faith in my picks

[Admin]

I dunno man. It's been said a million times but he just looks like a guy whose game won't quite translate against bigger, faster players. Basically he's going to be a PF in a SF's body. The most likely scenario is a solid role player who does the little things, I just have a hard time settling for that when you could get a possible starting PG. It seems like the only strength in this draft is PG, and we need help.

Hansborough could easily bust, and even if he doesn't, you've basically got a glut of PF's in Smith-Horford-Hansborough, 1 of which is being played at the C, one that wants to be a SG, and one that has the body of a SF. His measurements were better than expected, but he'd still owrry me. It wouldn't be a bad pick, just one that would leave me nervous until I see him do it against NBA bodies.

I would have agreed with you until the combine measurements came out. Did you see the ESPN article about all of the great NBA PFs that he was bigger, faster, stronger than?

[drzachary]

1-Maynor

2-Kravtsov

Noooo way. Kravtsov is the poor man's Vladjcko Romanjovichczi.

[BusBoyIsBack]

1st- Lawson/Jennings/Teague/Maynor

2nd- Who Cares?

If they draft anybody from UNC not named Ty Lawson in the 1st round, Sund should had to step down

Edited June 25, 2009 by BusBoyIsBack

[exodus]

1) Lawson

2) Kravtsov